153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34696715)
1. The analysis of multilevel factors affecting adenoma detection rates for colonoscopies: a large-scale retrospective study.
Huang L; Hu Y; Liu S; Jin B; Lu B
BMC Gastroenterol; 2021 Oct; 21(1):403. PubMed ID: 34696715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Quality of colonoscopy in an organised colorectal cancer screening programme with immunochemical faecal occult blood test: the EQuIPE study (Evaluating Quality Indicators of the Performance of Endoscopy).
Zorzi M; Senore C; Da Re F; Barca A; Bonelli LA; Cannizzaro R; Fasoli R; Di Furia L; Di Giulio E; Mantellini P; Naldoni C; Sassatelli R; Rex D; Hassan C; Zappa M;
Gut; 2015 Sep; 64(9):1389-96. PubMed ID: 25227521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Variable Endoscopist performance in proximal and distal adenoma detection during colonoscopy: a retrospective cohort study.
James P; Hegagi M; Hegagi M; Antonova L; Rostom A; Dube C; Murthy S; Goel R; Chatterjee A
BMC Gastroenterol; 2018 May; 18(1):73. PubMed ID: 29848305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Increased Rate of Adenoma Detection Associates With Reduced Risk of Colorectal Cancer and Death.
Kaminski MF; Wieszczy P; Rupinski M; Wojciechowska U; Didkowska J; Kraszewska E; Kobiela J; Franczyk R; Rupinska M; Kocot B; Chaber-Ciopinska A; Pachlewski J; Polkowski M; Regula J
Gastroenterology; 2017 Jul; 153(1):98-105. PubMed ID: 28428142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Endoscopist-related factors affecting adenoma detection during colonoscopy: Data from the J-SCOUT study.
Kawamura T; Sekiguchi M; Takamaru H; Mizuguchi Y; Horiguchi G; Toyoizumi H; Kato M; Kobayashi K; Sada M; Oda Y; Yokoyama A; Utsumi T; Tsuji Y; Ohki D; Takeuchi Y; Shichijo S; Ikematsu H; Matsuda K; Teramukai S; Kobayashi N; Matsuda T; Saito Y; Tanaka K
Dig Endosc; 2024 Jan; 36(1):51-58. PubMed ID: 37953649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Adenoma Detection Rate and Risk for Interval Postcolonoscopy Colorectal Cancer in Fecal Immunochemical Test-Based Screening : A Population-Based Cohort Study.
Wisse PHA; Erler NS; de Boer SY; den Hartog B; Oudkerk Pool M; Terhaar Sive Droste JS; Verveer C; Meijer GA; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I; Kuipers EJ; Dekker E; Spaander MCW
Ann Intern Med; 2022 Oct; 175(10):1366-1373. PubMed ID: 36162114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Association of Adenoma and Proximal Sessile Serrated Polyp Detection Rates With Endoscopist Characteristics.
Sarvepalli S; Garber A; Rothberg MB; Mankaney G; McMichael J; Morris-Stiff G; Vargo JJ; Rizk MK; Burke CA
JAMA Surg; 2019 Jul; 154(7):627-635. PubMed ID: 30994911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Anatomic and advanced adenoma detection rates as quality metrics determined via natural language processing.
Gawron AJ; Thompson WK; Keswani RN; Rasmussen LV; Kho AN
Am J Gastroenterol; 2014 Dec; 109(12):1844-9. PubMed ID: 24935271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Serrated polyp detection and risk of interval post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer: a population-based study.
van Toledo DEFWM; IJspeert JEG; Bossuyt PMM; Bleijenberg AGC; van Leerdam ME; van der Vlugt M; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I; Spaander MCW; Dekker E
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2022 Aug; 7(8):747-754. PubMed ID: 35550250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Providing data for serrated polyp detection rate benchmarks: an analysis of the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry.
