153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34696715)
21. Defining Benchmarks for Adenoma Detection Rate and Adenomas Per Colonoscopy in Patients Undergoing Colonoscopy Due to a Positive Fecal Immunochemical Test.
Hilsden RJ; Bridges R; Dube C; McGregor SE; Naugler C; Rose SM; Rostom A; Heitman SJ
Am J Gastroenterol; 2016 Dec; 111(12):1743-1749. PubMed ID: 27725649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Quality of colonoscopy withdrawal technique and variability in adenoma detection rates (with videos).
Lee RH; Tang RS; Muthusamy VR; Ho SB; Shah NK; Wetzel L; Bain AS; Mackintosh EE; Paek AM; Crissien AM; Saraf LJ; Kalmaz DM; Savides TJ
Gastrointest Endosc; 2011 Jul; 74(1):128-34. PubMed ID: 21531410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Differences in detection rates of adenomas and serrated polyps in screening versus surveillance colonoscopies, based on the new hampshire colonoscopy registry.
Anderson JC; Butterly LF; Goodrich M; Robinson CM; Weiss JE
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2013 Oct; 11(10):1308-12. PubMed ID: 23660415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Association of Adenoma Detection Rate and Adenoma Characteristics With Colorectal Cancer Mortality After Screening Colonoscopy.
Waldmann E; Kammerlander AA; Gessl I; Penz D; Majcher B; Hinterberger A; Bretthauer M; Trauner MH; Ferlitsch M
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2021 Sep; 19(9):1890-1898. PubMed ID: 33878471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Morning colonoscopies are associated with improved adenoma detection rates.
Teng TY; Khor SN; Kailasam M; Cheah WK; Lau CC
Surg Endosc; 2016 May; 30(5):1796-803. PubMed ID: 26198158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Factors Associated with Surveillance Adenoma and Sessile Serrated Polyp Detection Rates.
Maratt JK; Dickens J; Schoenfeld PS; Elta GH; Jackson K; Rizk D; Erickson C; Menees SB
Dig Dis Sci; 2017 Dec; 62(12):3579-3585. PubMed ID: 29043592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Public reporting of colonoscopy quality is associated with an increase in endoscopist adenoma detection rate.
Abdul-Baki H; Schoen RE; Dean K; Rose S; Leffler DA; Kuganeswaran E; Morris M; Carrell D; Mehrotra A
Gastrointest Endosc; 2015 Oct; 82(4):676-82. PubMed ID: 26385276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comprehensive evaluation of the learning curve to achieve satisfactory adenoma detection rate.
Dong Z; Sun H; Li B; Zhang Q; Sun K; Wang Z; Qian X; Wang J; Zhan T; Jiang Y; Chen Y; Xu S
J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2021 Jun; 36(6):1649-1655. PubMed ID: 33105040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Endoscopist Fatigue May Contribute to a Decline in the Effectiveness of Screening Colonoscopy.
Lee CK; Cha JM; Kim WJ
J Clin Gastroenterol; 2015 Jul; 49(6):e51-6. PubMed ID: 25110871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Impact of adenoma detection rate on detection of advanced adenomas and endoscopic adverse events in a study of over 200,000 screening colonoscopies.
Penz D; Ferlitsch A; Waldmann E; Irina G; Daniel P; Asaturi A; Hinterberger A; Majcher B; Szymanska A; Trauner M; Ferlitsch M
Gastrointest Endosc; 2020 Jan; 91(1):135-141. PubMed ID: 31499041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. High quality of screening colonoscopy in Austria is not dependent on endoscopist specialty or setting.
Kozbial K; Reinhart K; Heinze G; Zwatz C; Bannert C; Salzl P; Waldmann E; Britto-Arias M; Ferlitsch A; Trauner M; Weiss W; Ferlitsch M
Endoscopy; 2015 Mar; 47(3):207-16. PubMed ID: 25412094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Adenoma Detection Rate in Colonoscopy: Is Indication a Predictor?
Yang PF; Wong SW
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2016 Apr; 26(2):156-61. PubMed ID: 26813239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Usefulness of mean number of adenomas per positive screenee for identifying meticulous endoscopists among those who achieve acceptable adenoma detection rates.
Aniwan S; Vanduangden K; Kerr SJ; Wisedopas N; Kongtab N; Kullavanijaya P; Rerknimitr R
Endoscopy; 2021 Apr; 53(4):394-401. PubMed ID: 32544957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Evaluation of adenomas per colonoscopy and adenomas per positive participant as new quality parameters in screening colonoscopy.
Gessl I; Waldmann E; Penz D; Majcher B; Dokladanska A; Hinterberger A; Szymanska A; Ferlitsch A; Trauner M; Ferlitsch M
Gastrointest Endosc; 2019 Mar; 89(3):496-502. PubMed ID: 30138613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Simplifying Measurement of Adenoma Detection Rates for Colonoscopy.
Gawron AJ; Yao Y; Gupta S; Cole G; Whooley MA; Dominitz JA; Kaltenbach T
Dig Dis Sci; 2021 Sep; 66(9):3149-3155. PubMed ID: 33029706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Adenoma detection rates in colonoscopies for positive fecal immunochemical tests versus direct screening colonoscopies.
Wong JCT; Chiu HM; Kim HS; Byeon JS; Matsuda T; Kobayashi N; Wu DC; Ong DE; Sung JJY;
Gastrointest Endosc; 2019 Mar; 89(3):607-613.e1. PubMed ID: 30452915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Physician report cards and implementing standards of practice are both significantly associated with improved screening colonoscopy quality.
Keswani RN; Yadlapati R; Gleason KM; Ciolino JD; Manka M; O'Leary KJ; Barnard C; Pandolfino JE
Am J Gastroenterol; 2015 Aug; 110(8):1134-9. PubMed ID: 25869388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Adenoma detection rate in high-risk patients differs from that in average-risk patients.
Sanaka MR; Rai T; Navaneethan U; Gohel TD; Podugu A; Thota PN; Lopez R; Kiran RP; Burke CA
Gastrointest Endosc; 2016 Jan; 83(1):172-8. PubMed ID: 26024584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The role of endoscopist adenoma detection rate in in sex differences in colonoscopy findings: cross-sectional analysis of the SCREESCO randomized controlled trial.
Westerberg M; Holmberg L; Ekbom A; Metcalfe C; Steele R; Forsberg A
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2024 Apr; 59(4):503-511. PubMed ID: 38084729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Proposal of high-risk adenoma detection rate as an impactful, complementary quality indicator of colonoscopy.
Wadhwa V; Jobanputra Y; Al Taii H; Thota PN; Lopez R; Gurudu SR; Sanaka MR
Surg Endosc; 2020 Jan; 34(1):325-331. PubMed ID: 30927122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
