These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3470463)

  • 1. The influence of the condensation instrument on the clinical behaviour of amalgam restorations.
    Letzel H; van 't Hof MA; Vrijhoef MM
    J Oral Rehabil; 1987 Mar; 14(2):133-8. PubMed ID: 3470463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The influence of polishing on the marginal integrity of amalgam restorations.
    Letzel H; Vrijhoef MM
    J Oral Rehabil; 1984 Mar; 11(2):89-94. PubMed ID: 6585528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Long-term influences on marginal fracture of amalgam restorations.
    Letzel H; Vrijhoef MM
    J Oral Rehabil; 1984 Mar; 11(2):95-101. PubMed ID: 6585529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical longevity of extensive direct composite restorations in amalgam replacement: up to 3.5 years follow-up.
    Scholtanus JD; Ozcan M
    J Dent; 2014 Nov; 42(11):1404-10. PubMed ID: 24994619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical variables affecting the marginal degradation of amalgam restorations.
    Jokstad A; Mjör IA
    Acta Odontol Scand; 1990 Dec; 48(6):379-87. PubMed ID: 2288210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Preventive resin restorations vs. amalgam restorations: a three-year clinical study.
    Cloyd S; Gilpatrick RO; Moore D
    J Tenn Dent Assoc; 1997 Oct; 77(4):36-40. PubMed ID: 9520761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The integrity of bonded amalgam restorations: a clinical evaluation after five years.
    Mach Z; Regent J; Staninec M; Mrklas L; Setcos JC
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2002 Apr; 133(4):460-7; quiz 493. PubMed ID: 11991463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A two-year randomized, controlled clinical evaluation of bonded amalgam restorations.
    Setcos JC; Staninec M; Wilson NH
    J Adhes Dent; 1999; 1(4):323-31. PubMed ID: 11725662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Long-term evaluation and rerestoration of amalgam restorations.
    Akerboom HB; Advokaat JG; Van Amerongen WE; Borgmeijer PJ
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 1993 Feb; 21(1):45-8. PubMed ID: 8432106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The performance of bonded vs. pin-retained complex amalgam restorations: a five-year clinical evaluation.
    Summitt JB; Burgess JO; Berry TG; Robbins JW; Osborne JW; Haveman CW
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2001 Jul; 132(7):923-31. PubMed ID: 11480646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical evaluation of amalgam bonding in Class I and II restorations.
    Mahler DB; Engle JH
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2000 Jan; 131(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 10649871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The management of occlusal caries in permanent molars. A 5-year clinical trial comparing a minimal composite with an amalgam restoration.
    Welbury RR; Walls AW; Murray JJ; McCabe JF
    Br Dent J; 1990 Dec 8-22; 169(11):361-6. PubMed ID: 2275837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A controlled clinical study of amalgam restorations: survival, failures, and causes of failure.
    Letzel H; van 't Hof MA; Vrijhoef MM; Marshall GW; Marshall SJ
    Dent Mater; 1989 Mar; 5(2):115-21. PubMed ID: 2606273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The finishing and early marginal fracture of clinical amalgam restorations.
    Bryant RW; Collins CJ
    J Dent; 1989 Jun; 17(3):111-6. PubMed ID: 2768622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The influence of the amalgam alloy on the survival of amalgam restorations: a secondary analysis of multiple controlled clinical trials.
    Letzel H; van 't Hof MA; Marshall GW; Marshall SJ
    J Dent Res; 1997 Nov; 76(11):1787-98. PubMed ID: 9372797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A retrospective clinical study on longevity of posterior composite and amalgam restorations.
    Opdam NJ; Bronkhorst EM; Roeters JM; Loomans BA
    Dent Mater; 2007 Jan; 23(1):2-8. PubMed ID: 16417916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Adaptation and condensation of amalgam restorations in Class II preparations of conventional and conservative design.
    Duncalf WV; Wilson NH
    Quintessence Int; 1992 Jul; 23(7):499-504. PubMed ID: 1410252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Adhesively bonded versus non-bonded amalgam restorations for dental caries.
    Fedorowicz Z; Nasser M; Wilson N
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2009 Oct; (4):CD007517. PubMed ID: 19821423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Marginal fracture of posterior composite resins.
    Fukushima M; Setcos JC; Phillips RW
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1988 Oct; 117(5):577-83. PubMed ID: 3066806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinical evaluation of a compomer and an amalgam primary teeth class II restorations: a 2-year comparative study.
    Kavvadia K; Kakaboura A; Vanderas AP; Papagiannoulis L
    Pediatr Dent; 2004; 26(3):245-50. PubMed ID: 15185806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.