These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34709193)
1. Improved Environment-Aware-Based Noise Reduction System for Cochlear Implant Users Based on a Knowledge Transfer Approach: Development and Usability Study. Li LP; Han JY; Zheng WZ; Huang RJ; Lai YH J Med Internet Res; 2021 Oct; 23(10):e25460. PubMed ID: 34709193 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Deep Learning-Based Noise Reduction Approach to Improve Speech Intelligibility for Cochlear Implant Recipients. Lai YH; Tsao Y; Lu X; Chen F; Su YT; Chen KC; Chen YH; Chen LC; Po-Hung Li L; Lee CH Ear Hear; 2018; 39(4):795-809. PubMed ID: 29360687 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A Deep Denoising Autoencoder Approach to Improving the Intelligibility of Vocoded Speech in Cochlear Implant Simulation. Lai YH; Chen F; Wang SS; Lu X; Tsao Y; Lee CH IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2017 Jul; 64(7):1568-1578. PubMed ID: 28113304 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A multicentre clinical evaluation of paediatric cochlear implant users upgrading to the Nucleus(®) 6 system. Plasmans A; Rushbrooke E; Moran M; Spence C; Theuwis L; Zarowski A; Offeciers E; Atkinson B; McGovern J; Dornan D; Leigh J; Kaicer A; Hollow R; Martelli L; Looi V; Nel E; Del Dot J; Cowan R; Mauger SJ Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2016 Apr; 83():193-9. PubMed ID: 26968076 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Speech intelligibility and subjective benefit in single-sided deaf adults after cochlear implantation. Finke M; Strauß-Schier A; Kludt E; Büchner A; Illg A Hear Res; 2017 May; 348():112-119. PubMed ID: 28286233 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Benefits of bilateral electrical stimulation with the nucleus cochlear implant in adults: 6-month postoperative results. Laszig R; Aschendorff A; Stecker M; Müller-Deile J; Maune S; Dillier N; Weber B; Hey M; Begall K; Lenarz T; Battmer RD; Böhm M; Steffens T; Strutz J; Linder T; Probst R; Allum J; Westhofen M; Doering W Otol Neurotol; 2004 Nov; 25(6):958-68. PubMed ID: 15547426 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Functional benefits of sequential bilateral cochlear implantation in children with long inter-stage interval between two implants. Kim JS; Kim LS; Jeong SW Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2013 Feb; 77(2):162-9. PubMed ID: 23137855 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Benefit of the UltraZoom beamforming technology in noise in cochlear implant users. Mosnier I; Mathias N; Flament J; Amar D; Liagre-Callies A; Borel S; Ambert-Dahan E; Sterkers O; Bernardeschi D Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Sep; 274(9):3335-3342. PubMed ID: 28664331 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Combining directional microphone and single-channel noise reduction algorithms: a clinical evaluation in difficult listening conditions with cochlear implant users. Hersbach AA; Arora K; Mauger SJ; Dawson PW Ear Hear; 2012; 33(4):e13-23. PubMed ID: 22555182 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Improving the performance of hearing aids in noisy environments based on deep learning technology. Lai YH; Zheng WZ; Tang ST; Fang SH; Liao WH; Tsao Y Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2018 Jul; 2018():404-408. PubMed ID: 30440419 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A physiologically-inspired model reproducing the speech intelligibility benefit in cochlear implant listeners with residual acoustic hearing. Zamaninezhad L; Hohmann V; Büchner A; Schädler MR; Jürgens T Hear Res; 2017 Feb; 344():50-61. PubMed ID: 27838372 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Benefits of Bilateral Hearing on the Telephone for Cochlear Implant Recipients. Miller S; Wolfe J; Duke M; Schafer E; Agrawal S; Koch D; Neumann S J Am Acad Audiol; 2021 Mar; 32(3):180-185. PubMed ID: 33873219 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effect of different cochlear implant microphones on acoustic hearing individuals' binaural benefits for speech perception in noise. Aronoff JM; Freed DJ; Fisher LM; Pal I; Soli SD Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):468-84. PubMed ID: 21412155 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The benefits of remote microphone technology for adults with cochlear implants. Fitzpatrick EM; Séguin C; Schramm DR; Armstrong S; Chénier J Ear Hear; 2009 Oct; 30(5):590-9. PubMed ID: 19561509 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Importance of age and postimplantation experience on speech perception measures in children with sequential bilateral cochlear implants. Peters BR; Litovsky R; Parkinson A; Lake J Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):649-57. PubMed ID: 17712290 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of a transient noise reduction algorithm on speech intelligibility in noise, noise tolerance and perceived annoyance in cochlear implant users. Dingemanse JG; Vroegop JL; Goedegebure A Int J Audiol; 2018 May; 57(5):360-369. PubMed ID: 29334269 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Intelligibility in speech maskers with a binaural cochlear implant sound coding strategy inspired by the contralateral medial olivocochlear reflex. Lopez-Poveda EA; Eustaquio-Martín A; Stohl JS; Wolford RD; Schatzer R; Gorospe JM; Ruiz SSC; Benito F; Wilson BS Hear Res; 2017 May; 348():134-137. PubMed ID: 28188882 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of Additional Low-Pass-Filtered Speech on Listening Effort for Noise-Band-Vocoded Speech in Quiet and in Noise. Pals C; Sarampalis A; van Dijk M; Başkent D Ear Hear; 2019; 40(1):3-17. PubMed ID: 29757801 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of Test Realism on Speech-in-noise Outcomes in Bilateral Cochlear Implant Users. Badajoz-Davila J; Buchholz JM Ear Hear; 2021 Nov-Dec 01; 42(6):1687-1698. PubMed ID: 34010247 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]