These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34703018)

  • 1. Why hundreds of scientists are weighing in on a high-stakes US abortion case.
    Maxmen A
    Nature; 2021 Nov; 599(7884):187-189. PubMed ID: 34703018
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Update on Reproductive Rights and Women's Mental Health.
    Stotland NL
    Med Clin North Am; 2019 Jul; 103(4):751-766. PubMed ID: 31078205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Stenberg v Carhart: a divided US Supreme Court debates partial birth abortion.
    Heffernan L
    Mod Law Rev; 2001 Jul; 64(4):618-27. PubMed ID: 16538739
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The abortion right, originalism, and the Fourteenth Amendment.
    Graines S; Wyatt J
    Clevel State Law Rev; 1999; 47(2):161-91. PubMed ID: 12715815
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. After Ayotte: the need to defend abortion rights with renewed "purpose.".
    Harv Law Rev; 2006 Jun; 119(8):2552-73. PubMed ID: 16827220
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Requests for Self-managed Medication Abortion Provided Using Online Telemedicine in 30 US States Before and After the Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization Decision.
    Aiken ARA; Starling JE; Scott JG; Gomperts R
    JAMA; 2022 Nov; 328(17):1768-1770. PubMed ID: 36318139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Supreme Court and abortion rights.
    Annas GJ
    N Engl J Med; 2007 May; 356(21):2201-7. PubMed ID: 17476003
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. After Roe v. Wade: US researchers warn of what's to come.
    Lenharo M
    Nature; 2022 Jul; 607(7917):15-16. PubMed ID: 35750925
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Partial-birth abortion: should moral judgment prevail over medical judgment?
    Walther KE
    Loyola Univ Chic Law J; 2000; 31(4):693-736. PubMed ID: 11962531
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Identifying Causal Effects of Reproductive Health Improvements on Women's Economic Empowerment Through the Population Poverty Research Initiative.
    Finlay JE; Lee MA
    Milbank Q; 2018 Jun; 96(2):300-322. PubMed ID: 29870117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Air Force women's access to abortion services and the erosion of 10 U.S.C., section 1093.
    Wilde ML
    William Mary J Women Law; 2003; 9(3):351-412. PubMed ID: 15977327
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Abortion access for incarcerated women: are correctional health practices in conflict with constitutional standards.
    Kasdan D
    Perspect Sex Reprod Health; 2009 Mar; 41(1):59-62. PubMed ID: 19291130
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Brief supports partial-birth abortion ban.
    Catholic Church. United States Conference of Catholic Bishops [USCCB]
    Origins; 2006 Jun; 36(4):58-63. PubMed ID: 16832962
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. New York v. Sullivan: shhh ... don't say the "a" word! Another outcome-oriented abortion decision.
    Kendall CC
    John Marshall Law Rev; 1990; 23(4):753-70. PubMed ID: 16622962
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sex selection abortion and the boomerang effect of a woman's right to choose: a paradox of the skeptics.
    Kohm LM
    William Mary J Women Law; 1997; 4(1):91-128. PubMed ID: 16389677
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Abortion and birth control--right to abortion and regulation thereof: the United States Supreme Court invalidates a statute banning partial birth abortions: Stenberg v. Carhart, 530 U.S. 914 (2000).
    Joersz M
    N D Law Rev; 2001; 77(2):345-73. PubMed ID: 12956123
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Abortion rights after South Dakota.
    McDonagh E
    Free Inq; 2006; 26(4):34-8. PubMed ID: 16830439
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The right's reasons: constitutional conflict and the spread of woman-protective antiabortion argument.
    Siegel RB
    Duke Law J; 2008 Apr; 57(6):1641-92. PubMed ID: 19108356
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Rethinking the mantra that abortion should be "safe, legal, and rare".
    Weitz TA
    J Womens Hist; 2010; 22(3):161-72. PubMed ID: 20857596
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The right to privacy: Roe v. Wade revisited.
    Smith PA
    Jurist; 1983; 43(2):289-317. PubMed ID: 16086474
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.