330 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34705835)
1. 3D virtual reality vs. 2D desktop registration user interface comparison.
Bueckle A; Buehling K; Shih PC; Börner K
PLoS One; 2021; 16(10):e0258103. PubMed ID: 34705835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The HRA Organ Gallery affords immersive superpowers for building and exploring the Human Reference Atlas with virtual reality.
Bueckle A; Qing C; Luley S; Kumar Y; Pandey N; Börner K
Front Bioinform; 2023; 3():1162723. PubMed ID: 37181487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparing virtual reality, desktop-based 3D, and 2D versions of a category learning experiment.
Barrett RCA; Poe R; O'Camb JW; Woodruff C; Harrison SM; Dolguikh K; Chuong C; Klassen AD; Zhang R; Joseph RB; Blair MR
PLoS One; 2022; 17(10):e0275119. PubMed ID: 36201546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The HRA Organ Gallery Affords Immersive Superpowers for Building and Exploring the Human Reference Atlas with Virtual Reality.
Bueckle A; Qing C; Luley S; Kumar Y; Pandey N; Börner K
bioRxiv; 2023 Feb; ():. PubMed ID: 36824790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A Hybrid 2D/3D User Interface for Radiological Diagnosis.
Mandalika VBH; Chernoglazov AI; Billinghurst M; Bartneck C; Hurrell MA; Ruiter N; Butler APH; Butler PH
J Digit Imaging; 2018 Feb; 31(1):56-73. PubMed ID: 28766028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Creating 3D models from Radiologic Images for Virtual Reality Medical Education Modules.
Ammanuel S; Brown I; Uribe J; Rehani B
J Med Syst; 2019 May; 43(6):166. PubMed ID: 31053902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparing a virtual reality head-mounted display to on-screen three-dimensional visualization and two-dimensional computed tomography data for training in decision making in hepatic surgery: a randomized controlled study.
Preukschas AA; Wise PA; Bettscheider L; Pfeiffer M; Wagner M; Huber M; Golriz M; Fischer L; Mehrabi A; Rössler F; Speidel S; Hackert T; Müller-Stich BP; Nickel F; Kenngott HG
Surg Endosc; 2024 May; 38(5):2483-2496. PubMed ID: 38456945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. DICOM 3D viewers, virtual reality or 3D printing - a pilot usability study for assessing the preference of orthopedic surgeons.
Popescu D; Marinescu R; Laptoiu D; Deac GC; Cotet CE
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2021 Sep; 235(9):1014-1024. PubMed ID: 34176364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Desktop VR Is Better Than Non-ambulatory HMD VR for Spatial Learning.
Srivastava P; Rimzhim A; Vijay P; Singh S; Chandra S
Front Robot AI; 2019; 6():50. PubMed ID: 33501066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Design and validation of a 3D virtual reality desktop system for sonographic length and volume measurements in early pregnancy evaluation.
Baken L; van Gruting IM; Steegers EA; van der Spek PJ; Exalto N; Koning AH
J Clin Ultrasound; 2015 Mar; 43(3):164-70. PubMed ID: 25041997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Randomized study comparing 3D virtual reality and conventional 2D on-screen teaching of cerebrovascular anatomy.
Greuter L; De Rosa A; Cattin P; Croci DM; Soleman J; Guzman R
Neurosurg Focus; 2021 Aug; 51(2):E18. PubMed ID: 34333473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Using virtual reality for anatomical landmark annotation in geometric morphometrics.
Messer D; Atchapero M; Jensen MB; Svendsen MS; Galatius A; Olsen MT; Frisvad JR; Dahl VA; Conradsen K; Dahl AB; Bærentzen A
PeerJ; 2022; 10():e12869. PubMed ID: 35186472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Immersive Process Model Exploration in Virtual Reality.
Zenner A; Makhsadov A; Klingner S; Liebemann D; Kruger A
IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2020 May; 26(5):2104-2114. PubMed ID: 32070982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The Hologram in My Hand: How Effective is Interactive Exploration of 3D Visualizations in Immersive Tangible Augmented Reality?
Bach B; Sicat R; Beyer J; Cordeil M; Pfister H
IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2018 Jan; 24(1):457-467. PubMed ID: 28866590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cortical correlate of spatial presence in 2D and 3D interactive virtual reality: an EEG study.
Kober SE; Kurzmann J; Neuper C
Int J Psychophysiol; 2012 Mar; 83(3):365-74. PubMed ID: 22206906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Impact of Avatar Personalization and Immersion on Virtual Body Ownership, Presence, and Emotional Response.
Waltemate T; Gall D; Roth D; Botsch M; Latoschik ME
IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2018 Apr; 24(4):1643-1652. PubMed ID: 29543180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Usability Comparisons of Head-Mounted vs. Stereoscopic Desktop Displays in a Virtual Reality Environment with Pain Patients.
Tong X; Gromala D; Gupta D; Squire P
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2016; 220():424-31. PubMed ID: 27046617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. EarVR: Using Ear Haptics in Virtual Reality for Deaf and Hard-of-Hearing People.
Mirzaei M; Kan P; Kaufmann H
IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2020 May; 26(5):2084-2093. PubMed ID: 32070977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The same video game in 2D, 3D or virtual reality - How does technology impact game evaluation and brand placements?
Roettl J; Terlutter R
PLoS One; 2018; 13(7):e0200724. PubMed ID: 30028839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Digital restoration of fragmentary human skeletal remains: Testing the feasibility of virtual reality.
Jurda M; Urbanová P; Chmelík J
J Forensic Leg Med; 2019 Aug; 66():50-57. PubMed ID: 31220789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
