These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34699433)

  • 1. The Plane of Mesh Placement Does Not Impact Abdominal Donor Site Complications in Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction.
    Henn D; Sivaraj D; Barrera JA; Lin JQ; Chattopadhyay A; Maan ZN; Chen K; Nguyen A; Cheesborough J; Gurtner GC; Lee GK; Nazerali R
    Ann Plast Surg; 2021 Nov; 87(5):542-546. PubMed ID: 34699433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Inclusion of mesh in donor-site repair of free TRAM and muscle-sparing free TRAM flaps yields rates of abdominal complications comparable to those of DIEP flap reconstruction.
    Wan DC; Tseng CY; Anderson-Dam J; Dalio AL; Crisera CA; Festekjian JH
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2010 Aug; 126(2):367-374. PubMed ID: 20679822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of Obesity on Postoperative Complications After Breast Reconstruction Using Free Muscle-Sparing Transverse Rectus Abdominis Myocutaneous, Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator, and Superficial Inferior Epigastric Artery Flap: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Lee KT; Mun GH
    Ann Plast Surg; 2016 May; 76(5):576-84. PubMed ID: 25536199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Use of Semi-Absorbable Mesh and its Impact on Donor-Site Morbidity and Patient-Reported Outcomes in DIEP Flap Breast Reconstruction.
    Siegwart LC; Sieber L; Fischer S; Diehm Y; Hirche C; Kneser U; Kotsougiani-Fischer D
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2021 Jun; 45(3):907-916. PubMed ID: 33469702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A cost-effectiveness analysis of DIEP vs free MS-TRAM flap for microsurgical breast reconstruction.
    Tan MG; Isaranuwatchai W; DeLyzer T; Butler K; Hofer SOP; O'Neill AC; Zhong T
    J Surg Oncol; 2019 Mar; 119(3):388-396. PubMed ID: 30562406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Risk factors for abdominal donor-site morbidity in free flap breast reconstruction.
    Vyas RM; Dickinson BP; Fastekjian JH; Watson JP; DaLio AL; Crisera CA
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2008 May; 121(5):1519-1526. PubMed ID: 18453973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Breast reconstruction with superficial inferior epigastric artery flaps: a prospective comparison with TRAM and DIEP flaps.
    Chevray PM
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2004 Oct; 114(5):1077-83; discussion 1084-5. PubMed ID: 15457015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Double pedicle deep inferior epigastric perforator/muscle-sparing TRAM flaps for unilateral breast reconstruction.
    Agarwal JP; Gottlieb LJ
    Ann Plast Surg; 2007 Apr; 58(4):359-63. PubMed ID: 17413875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Complications and Patient-Reported Outcomes after Abdominally Based Breast Reconstruction: Results of the Mastectomy Reconstruction Outcomes Consortium Study.
    Erdmann-Sager J; Wilkins EG; Pusic AL; Qi J; Hamill JB; Kim HM; Guldbrandsen GE; Chun YS
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2018 Feb; 141(2):271-281. PubMed ID: 29019862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reinforcement of the abdominal wall with acellular dermal matrix or synthetic mesh after breast reconstruction with the pedicled transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap. A prospective double-blind randomized study.
    Brunbjerg ME; Jensen TB; Christiansen P; Overgaard J; Engberg Damsgaard T
    J Plast Surg Hand Surg; 2021 Aug; 55(4):202-209. PubMed ID: 33356728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Postoperative Abdominal Bulge and Hernia Rates in Patients Undergoing Abdominally Based Autologous Breast Reconstruction: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Espinosa-de-Los-Monteros A; Frias-Frias R; Alvarez-Tostado-Rivera A; Caralampio-Castro A; Llanes S; Saldivar A
    Ann Plast Surg; 2021 Apr; 86(4):476-484. PubMed ID: 33720921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of morbidity, functional outcome, and satisfaction following bilateral TRAM versus bilateral DIEP flap breast reconstruction.
    Chun YS; Sinha I; Turko A; Yueh JH; Lipsitz S; Pribaz JJ; Lee BT
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2010 Oct; 126(4):1133-1141. PubMed ID: 20555301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of donor-site morbidity of SIEA, DIEP, and muscle-sparing TRAM flaps for breast reconstruction.
    Wu LC; Bajaj A; Chang DW; Chevray PM
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2008 Sep; 122(3):702-709. PubMed ID: 18766032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Myosonographic evaluation of rectus abdominis muscle function after DIEP flap breast reconstruction].
    Kässmann C; Peek A; Luxenhofer F; Scheufler O; Exner K
    Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir; 2002 Nov; 34(6):386-94. PubMed ID: 12601605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of Outcomes following Autologous Breast Reconstruction Using the DIEP and Pedicled TRAM Flaps: A 12-Year Clinical Retrospective Study and Literature Review.
    Knox ADC; Ho AL; Leung L; Tashakkor AY; Lennox PA; Van Laeken N; Macadam SA
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2016 Jul; 138(1):16-28. PubMed ID: 26267400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quality of Life and Patient-Reported Outcomes in Breast Cancer Survivors: A Multicenter Comparison of Four Abdominally Based Autologous Reconstruction Methods.
    Macadam SA; Zhong T; Weichman K; Papsdorf M; Lennox PA; Hazen A; Matros E; Disa J; Mehrara B; Pusic AL
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2016 Mar; 137(3):758-771. PubMed ID: 26910656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparing the donor-site morbidity using DIEP, SIEA or MS-TRAM flaps for breast reconstructive surgery: a meta-analysis.
    Egeberg A; Rasmussen MK; Sørensen JA
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2012 Nov; 65(11):1474-80. PubMed ID: 22841854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Versus Free Transverse Rectus Abdominis Myocutaneous Flap: Complications and Resource Utilization.
    Zoghbi Y; Gerth DJ; Tashiro J; Golpanian S; Thaller SR
    Ann Plast Surg; 2017 May; 78(5):516-520. PubMed ID: 28052051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Transversus abdominis plane (TAP) catheters inserted under direct vision in the donor site following free DIEP and MS-TRAM breast reconstruction: a prospective cohort study of 45 patients.
    Zhong T; Wong KW; Cheng H; Ojha M; Srinivas C; McCluskey SA; Clarke H; Jacks L; Hofer SO
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2013 Mar; 66(3):329-36. PubMed ID: 23142025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Morbidity of the Donor Site and Complication Rates of Breast Reconstruction with Autologous Abdominal Flaps: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Breast J; ; . PubMed ID: 35847769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.