These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34698716)

  • 1. In Vitro Analysis of Microbiologic Sealing of Two Different Fixed Implant-Supported Prosthesis Designs Cemented By Four Different Dental Cements.
    Saleh M; Taşar-Faruk S; Güvenir M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2021; 36(5):910-916. PubMed ID: 34698716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparing the marginal leakage and retention of implant-supported restorations cemented by four different dental cements.
    Saleh M; Taşar-Faruk S
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2019 Dec; 21(6):1181-1188. PubMed ID: 31692215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Retrievability of implant-retained crowns following cementation.
    Mehl C; Harder S; Wolfart M; Kern M; Wolfart S
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Dec; 19(12):1304-11. PubMed ID: 19040447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Retention of CAD/CAM all-ceramic crowns on prefabricated implant abutments: an in vitro comparative study of luting agents and abutment surface area.
    Carnaggio TV; Conrad R; Engelmeier RL; Gerngross P; Paravina R; Perezous L; Powers JM
    J Prosthodont; 2012 Oct; 21(7):523-8. PubMed ID: 22469271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of abutment height and surface roughness on in vitro retention of three luting agents.
    Cano-Batalla J; Soliva-Garriga J; Campillo-Funollet M; Munoz-Viveros CA; Giner-Tarrida L
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 22299076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Retentiveness of various luting agents used with implant-supported prosthesis: an in vitro study.
    Garg P; Pujari M; Prithviraj DR; Khare S
    J Oral Implantol; 2014 Dec; 40(6):649-54. PubMed ID: 25506659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparative evaluation of casting retention using the ITI solid abutment with six cements.
    Mansour A; Ercoli C; Graser G; Tallents R; Moss M
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2002 Aug; 13(4):343-8. PubMed ID: 12175370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of the amount of excess cement around the margins of cement-retained dental implant restorations: the effect of the cement application method.
    Chee WW; Duncan J; Afshar M; Moshaverinia A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Apr; 109(4):216-21. PubMed ID: 23566601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Retention of implant-supported zirconium oxide ceramic restorations using different luting agents.
    Nejatidanesh F; Savabi O; Shahtoosi M
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Aug; 24 Suppl A100():20-4. PubMed ID: 22092303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation and comparison of the film thicknesses of six temporary cements before and after thermal cycling.
    Gumus HO; Kurtulus IL; Kuru E
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2018 Dec; 21(12):1656-1661. PubMed ID: 30560832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An evaluation of retention and marginal seating of Ni-Cr alloy cast restorations using three different luting cements: an in vitro study.
    Pattanaik BK; Nagda SJ
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(1):20-5. PubMed ID: 22842244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. What is the Best Available Luting Agent for Implant Prosthesis?
    Almehmadi N; Kutkut A; Al-Sabbagh M
    Dent Clin North Am; 2019 Jul; 63(3):531-545. PubMed ID: 31097143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Retention of luting agents used for implant-supported restorations: A comparative
    Aladag A; Sahan MH; Akkus NO; Aktas R
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2020 Aug; 23(8):1073-1078. PubMed ID: 32788484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Retentiveness of dental cements used with metallic implant components.
    Squier RS; Agar JR; Duncan JP; Taylor TD
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(6):793-8. PubMed ID: 11769829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cement selection for cement-retained crown technique with dental implants.
    Sheets JL; Wilcox C; Wilwerding T
    J Prosthodont; 2008 Feb; 17(2):92-96. PubMed ID: 17971122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of collar height of definitive restoration and type of luting cement on the amount of residual cement in implant restorations: A clinical study.
    Ayyadanveettil P; Thavakkara V; Koodakkadavath S; Thavakkal A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Jan; 129(1):109-115. PubMed ID: 34116840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Effect of Temporary Cement Cleaning Methods on the Retention of Crowns.
    Song MY; An H; Park EJ
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Jan; 28(1):e210-e215. PubMed ID: 28598530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influence of abutment height and thermocycling on retrievability of cemented implant-supported crowns.
    Mehl C; Harder S; Shahriari A; Steiner M; Kern M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(5):1106-15. PubMed ID: 23057023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence of cement type and ceramic primer on retention of polymer-infiltrated ceramic crowns to a one-piece zirconia implant.
    Rohr N; Brunner S; Märtin S; Fischer J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Jan; 119(1):138-145. PubMed ID: 28461047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effects of abutment taper, length and cement type on resistance to dislodgement of cement-retained, implant-supported restorations.
    Bernal G; Okamura M; Muñoz CA
    J Prosthodont; 2003 Jun; 12(2):111-5. PubMed ID: 12964683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.