These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34694846)

  • 1. Perceptual load and enumeration: Distractor interference depends on subitizing capacity.
    Eayrs JO; Lavie N
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2021 Sep; 47(9):1149-1165. PubMed ID: 34694846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Establishing individual differences in perceptual capacity.
    Eayrs J; Lavie N
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Aug; 44(8):1240-1257. PubMed ID: 29578735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Intentional subitizing: exploring the role of automaticity in enumeration.
    Pincham HL; Szűcs D
    Cognition; 2012 Aug; 124(2):107-16. PubMed ID: 22695378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Zooming in on the cause of the perceptual load effect in the go/no-go paradigm.
    Chen Z; Cave KR
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Aug; 42(8):1072-87. PubMed ID: 26820251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Opening the window: Size of the attentional window dominates perceptual load and familiarity in visual selection.
    Biggs AT; Gibson BS
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Nov; 44(11):1780-1798. PubMed ID: 30247049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dilution: atheoretical burden or just load? A reply to Tsal and Benoni (2010).
    Lavie N; Torralbo A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Dec; 36(6):1657-64; discussion 1665-8. PubMed ID: 21133554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Low level perceptual, not attentional, processes modulate distractor interference in high perceptual load displays: evidence from neglect/extinction.
    Mevorach C; Tsal Y; Humphreys GW
    Front Psychol; 2014 Jan; 4():966. PubMed ID: 24454297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The role of perceptual load in processing distractor faces.
    Lavie N; Ro T; Russell C
    Psychol Sci; 2003 Sep; 14(5):510-5. PubMed ID: 12930485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Processing overlap-dependent distractor dilution rather than perceptual target load determines attentional selectivity.
    Tan J; Yin S; Wang L; Chen A; Egner T
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Nov; 80(8):2048-2059. PubMed ID: 29968079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Selective target processing: perceptual load or distractor salience?
    Eltiti S; Wallace D; Fox E
    Percept Psychophys; 2005 Jul; 67(5):876-85. PubMed ID: 16334059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Attention induced neural response trade-off in retinotopic cortex under load.
    Torralbo A; Kelley TA; Rees G; Lavie N
    Sci Rep; 2016 Sep; 6():33041. PubMed ID: 27625311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Spatial working memory load affects counting but not subitizing in enumeration.
    Shimomura T; Kumada T
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Aug; 73(6):1694-709. PubMed ID: 21671157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Individual differences in parietal and frontal cortex structure predict dissociable capacities for perception and cognitive control.
    Eayrs JO; Lavie N
    Neuroimage; 2019 Nov; 202():116148. PubMed ID: 31476428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The role of perceptual and cognitive load on inattentional blindness: A systematic review and three meta-analyses.
    Matias J; Belletier C; Izaute M; Lutz M; Silvert L
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2022 Oct; 75(10):1844-1875. PubMed ID: 34802311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Attentional set and explicit expectations of perceptual load determine flanker interference.
    Eayrs JO; Kukkonen N; Prutean N; Steendam ST; Boehler CN; Wiersema JR; Krebs RM; Notebaert W
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2024 Jul; 50(7):769-784. PubMed ID: 38722582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. I can see clearly now: the effects of age and perceptual load on inattentional blindness.
    Remington A; Cartwright-Finch U; Lavie N
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2014; 8():229. PubMed ID: 24795596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Interference from familiar natural distractors is not eliminated by high perceptual load.
    He C; Chen A
    Psychol Res; 2010 May; 74(3):268-76. PubMed ID: 19652997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Working memory load and distraction: dissociable effects of visual maintenance and cognitive control.
    Konstantinou N; Beal E; King JR; Lavie N
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 Oct; 76(7):1985-97. PubMed ID: 25085738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Attention and Capacity Limits in Perception: A Cellular Metabolism Account.
    Bruckmaier M; Tachtsidis I; Phan P; Lavie N
    J Neurosci; 2020 Aug; 40(35):6801-6811. PubMed ID: 32747442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Individuation of object parts in aging.
    Tagliabue CF; Lombardi L; Mazza V
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Jul; 82(5):2703-2713. PubMed ID: 32133599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.