BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34697432)

  • 1. Comparison of Retzius-sparing and conventional robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy regarding continence and sexual function: an updated meta-analysis.
    Liu J; Zhang J; Yang Z; Liu Q; Zhang W; Qing Z; Wang D
    Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2022 Mar; 25(1):47-54. PubMed ID: 34697432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Retzius Sparing Radical Prostatectomy Versus Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Which Technique Is More Beneficial for Prostate Cancer Patients (MASTER Study)? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Barakat B; Othman H; Gauger U; Wolff I; Hadaschik B; Rehme C
    Eur Urol Focus; 2022 Jul; 8(4):1060-1071. PubMed ID: 34429272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Surgical and functional outcomes of Retzius-sparing robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy versus conventional robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy in patients with biopsy-confirmed prostate cancer. Are outcomes worth it? Systematic review and meta-analysis.
    O'Connor-Cordova MA; Macías AGO; Sancen-Herrera JP; Altamirano-Lamarque F; Vargas Del Toro A; Peddinani BK; Canal-Zarate P; O'Connor-Juarez MA
    Prostate; 2023 Nov; 83(15):1395-1414. PubMed ID: 37555617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Outcomes of Retzius-sparing versus conventional robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: A KSER update series systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Chung DY; Jung HD; Kim DK; Lee MH; Lee SW; Paick S; Lee JY; Jeon SH
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(5):e0268182. PubMed ID: 35617274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Retzius-sparing Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy Leads to Durable Improvement in Urinary Function and Quality of Life Versus Standard Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy Without Compromise on Oncologic Efficacy: Single-surgeon Series and Step-by-step Guide.
    Egan J; Marhamati S; Carvalho FLF; Davis M; O'Neill J; Lee H; Lynch JH; Hankins RA; Hu JC; Kowalczyk KJ
    Eur Urol; 2021 Jun; 79(6):839-857. PubMed ID: 32536488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
    Ficarra V; Novara G; Rosen RC; Artibani W; Carroll PR; Costello A; Menon M; Montorsi F; Patel VR; Stolzenburg JU; Van der Poel H; Wilson TG; Zattoni F; Mottrie A
    Eur Urol; 2012 Sep; 62(3):405-17. PubMed ID: 22749852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy vs the standard approach: a systematic review and analysis of comparative outcomes.
    Checcucci E; Veccia A; Fiori C; Amparore D; Manfredi M; Di Dio M; Morra I; Galfano A; Autorino R; Bocciardi AM; Dasgupta P; Porpiglia F
    BJU Int; 2020 Jan; 125(1):8-16. PubMed ID: 31373142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Retzius sparing robotic assisted radical prostatectomy vs. conventional robotic assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Phukan C; Mclean A; Nambiar A; Mukherjee A; Somani B; Krishnamoorthy R; Sridhar A; Rajan P; Sooriakumaran P; Rai BP
    World J Urol; 2020 May; 38(5):1123-1134. PubMed ID: 31089802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of Retzius sparing on robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: a systematic review with meta-analysis.
    Tai TE; Wu CC; Kang YN; Wu JC
    Surg Endosc; 2020 Sep; 34(9):4020-4029. PubMed ID: 31617093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer: the first separate systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials and non-randomised studies.
    Ma J; Xu W; Chen R; Zhu Y; Wang Y; Cao W; Ju G; Ren J; Ye X; He Q; Chang Y; Ren S
    Int J Surg; 2023 May; 109(5):1350-1359. PubMed ID: 37070788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Retzius-sparing versus standard robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy for the treatment of clinically localized prostate cancer.
    Rosenberg JE; Jung JH; Edgerton Z; Lee H; Lee S; Bakker CJ; Dahm P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2020 Aug; 8(8):CD013641. PubMed ID: 32813279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial Examining the Impact of the Retzius-sparing Approach on Early Urinary Continence Recovery After Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy.
    Dalela D; Jeong W; Prasad MA; Sood A; Abdollah F; Diaz M; Karabon P; Sammon J; Jamil M; Baize B; Simone A; Menon M
    Eur Urol; 2017 Nov; 72(5):677-685. PubMed ID: 28483330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting potency rates after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
    Ficarra V; Novara G; Ahlering TE; Costello A; Eastham JA; Graefen M; Guazzoni G; Menon M; Mottrie A; Patel VR; Van der Poel H; Rosen RC; Tewari AK; Wilson TG; Zattoni F; Montorsi F
    Eur Urol; 2012 Sep; 62(3):418-30. PubMed ID: 22749850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of Retzius-Sparing Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy vs. Conventional Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: An Up-to-Date Meta-Analysis.
    Xu JN; Xu ZY; Yin HM
    Front Surg; 2021; 8():738421. PubMed ID: 34660680
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [An evidence-based analysis comparing two approaches of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the standard technique and Retzius-sparing technique].
    Wang MC; Zhang YY; Yu SC; Zhu SB; Xu L; Ni KX; Cheng S; Ding GQ; Li GH
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2021 Apr; 101(15):1083-1087. PubMed ID: 33878836
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Pelvic Anatomical Features After Retzius-Sparing Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy Intended for Early Recovery of Urinary Symptoms.
    Ota Y; Hamamoto S; Matsuyama N; Hamakawa T; Iwatsuki S; Etani T; Taguchi K; Naiki T; Ando R; Nakane A; Okada A; Kawai N; Kubota Y; Yasui T
    J Endourol; 2021 Mar; 35(3):296-304. PubMed ID: 32935558
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of Retzius-sparing versus standard robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.
    Tahra A; Sen UT; Sobay R; İnkaya A; Kucuk EV; Boylu U
    Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed); 2022 Jun; 46(5):293-300. PubMed ID: 35221232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Transperitoneal versus extraperitoneal robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer].
    Hua CZ; Cai ZL; Li WJ; Zhou C; Wei XP; Lü HD; Zhou FH
    Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2017 Jun; 23(6):540-549. PubMed ID: 29722948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Laparoscopic and robotic-assisted versus open radical prostatectomy for the treatment of localised prostate cancer.
    Ilic D; Evans SM; Allan CA; Jung JH; Murphy D; Frydenberg M
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2017 Sep; 9(9):CD009625. PubMed ID: 28895658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy Is More Beneficial for Prostate Cancer Patients: A System Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Du Y; Long Q; Guan B; Mu L; Tian J; Jiang Y; Bai X; Wu D
    Med Sci Monit; 2018 Jan; 24():272-287. PubMed ID: 29332100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.