These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3469400)

  • 1. Reliability of attachment level measurements using the cementoenamel junction and a plastic stent.
    Clark DC; Chin Quee T; Bergeron MJ; Chan EC; Lautar-Lemay C; de Gruchy K
    J Periodontol; 1987 Feb; 58(2):115-8. PubMed ID: 3469400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A periodontal probe with automated cemento--enamel junction detection-design and clinical trials.
    Jeffcoat MK; Jeffcoat RL; Captain K
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1991 Apr; 38(4):330-3. PubMed ID: 1855793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accuracy of probing attachment levels using a CEJ probe versus traditional probes.
    Karpinia K; Magnusson I; Gibbs C; Yang MC
    J Clin Periodontol; 2004 Mar; 31(3):173-6. PubMed ID: 15016020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Visual and tactile observational error: comparative probing reliability with recession and cementoenamel junction measurements.
    Watts TL
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 1989 Dec; 17(6):310-2. PubMed ID: 2591184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of measurement variability in subjects with moderate periodontitis using a conventional and constant force periodontal probe.
    Osborn JB; Stoltenberg JL; Huso BA; Aeppli DM; Pihlstrom BL
    J Periodontol; 1992 Apr; 63(4):283-9. PubMed ID: 1573541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of measurement variability using a standard and constant force periodontal probe.
    Osborn J; Stoltenberg J; Huso B; Aeppli D; Pihlstrom B
    J Periodontol; 1990 Aug; 61(8):497-503. PubMed ID: 2391627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Probing of pockets related to the attachment level.
    Sivertson JF; Burgett FG
    J Periodontol; 1976 May; 47(5):281-6. PubMed ID: 1063864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of a new furcation stent as a fixed reference point for class II furcation measurements.
    Laxman VK; Khatri M; Devaraj CG; Reddy K; Reddy R
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2009 Mar; 10(2):18-25. PubMed ID: 19279968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Validity of clinical assessments related to the cemento-enamel junction.
    Hug HU; van 't Hof MA; Spanauf AJ; Renggli HH
    J Dent Res; 1983 Jul; 62(7):825-9. PubMed ID: 6575024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of manual and automated probing in an untreated periodontitis population.
    Oringer RJ; Fiorellini JP; Koch GG; Sharp TJ; Nevins ML; Davis GH; Howell TH
    J Periodontol; 1997 Dec; 68(12):1156-62. PubMed ID: 9444589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Periodontal probing and the relationship of the probe tip to periodontal tissues.
    Listgarten MA; Mao R; Robinson PJ
    J Periodontol; 1976 Sep; 47(9):511-3. PubMed ID: 1067404
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reliability of attachment loss measurements in a longitudinal clinical trial.
    Best AM; Burmeister JA; Gunsolley JC; Brooks CN; Schenkein HA
    J Clin Periodontol; 1990 Sep; 17(8):564-9. PubMed ID: 2212086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A new periodontal probe with automated cemento-enamel junction detection.
    Jeffcoat MK; Jeffcoat RL; Jens SC; Captain K
    J Clin Periodontol; 1986 Apr; 13(4):276-80. PubMed ID: 3458724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reproducibility of pocket depth and attachment level measurements when using a flexible splint.
    Isidor F; Karring T; Attström R
    J Clin Periodontol; 1984 Nov; 11(10):662-8. PubMed ID: 6594353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Microradiography of the feline marginal periodontium with a microfocal high-resolution x-ray system.
    Eriksen T; Koch R; Nautrup CP
    Scand J Dent Res; 1994 Oct; 102(5):284-9. PubMed ID: 7817154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Microscopic demonstration of the position of periodontal probes.
    Spray JR; Garnick JJ; Doles LR; Klawitter JJ
    J Periodontol; 1978 Mar; 49(3):148-52. PubMed ID: 288902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A review of the structure and function of the gingival seal.
    Cran JA
    Aust Dent J; 1977 Apr; 22(2):83-7. PubMed ID: 268162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of manual and pressure-controlled periodontal probing.
    Kalkwarf KL; Kaldahl WB; Patil KD
    J Periodontol; 1986 Aug; 57(8):467-71. PubMed ID: 3528451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Gingival attachment level measurements with an automated periodontal probe.
    Birek P; McCulloch CA; Hardy V
    J Clin Periodontol; 1987 Sep; 14(8):472-7. PubMed ID: 3308972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Results of periodontal treatment related to pocket depth and attachment level. Eight years.
    Knowles JW; Burgett FG; Nissle RR; Shick RA; Morrison EC; Ramfjord SP
    J Periodontol; 1979 May; 50(5):225-33. PubMed ID: 287778
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.