These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3469701)

  • 1. [Stress analysis of the deciduous tooth using the finite element method. 1. Width and depth of the occlusal cavity].
    Kato M; Kawahara S; Chikamori M; Watanabe M; Miyazaki T; Hieda T
    Shoni Shikagaku Zasshi; 1986; 24(3):438-49. PubMed ID: 3469701
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Stress analysis of the deciduous tooth using the finite element method. Part 2: Depth of the proximal wall of Class II cavity preparation].
    Kato M; Kawahara S; Himi Y; Miyazaki T; Hieda T
    Shoni Shikagaku Zasshi; 1987; 25(1):34-42. PubMed ID: 3506297
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Influence of restorative technique on the biomechanical behavior of endodontically treated maxillary premolars. Part II: strain measurement and stress distribution.
    Soares PV; Santos-Filho PC; Gomide HA; Araujo CA; Martins LR; Soares CJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):114-22. PubMed ID: 18262012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Modified cavity preparations for composite resins in primary molars.
    Paquette DE; Vann WF; Oldenburg TR; Leinfelder KF
    Pediatr Dent; 1983 Dec; 5(4):246-51. PubMed ID: 6587327
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Amalgam fillings in deciduous teeth].
    Sfondrini G; Bianchi S; Fraticelli P; Poggio C
    Dent Cadmos; 1982 Apr; 50(4):9-15. PubMed ID: 6959870
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Effects of different class II cavity designs on stresses in restoration].
    Xu X; Sun Z; Tao L; Xiong H
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2002 Nov; 37(6):446-8. PubMed ID: 12641960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Support of undermined occlusal enamel provided by restorative materials.
    Latino C; Troendle K; Summitt JB
    Quintessence Int; 2001 Apr; 32(4):287-91. PubMed ID: 12066648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Structural optimization of dental restorations using the principle of adaptive growth.
    Couegnat G; Fok SL; Cooper JE; Qualtrough AJ
    Dent Mater; 2006 Jan; 22(1):3-12. PubMed ID: 16061281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Composite resin restoration in posterior teeth. I. The trial manufacture of beveling burs for the composite resin cavity].
    Futatsuki M; Hirota K; Takita K; Hamano Y; Nakata M
    Shoni Shikagaku Zasshi; 1985; 23(3):695-701. PubMed ID: 3869310
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Quantitative and qualitative evaluation of the stress occurring in a silver amalgam restoration by the finite element method].
    Corrêa AA; Matson E
    Rev Fac Odontol Sao Paulo; 1977; 15(1):19-26. PubMed ID: 289129
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Influence of occlusion on the degradation of posterior composite resins.
    Leinfelder KF; Small B
    Dent Today; 1998 Nov; 17(11):44-50. PubMed ID: 10752417
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Residual shrinkage stress distributions in molars after composite restoration.
    Versluis A; Tantbirojn D; Pintado MR; DeLong R; Douglas WH
    Dent Mater; 2004 Jul; 20(6):554-64. PubMed ID: 15134943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The influence of a packable resin composite, conventional resin composite and amalgam on molar cuspal stiffness.
    Molinaro JD; Diefenderfer KE; Strother JM
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(5):516-24. PubMed ID: 12216572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Composite resins in posterior teeth.
    Leinfelder KF
    Dent Clin North Am; 1981 Apr; 25(2):357-64. PubMed ID: 6941907
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bonded amalgam restorations: using a glass-ionomer as an adhesive liner.
    Chen RS; Liu CC; Cheng MR; Lin CP
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(5):411-7. PubMed ID: 11203849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Combining structural-thermal coupled field FE analysis and the Taguchi method to evaluate the relative contributions of multi-factors in a premolar adhesive MOD restoration.
    Lin CL; Chang YH; Lin YF
    J Dent; 2008 Aug; 36(8):626-36. PubMed ID: 18550252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fracture resistance of five pin-retained core build-up materials on teeth with and without extracoronal preparation.
    Burke FJ; Shaglouf AG; Combe EC; Wilson NH
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(5):388-94. PubMed ID: 11203847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Load-induced stresses in photoelastic primary canines with facial restorations.
    Rabitz GK; Berson R; Caputo AA; Franklin RJ; Del Fierro DB
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2006; 73(3):170-4. PubMed ID: 17367035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Restorative treatment in pediatric dentistry].
    Escobar F; Chainale T; Muñoz N; Rozas I; Werner A
    Rev Dent Chile; 1990 Apr; 81(1):38-47. PubMed ID: 2218026
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influence of restorative technique on the biomechanical behavior of endodontically treated maxillary premolars. Part I: fracture resistance and fracture mode.
    Soares PV; Santos-Filho PC; Martins LR; Soares CJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Jan; 99(1):30-7. PubMed ID: 18182183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.