These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3469624)

  • 1. Channel depth and diameter: effects on transverse strength of amalgapin-retained restorations.
    Roddy WC; Blank LW; Rupp NW; Pelleu GB
    Oper Dent; 1987; 12(1):2-9. PubMed ID: 3469624
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of cross-sectional area on transverse strength of Amalgapin-retained restorations.
    Certosimo AJ; House RC; Anderson MH
    Oper Dent; 1991; 16(2):70-6. PubMed ID: 1803331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A review of the amalgapin technique for complex amalgam restorations.
    Eberting JJ
    Gen Dent; 2000; 48(1):92-5. PubMed ID: 11199563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Early fracture resistance of amalgapin-retained complex amalgam restorations.
    Schulte GA; Hermesch CB; Vandewalle KS; Buikema DJ
    Oper Dent; 1998; 23(3):108-12. PubMed ID: 9656920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Rationale for pin-retained amalgam restorations.
    Collard EW; Caputo AA; Standlee JP
    Dent Clin North Am; 1970 Jan; 14(1):43-51. PubMed ID: 5262043
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Optimized pin geometry for improved retention of parapulpal pins in amalgam].
    Neumeyer S; Gernet W; Bötsch H
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1991 Aug; 46(8):550-2. PubMed ID: 1817928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A second look at the Amalgapin technique.
    Leach CD; Martinoff JT; Lee CV
    CDA J; 1983 Apr; 11(4):43-9. PubMed ID: 6349829
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The amalgapin technique for complex amalgam restorations.
    Shavell HM
    J Calif Dent Assoc (1961); 1980 Apr; 8(4):48-55. PubMed ID: 6935206
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of three types of pins on compressive strength of dental amalgam.
    Duperon DF; Kasloff Z
    J Can Dent Assoc (Tor); 1971 Nov; 37(11):422-8. PubMed ID: 5288885
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. ["Amalgapin": a new alternative in execution of complex restorations in amalgam].
    Baratieri LN; de Andrada MA; Tavares R
    RGO; 1987; 35(5):375-9. PubMed ID: 3484060
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Self-threading pins and amalgapins compared in resistance form for complex amalgam restorations.
    Davis SP; Summitt JB; Mayhew RB; Hawley RJ
    Oper Dent; 1983; 8(3):88-93. PubMed ID: 6583666
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Re-inforcement of amalgam. 1: Effect of pin orientation, type, and number on the tensile strength of amalgam.
    el-Bahloul AN
    Egypt Dent J; 1977 Apr; 23(2):99-110. PubMed ID: 271565
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Six-year clinical evaluation of bonded and pin-retained complex amalgam restorations.
    Summitt JB; Burgess JO; Berry TG; Robbins JW; Osborne JW; Haveman CW
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(3):261-8. PubMed ID: 15195725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fracture strength of amalgam crowns with repaired endodontic access.
    Hachmeister KA; Dunn WJ; Murchison DF; Larsen RB
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(3):254-8. PubMed ID: 12022456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Retention of complex amalgam restorations using self-threading pins, amalgapins, and Amalgambond.
    Imbery TA; Hilton TJ; Reagan SE
    Am J Dent; 1995 Jun; 8(3):117-21. PubMed ID: 8599585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fracture resistance of complex amalgam restorations.
    Burgess JO; Alvarez A; Summitt JB
    Oper Dent; 1997; 22(3):128-32. PubMed ID: 9484151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Pins and their relation to cavity resistance form for amalgam.
    Buikema DJ; Mayhew RB; Voss JE; Bales DJ
    Quintessence Int; 1985 Mar; 16(3):187-90. PubMed ID: 3857664
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The strength of class II amalgam restorations with and without pins.
    Mondelli J; Vieira DF
    J Prosthet Dent; 1972 Aug; 28(2):179-88. PubMed ID: 4504302
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of preparation design on the resistance for extensive amalgam restorations.
    Plasmans PJ; Kusters ST; Thissen AM; Van'T Hof MA; Vrijhoef MM
    Oper Dent; 1987; 12(2):42-7. PubMed ID: 3473449
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of restoration size on fracture resistance of bonded amalgam restorations.
    Lindemuth JS; Hagge MS; Broome JS
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(3):177-81. PubMed ID: 11203813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.