These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34704887)

  • 1. Remembering spatial words: Sensorimotor simulation affects verbal recognition memory.
    Kumcu A; Thompson RL
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2022 Sep; 75(9):1694-1710. PubMed ID: 34704887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Perceptual and conceptual cueing in implicit and explicit retrieval.
    Challis BH; Chiu CY; Kerr SA; Law J; Schneider L; Yonelinas A; Tulving E
    Memory; 1993 Jun; 1(2):127-51. PubMed ID: 7584262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cortical activation patterns during long-term memory retrieval of visually or haptically encoded objects and locations.
    Stock O; Röder B; Burke M; Bien S; Rösler F
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Jan; 21(1):58-82. PubMed ID: 18476766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The role of spatial location in remembering and forgetting peripheral words.
    Hourihan KL; Goldberg S; Taylor TL
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2007 Jun; 61(2):91-101. PubMed ID: 17665750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Modality Effects on Lexical Encoding and Memory Representations of Spoken Words.
    Bielski LM; Byom L; Seitz PF; Grant KW
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(4):825-837. PubMed ID: 31569118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Divided attention at encoding or retrieval interferes with emotionally enhanced memory for words.
    Yeung RC; Fernandes MA
    Memory; 2021 Mar; 29(3):284-297. PubMed ID: 33619990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Experiential traces first: Does holding a location in visuospatial working memory affect the processing of space-associated words?
    Tsaregorodtseva O; Kaup B
    Mem Cognit; 2024 May; 52(4):965-983. PubMed ID: 38193949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cross-modal binding in developmental dyslexia.
    Jones MW; Branigan HP; Parra MA; Logie RH
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Nov; 39(6):1807-1822. PubMed ID: 23773185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Selective attention and recognition: effects of congruency on episodic learning.
    Rosner TM; D'Angelo MC; MacLellan E; Milliken B
    Psychol Res; 2015 May; 79(3):411-24. PubMed ID: 24859839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of item distinctiveness on the retrieval of objects and object-location bindings from visual working memory.
    Markov YA; Utochkin IS
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2022 Oct; 84(7):2236-2254. PubMed ID: 35199322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. "Good is up" is not always better: a memory advantage for words in metaphor-incompatible locations.
    Crawford LE; Cohn SM; Kim AB
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(9):e108269. PubMed ID: 25259846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The properties of retrieval cues constrain the picture superiority effect.
    Weldon MS; Roediger HL; Challis BH
    Mem Cognit; 1989 Jan; 17(1):95-105. PubMed ID: 2913461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reorganization of spatial configurations in visual working memory: A matter of set size?
    Timm JD; Papenmeier F
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(11):e0225068. PubMed ID: 31721792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Attentional reorienting triggers spatial asymmetries in a search task with cross-modal spatial cueing.
    Paladini RE; Diana L; Zito GA; Nyffeler T; Wyss P; Mosimann UP; Müri RM; Nef T; Cazzoli D
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(1):e0190677. PubMed ID: 29293637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Getting more from visual working memory: Retro-cues enhance retrieval and protect from visual interference.
    Souza AS; Rerko L; Oberauer K
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Jun; 42(6):890-910. PubMed ID: 26752731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The relationship between study processing and the effects of cue congruency at retrieval: fMRI support for transfer appropriate processing.
    Park H; Rugg MD
    Cereb Cortex; 2008 Apr; 18(4):868-75. PubMed ID: 17652467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cross-Modal Interaction Between Auditory and Visual Input Impacts Memory Retrieval.
    Marian V; Hayakawa S; Schroeder SR
    Front Neurosci; 2021; 15():661477. PubMed ID: 34381328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. What forgetting tells us about remembering: the influence of top-down control on hemispheric asymmetries in verbal memory.
    Tat MJ; Azuma T
    Laterality; 2015; 20(2):171-90. PubMed ID: 25139497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Orienting attention to locations in internal representations.
    Griffin IC; Nobre AC
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2003 Nov; 15(8):1176-94. PubMed ID: 14709235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Incidentally encoded temporal associations produce priming in implicit memory.
    Mundorf AMD; Uitvlugt MG; Healey MK
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2024 Apr; 31(2):761-771. PubMed ID: 37715057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.