214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34695517)
1. Exposure assessment of PM
Chen PC; Lin YT
Environ Pollut; 2022 Jan; 292(Pt B):118401. PubMed ID: 34695517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The improvement of spatial-temporal resolution of PM
Lin YC; Chi WJ; Lin YQ
Environ Int; 2020 Jan; 134():105305. PubMed ID: 31739136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A land use regression model using machine learning and locally developed low cost particulate matter sensors in Uganda.
Coker ES; Amegah AK; Mwebaze E; Ssematimba J; Bainomugisha E
Environ Res; 2021 Aug; 199():111352. PubMed ID: 34043968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Spatio-temporal models to estimate daily concentrations of fine particulate matter in Montreal: Kriging with external drift and inverse distance-weighted approaches.
Ramos Y; St-Onge B; Blanchet JP; Smargiassi A
J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol; 2016 Jun; 26(4):405-14. PubMed ID: 26648248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Estimating ground-level PM
Ho CC; Chen LJ; Hwang JS
Environ Pollut; 2020 Sep; 264():114810. PubMed ID: 32559863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessment of different route choice on commuters' exposure to air pollution in Taipei, Taiwan.
Li HC; Chiueh PT; Liu SP; Huang YY
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2017 Jan; 24(3):3163-3171. PubMed ID: 27864736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Temporal and spatial statistical analysis of ambient air quality of Assam (India).
Bhunia GS; Ding D
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2020 Aug; 70(8):775-794. PubMed ID: 32442037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An assessment of air pollutant exposure methods in Mexico City, Mexico.
Rivera-González LO; Zhang Z; Sánchez BN; Zhang K; Brown DG; Rojas-Bracho L; Osornio-Vargas A; Vadillo-Ortega F; O'Neill MS
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2015 May; 65(5):581-91. PubMed ID: 25947316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A new method for interpolation of missing air quality data at monitor stations.
Xu C; Wang J; Hu M; Wang W
Environ Int; 2022 Nov; 169():107538. PubMed ID: 36191483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessment and statistical modeling of the relationship between remotely sensed aerosol optical depth and PM2.5 in the eastern United States.
Paciorek CJ; Liu Y;
Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2012 May; (167):5-83; discussion 85-91. PubMed ID: 22838153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Fast inverse distance weighting-based spatiotemporal interpolation: a web-based application of interpolating daily fine particulate matter PM2:5 in the contiguous U.S. using parallel programming and k-d tree.
Li L; Losser T; Yorke C; Piltner R
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2014 Sep; 11(9):9101-41. PubMed ID: 25192146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Measurement and modeling of particulate matter concentrations: Applying spatial analysis and regression techniques to assess air quality.
Sajjadi SA; Zolfaghari G; Adab H; Allahabadi A; Delsouz M
MethodsX; 2017; 4():372-390. PubMed ID: 29085784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Five Years of Accurate PM
Robinson DL; Goodman N; Vardoulakis S
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2023 Nov; 20(23):. PubMed ID: 38063557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Air quality mapping using GIS and economic evaluation of health impact for Mumbai City, India.
Kumar A; Gupta I; Brandt J; Kumar R; Dikshit AK; Patil RS
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2016 May; 66(5):470-81. PubMed ID: 26828812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Incorporating long-term satellite-based aerosol optical depth, localized land use data, and meteorological variables to estimate ground-level PM
Jung CR; Hwang BF; Chen WT
Environ Pollut; 2018 Jun; 237():1000-1010. PubMed ID: 29157969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Estimating monthly PM
Chen CC; Wang YR; Yeh HY; Lin TH; Huang CS; Wu CF
Environ Pollut; 2021 Dec; 291():118159. PubMed ID: 34543952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The impact of the congestion charging scheme on air quality in London. Part 1. Emissions modeling and analysis of air pollution measurements.
Kelly F; Anderson HR; Armstrong B; Atkinson R; Barratt B; Beevers S; Derwent D; Green D; Mudway I; Wilkinson P;
Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2011 Apr; (155):5-71. PubMed ID: 21830496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Spatiotemporal Interpolation Methods for the Application of Estimating Population Exposure to Fine Particulate Matter in the Contiguous U.S. and a Real-Time Web Application.
Li L; Zhou X; Kalo M; Piltner R
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2016 Jul; 13(8):. PubMed ID: 27463722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Improving accuracy of air pollution exposure measurements: Statistical correction of a municipal low-cost airborne particulate matter sensor network.
Considine EM; Reid CE; Ogletree MR; Dye T
Environ Pollut; 2021 Jan; 268(Pt B):115833. PubMed ID: 33120139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Using Multisource Data to Assess PM
Fan W; Xu L; Zheng H
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Feb; 19(5):. PubMed ID: 35270346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
