These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34694848)

  • 1. Attentional guidance by irrelevant features depends on their successful encoding into working memory.
    Kerzel D; Huynh Cong S
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2021 Sep; 47(9):1182-1191. PubMed ID: 34694848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Involuntary top-down control by search-irrelevant features: Visual working memory biases attention in an object-based manner.
    Foerster RM; Schneider WX
    Cognition; 2018 Mar; 172():37-45. PubMed ID: 29223864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The allocation of resources in visual working memory and multiple attentional templates.
    Kerzel D; Witzel C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 May; 45(5):645-658. PubMed ID: 30920252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Oculomotor capture by search-irrelevant features in visual working memory: on the crucial role of target-distractor similarity.
    Foerster RM; Schneider WX
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Jul; 82(5):2379-2392. PubMed ID: 32166644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Object features reinstated from episodic memory guide attentional selection.
    Kerzel D; Andres MK
    Cognition; 2020 Apr; 197():104158. PubMed ID: 31986352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Oculomotor capture reveals trial-by-trial neural correlates of attentional guidance by contents of visual working memory.
    Beck VM; Vickery TJ
    Cortex; 2020 Jan; 122():159-169. PubMed ID: 30392969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Guidance of attention from visual working memory is feature-based, not object-based: Implications for models of feature binding.
    Thayer DD; Bahle B; Hollingworth A
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2022 May; 151(5):1018-1034. PubMed ID: 34735186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Feature-based guidance of attention during post-saccadic selection.
    Hollingworth A; Matsukura M
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Aug; 81(6):1822-1835. PubMed ID: 30980343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparing the temporal dynamics and efficacy of task-relevant and task-irrelevant memory-driven attention.
    Jung K; Han SW; Min Y
    Cogn Process; 2022 May; 23(2):299-308. PubMed ID: 35001208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dynamic interactions between visual working memory and saccade target selection.
    Schneegans S; Spencer JP; Schöner G; Hwang S; Hollingworth A
    J Vis; 2014 Sep; 14(11):. PubMed ID: 25228628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Saccadic selection does not eliminate attribute amnesia.
    Born S; Puntiroli M; Jordan D; Kerzel D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Dec; 45(12):2165-2173. PubMed ID: 30883172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Symbolic control of visual attention: The role of working memory and attentional control settings.
    Pratt J; Hommel B
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2003 Oct; 29(5):835-45. PubMed ID: 14585008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Long-term memory for distractors: Effects of involuntary attention from working memory.
    Moriya J
    Mem Cognit; 2024 Feb; 52(2):401-416. PubMed ID: 37768481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Automatic selection of irrelevant object features through working memory: evidence for top-down attentional capture.
    Soto D; Humphreys GW
    Exp Psychol; 2009; 56(3):165-72. PubMed ID: 19289358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The time course of encoding and maintenance of task-relevant versus irrelevant object features in working memory.
    Bocincova A; Johnson JS
    Cortex; 2019 Feb; 111():196-209. PubMed ID: 30508678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Object-based Encoding in Visual Working Memory: Evidence from Memory-driven Attentional Capture.
    Gao Z; Yu S; Zhu C; Shui R; Weng X; Li P; Shen M
    Sci Rep; 2016 Mar; 6():22822. PubMed ID: 26956084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Visual working memory load disrupts the space-based attentional guidance of target selection.
    Berggren N; Eimer M
    Br J Psychol; 2019 May; 110(2):357-371. PubMed ID: 29943810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Spatial location is filtered out of visual working memory representations when task irrelevant, just like other features.
    Woodman GF
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 May; 83(4):1391-1396. PubMed ID: 33728509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effects of search-irrelevant working memory content on visual search.
    Calleja MO; Willoughby AR
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2023 Feb; 85(2):293-300. PubMed ID: 36596986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Object-based target templates guide attention during visual search.
    Berggren N; Eimer M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Sep; 44(9):1368-1382. PubMed ID: 29723006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.