158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34705269)
21. Hysteroscopic proximal tubal occlusion versus laparoscopic salpingectomy as a treatment for hydrosalpinges prior to IVF or ICSI: an RCT.
Dreyer K; Lier MC; Emanuel MH; Twisk JW; Mol BW; Schats R; Hompes PG; Mijatovic V
Hum Reprod; 2016 Sep; 31(9):2005-16. PubMed ID: 27209341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Successful completion of total and partial salpingectomy at the time of cesarean delivery.
Lehn K; Gu L; Creinin MD; Chen MJ
Contraception; 2018 Sep; 98(3):232-236. PubMed ID: 29935148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Paradigm shift from tubal ligation to opportunistic salpingectomy at cesarean delivery in the United States.
Mandelbaum RS; Matsuzaki S; Sangara RN; Klar M; Matsushima K; Roman LD; Paulson RJ; Wright JD; Matsuo K
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Oct; 225(4):399.e1-399.e32. PubMed ID: 34181896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Spontaneous Pregnancy after Total Bilateral Salpingectomy: A Systematic Review of Literature.
Baltus T; Brown J; Molakatalla S; Kapurubandara S
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2022 Feb; 29(2):213-218. PubMed ID: 34592466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Regret in the Modern Contraceptive Landscape: Evaluating Regret in Patients Undergoing Tubal Ligation or Bilateral Salpingectomy for Contraception.
Rodowa MS; Waddington A; Pudwell J
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2024 May; 46(5):102362. PubMed ID: 38272216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Cost-effectiveness of opportunistic salpingectomy for ovarian cancer prevention.
Dilley SE; Havrilesky LJ; Bakkum-Gamez J; Cohn DE; Michael Straughn J; Caughey AB; Rodriguez MI
Gynecol Oncol; 2017 Aug; 146(2):373-379. PubMed ID: 28577884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Applicability, Safety, and Efficiency of Salpingectomy versus Electrocoagulation and Laparoscopic Tubal Section in Ambulatory.
Pereira JMA; Trocado VFB; Gomes SMS; Carlos-Alves M; Carvalho A; Pinheiro PA
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet; 2022 Sep; 44(9):866-870. PubMed ID: 36037814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Techniques for the interruption of tubal patency for female sterilisation.
Lawrie TA; Kulier R; Nardin JM
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2016 Aug; 2016(8):CD003034. PubMed ID: 27494193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Techniques for the interruption of tubal patency for female sterilisation.
Lawrie TA; Kulier R; Nardin JM
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2015 Sep; (9):CD003034. PubMed ID: 26343930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [Opportunistic Salpingectomy for Permanent Contraception: A Cross Sectional Study in Portugal].
São Pedro V; Pires R; Santos F; Tovim Rodrigues C; Santos Silva I; Almeida MC; Águas F
Acta Med Port; 2021 Mar; 34(4):258-265. PubMed ID: 34214417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Complete salpingectomy versus tubal ligation during cesarean section: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Yang M; Du Y; Hu Y
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2021 Nov; 34(22):3794-3802. PubMed ID: 31752570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Salpingectomy for Sterilization: Change in Practice in a Large Integrated Health Care System, 2011-2016.
Powell CB; Alabaster A; Simmons S; Garcia C; Martin M; McBride-Allen S; Littell RD
Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Nov; 130(5):961-967. PubMed ID: 29016486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The performance and safety of bilateral salpingectomy for ovarian cancer prevention in the United States.
Hanley GE; McAlpine JN; Pearce CL; Miller D
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Mar; 216(3):270.e1-270.e9. PubMed ID: 27810554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Postpartum Salpingectomy Compared With Standard Tubal Ligation After Vaginal Delivery.
Wagar MK; Godecker A; Landeros MV; Williams M
Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Mar; 137(3):514-520. PubMed ID: 33595245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Comparing options for women seeking permanent contraception in high-resource countries: a protocol for a systematic review.
Gormley R; Vickers B; Norman WV
Syst Rev; 2019 Mar; 8(1):74. PubMed ID: 30914067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Laparoscopic salpingectomy and removal of Essure hysteroscopic sterilisation device: a case series.
Johal T; Kuruba N; Sule M; Mukhopadhyay S; Raje G
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 2018 Jun; 23(3):227-230. PubMed ID: 29842838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Adoption of Complete Bilateral Salpingectomy for Permanent Contraception at Time of Cesarean Delivery in Rhode Island.
DiSilvestro JB; Raker CA; Velasquez J; Mathews CA
R I Med J (2013); 2023 Jun; 106(5):49-53. PubMed ID: 37195163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Salpingectomy, tubal ligation and hysteroscopic occlusion for sterilization.
Marchand GJ; Masoud AT; King AK; Brazil GM; Ulibarri HM; Parise JE; Arroyo AL; Coriell CL; Goetz SP; Moir CJ; Govindan ML
Minerva Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Oct; 74(5):452-461. PubMed ID: 35912465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Extending the safety evidence for opportunistic salpingectomy in prevention of ovarian cancer: a cohort study from British Columbia, Canada.
Hanley GE; Kwon JS; Finlayson SJ; Huntsman DG; Miller D; McAlpine JN
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Aug; 219(2):172.e1-172.e8. PubMed ID: 29852159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Efficacy and safety of sterilisation procedures to reduce the risk of epithelial ovarian cancer: a systematic review comparing salpingectomy with tubal ligation.
Magarakis L; Idahl A; Särnqvist C; Strandell A
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 2022 Jun; 27(3):230-239. PubMed ID: 34870544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
