These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34699034)

  • 1. Comparison of 2D 4K vs. 3D HD laparoscopic imaging systems using a pelvitrainer model: a randomized controlled study.
    Zwimpfer TA; Wismer C; Fellmann-Fischer B; Geiger J; Schötzau A; Heinzelmann-Schwarz V
    Updates Surg; 2022 Jun; 74(3):1137-1147. PubMed ID: 34699034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect on surgical skills of expert surgeons using 3D/HD and 2D/4K resolution monitors in laparoscopic phantom tasks.
    Harada H; Kanaji S; Hasegawa H; Yamamoto M; Matsuda Y; Yamashita K; Matsuda T; Oshikiri T; Sumi Y; Nakamura T; Suzuki S; Kakeji Y
    Surg Endosc; 2018 Oct; 32(10):4228-4234. PubMed ID: 29603005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of 2D 4K vs. 3D HD laparoscopic imaging systems in bariatric surgery: study protocol for a randomized controlled prospective trial.
    Zwimpfer TA; Stiegeler N; Müller PC; Schötzau A; Fellmann-Fischer B; Heinzelmann-Schwarz V; Peterli R; Kraljević M
    Trials; 2024 Feb; 25(1):140. PubMed ID: 38389113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of two-dimensional high-definition, ultra high-definition and three-dimensional endovision systems: an ex-vivo randomised study.
    Bhattacharjee HK; Chaliyadan S; Mishra AK; Agarwal H; Suhani S; Joshi M; Parshad R
    Surg Endosc; 2021 Sep; 35(9):5328-5337. PubMed ID: 32959182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A laparoscopic study investigating 3D vs 2D imaging systems using a pelvitrainer model with experts, non-experts, and students.
    Zwimpfer TA; Lacher D; Fellmann-Fischer B; Mueller M
    BMC Surg; 2020 Nov; 20(1):276. PubMed ID: 33167972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Learning Laparoscopic Surgery Skills With a 4K Ultra-High Definition 2D vs a Three-Dimensional HD Laparoscopic System: Results From a Prospective Randomized Trial.
    Thomaschewski M; Jürgens T; Keck T; Laubert T; Benecke C
    Surg Innov; 2021 Dec; 28(6):760-767. PubMed ID: 33530845
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. 2D Versus 3D in Laparoscopic Surgery by Beginners and Experts: A Randomized Controlled Trial on a Pelvitrainer in Objectively Graded Surgical Steps.
    Spille J; Wenners A; von Hehn U; Maass N; Pecks U; Mettler L; Alkatout I
    J Surg Educ; 2017; 74(5):867-877. PubMed ID: 28215494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Acquiring basic and advanced laparoscopic skills in novices using two-dimensional (2D), three-dimensional (3D) and ultra-high definition (4K) vision systems: A randomized control study.
    Abdelrahman M; Belramman A; Salem R; Patel B
    Int J Surg; 2018 May; 53():333-338. PubMed ID: 29656132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Application Value of 4K High-Definition System in Laparoscopic Gastrectomy: Preliminary Results and Initial Experience.
    Zhang L; Hong H; Zang L; Dong F; Lu A; Feng B; He Z; Xue P; Cai Z; Zheng M; Ma J
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2022 Feb; 32(2):137-141. PubMed ID: 33970027
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Three-dimensional imaging improved the laparoscopic performance of inexperienced operators: a prospective trial.
    Kanaji S; Watanabe R; Mascagni P; Trauzettel F; Urade T; Longo F; Guerriero L; Perretta S; Dallemagne B; Kakeji Y; Marescaux J
    Surg Endosc; 2020 Nov; 34(11):5083-5091. PubMed ID: 31811456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Learning Pattern of Two-Dimensional, Three-Dimensional, and Ultra-High-Definition Endovision System on Standardized Phantom Tasks: An
    Bhattacharjee HK; Agarwal H; Singla V; Chaliyadan S; Mishra AK; Suhani S; Joshi M; Parshad R
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2021 Oct; ():. PubMed ID: 34677083
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. 3D HD versus 2D HD: surgical task efficiency in standardised phantom tasks.
    Storz P; Buess GF; Kunert W; Kirschniak A
    Surg Endosc; 2012 May; 26(5):1454-60. PubMed ID: 22179446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. 3D vs. 4K Display System - Influence of "State-of-the-art"-Display Technique On Surgical Performance (IDOSP-Study) in minimally invasive surgery: protocol for a randomized cross-over trial.
    Wahba R; Datta RR; Hedergott A; Bußhoff J; Bruns T; Kleinert R; Dieplinger G; Fuchs H; Gietzelt C; Möller D; Hellmich M; Bruns CJ; Stippel DL
    Trials; 2019 May; 20(1):299. PubMed ID: 31138290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Three-Dimensional (3D) Laparoscopy Versus Two-Dimensional (2D) Laparoscopy: A Single-Surgeon Prospective Randomized Comparative Study.
    Wang Z; Liang J; Chen J; Mei S; Liu Q
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2020 Oct; 21(10):2883-2887. PubMed ID: 33112544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Transferability of laparoscopic skills acquired from three-dimensional high-definition and ultra-high definition endovision system to two-dimensional high-definition endovision system: an ex-vivo randomized study.
    Bhattacharjee HK; Yadav S; Mishra AK; Suhani S; Joshi M; Parshad R
    Updates Surg; 2024 Oct; 76(6):2461-2470. PubMed ID: 38507178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Gender benefit in laparoscopic surgical performance using a 3D-display system: data from a randomized cross-over trial.
    Busshoff J; Datta RR; Bruns T; Kleinert R; Morgenstern B; Pfister D; Chiapponi C; Fuchs HF; Thomas M; Gietzelt C; Hedergott A; Möller D; Hellmich M; Bruns CJ; Stippel DL; Wahba R
    Surg Endosc; 2022 Jun; 36(6):4376-4385. PubMed ID: 34750707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. 3D Versus 4K Display System - Influence of "State-of-the-art"-Display Technique on Surgical Performance (IDOSP-study) in Minimally Invasive Surgery: A Randomized Cross-over Trial.
    Wahba R; Datta R; Bußhoff J; Bruns T; Hedergott A; Gietzelt C; Dieplinger G; Fuchs H; Morgenstern B; Möller D; Hellmich M; Bruns CJ; Stippel DL
    Ann Surg; 2020 Nov; 272(5):709-714. PubMed ID: 32833763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Skills Comparison in Pediatric Residents Using a 2-Dimensional versus a 3-Dimensional High-Definition Camera in a Pediatric Laparoscopic Simulator.
    Guanà R; Ferrero L; Garofalo S; Cerrina A; Cussa D; Arezzo A; Schleef J
    J Surg Educ; 2017; 74(4):644-649. PubMed ID: 28039097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Three-dimensional laparoscopic imaging improves surgical performance on standardized ex-vivo laparoscopic tasks.
    Honeck P; Wendt-Nordahl G; Rassweiler J; Knoll T
    J Endourol; 2012 Aug; 26(8):1085-8. PubMed ID: 22721451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of three-dimensional (3D) endovision system versus ultra-high-definition 4K endovision system in minimally invasive surgical procedures: a randomized-open label pilot study.
    Parshad R; Nanjakla Jayappa S; Bhattacharjee HK; Suhani S; Joshi MK; Bhoi D; Kashyap L
    Surg Endosc; 2022 Feb; 36(2):1106-1116. PubMed ID: 33638108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.