207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34695251)
1. The effect of on-site application density on the UV protection efficacy of sunscreens.
Fujiwara R; Muta K; Izutsu Y; Hatao M
Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed; 2022 May; 38(3):259-265. PubMed ID: 34695251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. High-SPF sunscreens (SPF ≥ 70) may provide ultraviolet protection above minimal recommended levels by adequately compensating for lower sunscreen user application amounts.
Ou-Yang H; Stanfield J; Cole C; Appa Y; Rigel D
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2012 Dec; 67(6):1220-7. PubMed ID: 22463921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Broad-spectrum sunscreens provide better protection from solar ultraviolet-simulated radiation and natural sunlight-induced immunosuppression in human beings.
Moyal DD; Fourtanier AM
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2008 May; 58(5 Suppl 2):S149-54. PubMed ID: 18410801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Optimal sunscreen use, during a sun holiday with a very high ultraviolet index, allows vitamin D synthesis without sunburn.
Young AR; Narbutt J; Harrison GI; Lawrence KP; Bell M; O'Connor C; Olsen P; Grys K; Baczynska KA; Rogowski-Tylman M; Wulf HC; Lesiak A; Philipsen PA
Br J Dermatol; 2019 Nov; 181(5):1052-1062. PubMed ID: 31069787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Laboratory testing of sunscreens on the US market finds lower in vitro SPF values than on labels and even less UVA protection.
Andrews DQ; Rauhe K; Burns C; Spilman E; Temkin AM; Perrone-Gray S; Naidenko OV; Leiba N
Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed; 2022 May; 38(3):224-232. PubMed ID: 34601762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Photoprotective efficacy and photostability of fifteen sunscreen products having the same label SPF subjected to natural sunlight.
Hojerová J; Medovcíková A; Mikula M
Int J Pharm; 2011 Apr; 408(1-2):27-38. PubMed ID: 21277959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. SPF 100+ sunscreen is more protective against sunburn than SPF 50+ in actual use: Results of a randomized, double-blind, split-face, natural sunlight exposure clinical trial.
Williams JD; Maitra P; Atillasoy E; Wu MM; Farberg AS; Rigel DS
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2018 May; 78(5):902-910.e2. PubMed ID: 29291958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Layer Thickness of SPF 30 Sunscreen and Formation of Pre-vitamin D.
Grigalavicius M; Iani V; Juzeniene A
Anticancer Res; 2016 Mar; 36(3):1409-15. PubMed ID: 26977044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The relation between the amount of sunscreen applied and the sun protection factor in Asian skin.
Kim SM; Oh BH; Lee YW; Choe YB; Ahn KJ
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2010 Feb; 62(2):218-22. PubMed ID: 19962787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Sun protection factors: world wide confusion.
Osterwalder U; Herzog B
Br J Dermatol; 2009 Nov; 161 Suppl 3():13-24. PubMed ID: 19775352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Sunscreens prevent local and systemic immunosuppression of contact hypersensitivity in mice exposed to solar-simulated ultraviolet radiation.
Roberts LK; Beasley DG
J Photochem Photobiol B; 1997 Jun; 39(2):121-9. PubMed ID: 9225458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. New noninvasive approach assessing in vivo sun protection factor (SPF) using diffuse reflectance spectroscopy (DRS) and in vitro transmission.
Ruvolo Junior E; Kollias N; Cole C
Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed; 2014 Aug; 30(4):202-11. PubMed ID: 24417335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluating the Sun Protection Factor of Cosmetic Formulations Containing Afzelin.
Kim M; Shin S; Ryu D; Cho E; Yoo J; Park D; Jung E
Chem Pharm Bull (Tokyo); 2021 Nov; 69(11):1039-1044. PubMed ID: 34456215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Efficacy of broad-spectrum sunscreens against the suppression of elicitation of delayed-type hypersensitivity responses in humans depends on the level of ultraviolet A protection.
Moyal DD; Fourtanier AM
Exp Dermatol; 2003 Apr; 12(2):153-9. PubMed ID: 12702143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessment of Natural Sunlight Protection Provided by 10 High-SPF Broad-Spectrum Sunscreens and Sun-Protective Fabrics.
Hughes SNG; Lowe NJ; Gross K; Mark L; Goffe B; Hughes H; Cole C
Curr Probl Dermatol; 2021; 55():157-169. PubMed ID: 34698042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Hybrid Diffuse Reflectance Spectroscopy: Non-Erythemal in vivo Testing of Sun Protection Factor.
Rohr M; Ernst N; Schrader A
Skin Pharmacol Physiol; 2018; 31(4):220-228. PubMed ID: 29791917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessment of the general quality of sunscreen products available in Palestine and method verification of the sun protection factor using Food and Drug Administration guidelines.
Zaid AN; Jaradat N; Darwish S; Nairat S; Shamlawi R; Hamad Y; Hussein F; Issa L
J Cosmet Dermatol; 2018 Dec; 17(6):1122-1129. PubMed ID: 29377413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The influence of the amount of sunscreen applied and its sun protection factor (SPF): evaluation of two sunscreens including the same ingredients at different concentrations.
Schalka S; dos Reis VM; Cucé LC
Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed; 2009 Aug; 25(4):175-80. PubMed ID: 19614894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. DNA dosimetry assessment for sunscreen genotoxic photoprotection.
Schuch AP; Lago JC; Yagura T; Menck CF
PLoS One; 2012; 7(6):e40344. PubMed ID: 22768281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Suboptimal UVA attenuation by broad spectrum sunscreens under outdoor solar conditions contributes to lifetime UVA burden.
Coelho SG; Rua D; Miller SA; Agrawal A
Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed; 2020 Jan; 36(1):42-52. PubMed ID: 31376300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
