These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34694846)

  • 21. Does the standard search task predict performance in related tasks for Kanizsa-style illusory contours?
    Trick LM; Hardy NLA
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Feb; 82(2):478-499. PubMed ID: 31875311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Where have we gone wrong? Perceptual load does not affect selective attention.
    Benoni H; Tsal Y
    Vision Res; 2010 Jun; 50(13):1292-8. PubMed ID: 20430048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Load theory of selective attention and cognitive control.
    Lavie N; Hirst A; de Fockert JW; Viding E
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2004 Sep; 133(3):339-54. PubMed ID: 15355143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Reconceptualizing perceptual load as a rate problem: The role of time in the allocation of selective attention.
    Li Z; Xin K; Li W; Li Y
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Sep; 44(9):1458-1471. PubMed ID: 29708380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. What enumeration studies can show us about spatial attention: evidence for limited capacity preattentive processing.
    Trick LM; Pylyshyn ZW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1993 Apr; 19(2):331-51. PubMed ID: 8473843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Dilution, not load, affects distractor processing.
    Wilson DE; Muroi M; MacLeod CM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Apr; 37(2):319-35. PubMed ID: 21299322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Concurrent working memory load can facilitate selective attention: evidence for specialized load.
    Park S; Kim MS; Chun MM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Oct; 33(5):1062-75. PubMed ID: 17924807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effects of distraction on visual enumeration in children and adults.
    Maylor EA; Watson DG; Hartley EL
    Dev Psychol; 2011 Sep; 47(5):1440-7. PubMed ID: 21744947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Practice in visual search produces decreased capacity demands but increased distraction.
    Wilson DE; MacLeod CM; Muroi M
    Percept Psychophys; 2008 Aug; 70(6):1130-7. PubMed ID: 18717397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Beyond perception: testing for implicit conceptual traces in high-load tasks.
    Ruz M; Fuentes LJ
    Conscious Cogn; 2009 Sep; 18(3):820-2. PubMed ID: 19625197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Attention set for number: expectation and perceptual load in inattentional blindness.
    White RC; Aimola Davies A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Oct; 34(5):1092-107. PubMed ID: 18823197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Distractor effects during processing of words under load.
    Brand-D'Abrescia M; Lavie N
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2007 Dec; 14(6):1153-7. PubMed ID: 18229489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The spatial focus of attention is controlled at perceptual and cognitive levels.
    Caparos S; Linnell KJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Oct; 36(5):1080-107. PubMed ID: 20873935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Two's company, three's a crowd: Individuation is necessary for object recognition.
    Chakravarthi R; Herbert A
    Cognition; 2019 Mar; 184():69-82. PubMed ID: 30576886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Visual perceptual load induces inattentional deafness.
    Macdonald JS; Lavie N
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Aug; 73(6):1780-9. PubMed ID: 21611856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Small numerosity advantage for sequential enumeration on RSVP stimuli: an object individuation-based account.
    Cheng X; Lin C; Lou C; Zhang W; Han Y; Ding X; Fan Z
    Psychol Res; 2021 Mar; 85(2):734-763. PubMed ID: 31696296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Plugging the attention deficit: perceptual load counters increased distraction in ADHD.
    Forster S; Robertson DJ; Jennings A; Asherson P; Lavie N
    Neuropsychology; 2014 Jan; 28(1):91-7. PubMed ID: 24219607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Modulating attentional load affects numerosity estimation: evidence against a pre-attentive subitizing mechanism.
    Vetter P; Butterworth B; Bahrami B
    PLoS One; 2008 Sep; 3(9):e3269. PubMed ID: 18813345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Perceptual load modulates the processing of distractors presented at task-irrelevant locations during the attentional blink.
    Elliott JC; Giesbrecht B
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Nov; 72(8):2106-14. PubMed ID: 21097855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Subitizing object parts reveals a second stage of individuation.
    Poncet M; Chakravarthi R
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2021 Apr; 28(2):476-486. PubMed ID: 33205262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.