These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34699299)

  • 1. Inferring Latent Structure in Polytomous Data with a Higher-Order Diagnostic Model.
    Culpepper SA; Balamuta JJ
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2023; 58(2):368-386. PubMed ID: 34699299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An Exploratory Diagnostic Model for Ordinal Responses with Binary Attributes: Identifiability and Estimation.
    Culpepper SA
    Psychometrika; 2019 Dec; 84(4):921-940. PubMed ID: 31432312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Restricted Latent Class Models for Nominal Response Data: Identifiability and Estimation.
    Liu Y; Culpepper SA
    Psychometrika; 2024 Jun; 89(2):592-625. PubMed ID: 38114767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Extending exploratory diagnostic classification models: Inferring the effect of covariates.
    Yigit HD; Culpepper SA
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2023 May; 76(2):372-401. PubMed ID: 36601975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Inferring the Number of Attributes for the Exploratory DINA Model.
    Chen Y; Liu Y; Culpepper SA; Chen Y
    Psychometrika; 2021 Mar; 86(1):30-64. PubMed ID: 33751367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A Sparse Latent Class Model for Cognitive Diagnosis.
    Chen Y; Culpepper S; Liang F
    Psychometrika; 2020 Mar; 85(1):121-153. PubMed ID: 31927684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sufficient and Necessary Conditions for the Identifiability of DINA Models with Polytomous Responses.
    Lin M; Xu G
    Psychometrika; 2024 Jun; 89(2):717-740. PubMed ID: 38517594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Exploratory Restricted Latent Class Models with Monotonicity Requirements under PÒLYA-GAMMA Data Augmentation.
    Balamuta JJ; Culpepper SA
    Psychometrika; 2022 Sep; 87(3):903-945. PubMed ID: 35023017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Multilevel IRT using dichotomous and polytomous response data.
    Fox JP
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2005 May; 58(Pt 1):145-72. PubMed ID: 15969844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Advancing the Bayesian Approach for Multidimensional Polytomous and Nominal IRT Models: Model Formulations and Fit Measures.
    Chen J
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2017 Jan; 41(1):3-16. PubMed ID: 29881075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bayesian Estimation of the DINA Q matrix.
    Chen Y; Culpepper SA; Chen Y; Douglas J
    Psychometrika; 2018 Mar; 83(1):89-108. PubMed ID: 28861685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A Sequential Response Model for Analyzing Process Data on Technology-Based Problem-Solving Tasks.
    Han Y; Liu H; Ji F
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2022; 57(6):960-977. PubMed ID: 34224276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bayesian multivariate growth curve latent class models for mixed outcomes.
    Leiby BE; Ten Have TR; Lynch KG; Sammel MD
    Stat Med; 2014 Sep; 33(20):3434-52. PubMed ID: 22961883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bayesian Comparison of Latent Variable Models: Conditional Versus Marginal Likelihoods.
    Merkle EC; Furr D; Rabe-Hesketh S
    Psychometrika; 2019 Sep; 84(3):802-829. PubMed ID: 31297664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Supervised Bayesian latent class models for high-dimensional data.
    Desantis SM; Houseman EA; Coull BA; Nutt CL; Betensky RA
    Stat Med; 2012 Jun; 31(13):1342-60. PubMed ID: 22495652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Taxometrics, polytomous constructs, and the comparison curve fit index: a Monte Carlo analysis.
    Walters GD; McGrath RE; Knight RA
    Psychol Assess; 2010 Mar; 22(1):149-56. PubMed ID: 20230161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Bayes Factors for Evaluating Latent Monotonicity in Polytomous Item Response Theory Models.
    Tijmstra J; Bolsinova M
    Psychometrika; 2019 Sep; 84(3):846-869. PubMed ID: 30793230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bayesian analysis of transformation latent variable models with multivariate censored data.
    Song XY; Pan D; Liu PF; Cai JH
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2016 Oct; 25(5):2337-2358. PubMed ID: 24535555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A latent topic model with Markov transition for process data.
    Xu H; Fang G; Ying Z
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2020 Nov; 73(3):474-505. PubMed ID: 31912906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cognitive diagnosis modelling incorporating item response times.
    Zhan P; Jiao H; Liao D
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2018 May; 71(2):262-286. PubMed ID: 28872185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.