These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34709193)

  • 21. Benefit of a commercially available cochlear implant processor with dual-microphone beamforming: a multi-center study.
    Wolfe J; Parkinson A; Schafer EC; Gilden J; Rehwinkel K; Mansanares J; Coughlan E; Wright J; Torres J; Gannaway S
    Otol Neurotol; 2012 Jun; 33(4):553-60. PubMed ID: 22588233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A Deep Denoising Sound Coding Strategy for Cochlear Implants.
    Gajecki T; Zhang Y; Nogueira W
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2023 Sep; 70(9):2700-2709. PubMed ID: 37030808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Application of Noise Reduction Algorithm ClearVoice in Cochlear Implant Processing: Effects on Noise Tolerance and Speech Intelligibility in Noise in Relation to Spectral Resolution.
    Dingemanse JG; Goedegebure A
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(3):357-67. PubMed ID: 25479412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Spatial hearing and speech intelligibility in bilateral cochlear implant users.
    Litovsky RY; Parkinson A; Arcaroli J
    Ear Hear; 2009 Aug; 30(4):419-31. PubMed ID: 19455039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Subjective and objective results after bilateral cochlear implantation in adults.
    Laske RD; Veraguth D; Dillier N; Binkert A; Holzmann D; Huber AM
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Apr; 30(3):313-8. PubMed ID: 19318885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Evaluation of adaptive dynamic range optimization in adverse listening conditions for cochlear implants.
    Ali H; Hazrati O; Tobey EA; Hansen JH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Sep; 136(3):EL242. PubMed ID: 25190428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Avoiding disconnection: An evaluation of telephone options for cochlear implant users.
    Marcrum SC; Picou EM; Steffens T
    Int J Audiol; 2017 Mar; 56(3):186-193. PubMed ID: 27809627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Music perception and speech intelligibility in noise performance by Italian-speaking cochlear implant users.
    Dincer D'Alessandro H; Boyle PJ; Portanova G; Mancini P
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2022 Aug; 279(8):3821-3829. PubMed ID: 34596714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A Binaural Cochlear Implant Sound Coding Strategy Inspired by the Contralateral Medial Olivocochlear Reflex.
    Lopez-Poveda EA; Eustaquio-Martín A; Stohl JS; Wolford RD; Schatzer R; Wilson BS
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(3):e138-48. PubMed ID: 26862711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Assessment of the Speech Intelligibility Performance of Post Lingual Cochlear Implant Users at Different Signal-to-Noise Ratios Using the Turkish Matrix Test.
    Polat Z; Bulut E; Ataş A
    Balkan Med J; 2016 Sep; 33(5):532-538. PubMed ID: 27761281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Evaluation of an Adaptive Dynamic Compensation System in Cochlear Implant Listeners.
    Langner F; Büchner A; Nogueira W
    Trends Hear; 2020; 24():2331216520970349. PubMed ID: 33356927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The Effect of Binaural Beamforming Technology on Speech Intelligibility in Bimodal Cochlear Implant Recipients.
    Vroegop JL; Homans NC; Goedegebure A; Dingemanse JG; van Immerzeel T; van der Schroeff MP
    Audiol Neurootol; 2018; 23(1):32-38. PubMed ID: 29936510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Deep learning restores speech intelligibility in multi-talker interference for cochlear implant users.
    Borjigin A; Kokkinakis K; Bharadwaj HM; Stohl JS
    Sci Rep; 2024 Jun; 14(1):13241. PubMed ID: 38853168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Head orientation benefit to speech intelligibility in noise for cochlear implant users and in realistic listening conditions.
    Grange JA; Culling JF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Dec; 140(6):4061. PubMed ID: 28039996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Contribution of noise reduction pre-processing and microphone directionality strategies in the speech recognition in noise in adult cochlear implant users.
    Goffi-Gomez MVS; Muniz L; Wiemes G; Onuki LC; Calonga L; Osterne FJ; Kós MI; Caldas FF; Cardoso C; Cagnacci B
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2021 Aug; 278(8):2823-2828. PubMed ID: 32948894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Improving word recognition in noise among hearing-impaired subjects with a single-channel cochlear noise-reduction algorithm.
    Fink N; Furst M; Muchnik C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1718-31. PubMed ID: 22978899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Objective and Subjective Measures of Simultaneous vs Sequential Bilateral Cochlear Implants in Adults: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Kraaijenga VJC; Ramakers GGJ; Smulders YE; van Zon A; Stegeman I; Smit AL; Stokroos RJ; Hendrice N; Free RH; Maat B; Frijns JHM; Briaire JJ; Mylanus EAM; Huinck WJ; Van Zanten GA; Grolman W
    JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2017 Sep; 143(9):881-890. PubMed ID: 28655036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Adjustments of the amplitude mapping function: Sensitivity of cochlear implant users and effects on subjective preference and speech recognition.
    Theelen-van den Hoek FL; Boymans M; van Dijk B; Dreschler WA
    Int J Audiol; 2016 Nov; 55(11):674-87. PubMed ID: 27447758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effect of adaptive beamforming and noise reduction algorithms on speech intelligibility and noise tolerance in bimodal cochlear implant users.
    Michels A; Oukheira Y; Brendel M; Aschendorff A; Arndt S; Wesarg T
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2022 May; 23(3):148-157. PubMed ID: 35193474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effect of Noise Reduction Gain Errors on Simulated Cochlear Implant Speech Intelligibility.
    Kressner AA; May T; Dau T
    Trends Hear; 2019; 23():2331216519825930. PubMed ID: 30755108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.