Anderson JC; Butterly LF; Weiss JE; Robinson CM
Gastrointest Endosc; 2017 Jun; 85(6):1188-1194. PubMed ID: 28153571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Endoscopist characteristics that influence the quality of colonoscopy.
Jover R; Zapater P; Bujanda L; Hernández V; Cubiella J; Pellisé M; Ponce M; Ono A; Lanas A; Seoane A; Marín-Gabriel JC; Chaparro M; Cacho G; Herreros-de-Tejada A; Fernández-Díez S; Peris A; Nicolás-Pérez D; Murcia O; Castells A; Quintero E;
Endoscopy; 2016 Mar; 48(3):241-7. PubMed ID: 26845473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Adenoma Detection Rate (ADR) Irrespective of Indication Is Comparable to Screening ADR: Implications for Quality Monitoring.
Kaltenbach T; Gawron A; Meyer CS; Gupta S; Shergill A; Dominitz JA; Soetikno RM; Nguyen-Vu T; A Whooley M; Kahi CJ
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2021 Sep; 19(9):1883-1889.e1. PubMed ID: 33618027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Correlation between ADR of screening and all colonoscopies.
Mikoviny Kajzrlikova I; Vitek P; Chalupa J; Kuchar J; Platos J; Reha P; Klvana P
Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub; 2021 Nov; 165(4):386-389. PubMed ID: 33325459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Difference in Physician- and Patient-Dependent Factors Contributing to Adenoma Detection Rate and Serrated Polyp Detection Rate.
Cavicchi M; Tharsis G; Burtin P; Cattan P; Venezia F; Tordjman G; Gillet A; Samama J; Nahon-Uzan K; Karsenti D
Dig Dis Sci; 2019 Dec; 64(12):3579-3588. PubMed ID: 31471862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The conversion factor for predicting adenoma detection rate from polyp detection rate varies according to colonoscopy indication and patient sex.
Vojtechova G; Ngo O; Grega T; Kmochova K; Voska M; Buckova B; Majek O; Zavoral M; Suchanek S
Eur J Cancer Prev; 2020 Jul; 29(4):294-302. PubMed ID: 32543806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Polyp Sizing Poster Improves Polyp Measurement but not Adenoma Detection Rates by Endoscopists in a Large Community Practice.
Shaukat A; Shamsi N; Menk J; Church TR; Rank J; Colton JB
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2019 Sep; 17(10):2034-2041. PubMed ID: 30312788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Correlation between Surrogate Quality Indicators for Adenoma Detection Rate and Adenoma Miss Rate in Qualified Colonoscopy, CORE Study: KASID Multicenter Study.
Han JH; Kim HG; Ahn EM; Park S; Jeon SR; Cha JM; Kwak MS; Jung Y; Shin JE; Shin HD; Cho YS
Gut Liver; 2022 Sep; 16(5):716-725. PubMed ID: 34933279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Impact of fair bowel preparation quality on adenoma and serrated polyp detection: data from the New Hampshire colonoscopy registry by using a standardized preparation-quality rating.
Anderson JC; Butterly LF; Robinson CM; Goodrich M; Weiss JE
Gastrointest Endosc; 2014 Sep; 80(3):463-70. PubMed ID: 24818550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Defining adenoma detection rate benchmarks in average-risk male veterans.
El-Halabi MM; Rex DK; Saito A; Eckert GJ; Kahi CJ
Gastrointest Endosc; 2019 Jan; 89(1):137-143. PubMed ID: 30144416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The Secondary Quality Indicator to Improve Prediction of Adenoma Miss Rate Apart from Adenoma Detection Rate.
Aniwan S; Orkoonsawat P; Viriyautsahakul V; Angsuwatcharakon P; Pittayanon R; Wisedopas N; Sumdin S; Ponuthai Y; Wiangngoen S; Kullavanijaya P; Rerknimitr R
Am J Gastroenterol; 2016 May; 111(5):723-9. PubMed ID: 26809333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
