These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34694952)

  • 1. The effect of microprocessor controlled exo-prosthetic knees on limited community ambulators: systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Hahn A; Bueschges S; Prager M; Kannenberg A
    Disabil Rehabil; 2022 Dec; 44(24):7349-7367. PubMed ID: 34694952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Enhancement of a prosthetic knee with a microprocessor-controlled gait phase switch reduces falls and improves balance confidence and gait speed in community ambulators with unilateral transfemoral amputation.
    Fuenzalida Squella SA; Kannenberg A; Brandão Benetti Â
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2018 Apr; 42(2):228-235. PubMed ID: 28691574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Benefits of microprocessor-controlled prosthetic knees to limited community ambulators: systematic review.
    Kannenberg A; Zacharias B; Pröbsting E
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2014; 51(10):1469-96. PubMed ID: 25856664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Benefits of the Genium microprocessor controlled prosthetic knee on ambulation, mobility, activities of daily living and quality of life: a systematic literature review.
    Mileusnic MP; Rettinger L; Highsmith MJ; Hahn A
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2021 Jul; 16(5):453-464. PubMed ID: 31469023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Functional assessment and satisfaction of transfemoral amputees with low mobility (FASTK2): A clinical trial of microprocessor-controlled vs. non-microprocessor-controlled knees.
    Kaufman KR; Bernhardt KA; Symms K
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2018 Oct; 58():116-122. PubMed ID: 30077128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Can microprocessor knees reduce the disparity in trips and falls risks between above and below knee prosthesis users?
    McGrath M; Gray LA; Rek B; Davies KC; Savage Z; McLean J; Stenson A; Zahedi S
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(9):e0271315. PubMed ID: 36054087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The comparison of transfemoral amputees using mechanical and microprocessor- controlled prosthetic knee under different walking speeds: A randomized cross-over trial.
    Cao W; Yu H; Zhao W; Meng Q; Chen W
    Technol Health Care; 2018; 26(4):581-592. PubMed ID: 29710741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Safety and function of a prototype microprocessor-controlled knee prosthesis for low active transfemoral amputees switching from a mechanic knee prosthesis: a pilot study.
    Hasenoehrl T; Schmalz T; Windhager R; Domayer S; Dana S; Ambrozy C; Palma S; Crevenna R
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2018 Feb; 13(2):157-165. PubMed ID: 28399722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prosthetic Knee Selection for Individuals with Unilateral Transfemoral Amputation: A Clinical Practice Guideline.
    Stevens PM; Wurdeman SR
    J Prosthet Orthot; 2019 Jan; 31(1):2-8. PubMed ID: 30662248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Using a microprocessor knee (C-Leg) with appropriate foot transitioned individuals with dysvascular transfemoral amputations to higher performance levels: a longitudinal randomized clinical trial.
    Jayaraman C; Mummidisetty CK; Albert MV; Lipschutz R; Hoppe-Ludwig S; Mathur G; Jayaraman A
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2021 May; 18(1):88. PubMed ID: 34034753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessment of transfemoral amputees using a passive microprocessor-controlled knee versus an active powered microprocessor-controlled knee for level walking.
    Creylman V; Knippels I; Janssen P; Biesbrouck E; Lechler K; Peeraer L
    Biomed Eng Online; 2016 Dec; 15(Suppl 3):142. PubMed ID: 28105945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Economic benefits of microprocessor controlled prosthetic knees: a modeling study.
    Chen C; Hanson M; Chaturvedi R; Mattke S; Hillestad R; Liu HH
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2018 Sep; 15(Suppl 1):62. PubMed ID: 30255802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of patient-reported and functional outcomes following transition from mechanical to microprocessor knee in the low-activity user with a unilateral transfemoral amputation.
    Davie-Smith F; Carse B
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2021 Jun; 45(3):198-204. PubMed ID: 34016872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mobility and satisfaction with a microprocessor-controlled knee in moderately active amputees: A multi-centric randomized crossover trial.
    Lansade C; Vicaut E; Paysant J; Ménager D; Cristina MC; Braatz F; Domayer S; Pérennou D; Chiesa G
    Ann Phys Rehabil Med; 2018 Sep; 61(5):278-285. PubMed ID: 29753888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of function, performance, and preference as transfemoral amputees transition from mechanical to microprocessor control of the prosthetic knee.
    Hafner BJ; Willingham LL; Buell NC; Allyn KJ; Smith DG
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2007 Feb; 88(2):207-17. PubMed ID: 17270519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reduced cortical brain activity with the use of microprocessor-controlled prosthetic knees during walking.
    Möller S; Rusaw D; Hagberg K; Ramstrand N
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2019 Jun; 43(3):257-265. PubMed ID: 30375285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of gait outcomes for individuals with established unilateral transfemoral amputation following the provision of microprocessor controlled knees in the context of a clinical service.
    Carse B; Scott H; Brady L; Colvin J
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2021 Jun; 45(3):254-261. PubMed ID: 34016870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Kenevo microprocessor-controlled prosthetic knee compared with non-microprocessor-controlled knees in individuals older than 65 years in Sweden: A cost-effectiveness and budget-impact analysis.
    Kuhlmann A; Hagberg K; Kamrad I; Ramstrand N; Seidinger S; Berg H
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2022 Oct; 46(5):414-424. PubMed ID: 35511441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Stability and Falls Evaluations in AMPutees (SAFE-AMP 1): Microprocessor knee technology reduces odds of incurring an injurious fall for individuals with diabetic/dysvascular amputation.
    Wurdeman SR; Miller TA; Stevens PM; Campbell JH
    Assist Technol; 2023 May; 35(3):205-210. PubMed ID: 34870561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Functional added value of microprocessor-controlled knee joints in daily life performance of Medicare Functional Classification Level-2 amputees.
    Theeven P; Hemmen B; Rings F; Meys G; Brink P; Smeets R; Seelen H
    J Rehabil Med; 2011 Oct; 43(10):906-15. PubMed ID: 21947182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.