167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34709667)
1. Experimental comparison of photon versus particle computed tomography to predict tissue relative stopping powers.
Bär E; Volz L; Collins-Fekete CA; Brons S; Runz A; Schulte RW; Seco J
Med Phys; 2022 Jan; 49(1):474-487. PubMed ID: 34709667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The accuracy of helium ion CT based particle therapy range prediction: an experimental study comparing different particle and x-ray CT modalities.
Volz L; Collins-Fekete CA; Bär E; Brons S; Graeff C; Johnson RP; Runz A; Sarosiek C; Schulte RW; Seco J
Phys Med Biol; 2021 Nov; 66(23):. PubMed ID: 34706355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Helium CT: Monte Carlo simulation results for an ideal source and detector with comparison to proton CT.
Piersimoni P; Faddegon BA; Méndez JR; Schulte RW; Volz L; Seco J
Med Phys; 2018 Jul; 45(7):3264-3274. PubMed ID: 29727481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of the impact of a scanner prototype on proton CT and helium CT image quality and dose efficiency with Monte Carlo simulation.
Götz S; Dickmann J; Rit S; Krah N; Khellaf F; Schulte RW; Parodi K; Dedes G; Landry G
Phys Med Biol; 2022 Feb; 67(5):. PubMed ID: 35086073
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Experimental comparison of proton CT and dual energy x-ray CT for relative stopping power estimation in proton therapy.
Dedes G; Dickmann J; Niepel K; Wesp P; Johnson RP; Pankuch M; Bashkirov V; Rit S; Volz L; Schulte RW; Landry G; Parodi K
Phys Med Biol; 2019 Aug; 64(16):165002. PubMed ID: 31220814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Impact of beam-hardening corrections on proton relative stopping power estimates from single- and dual-energy CT.
Chacko MS; Wu D; Grewal HS; Sonnad JR
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2022 Sep; 23(9):e13711. PubMed ID: 35816460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accuracy of proton stopping power estimation of silicone breast implants with single and dual-energy CT calibration techniques.
Chacko MS; Grewal HS; Wu D; Sonnad JR
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2021 Sep; 22(9):159-170. PubMed ID: 34275175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dosimetric comparison of stopping power calibration with dual-energy CT and single-energy CT in proton therapy treatment planning.
Zhu J; Penfold SN
Med Phys; 2016 Jun; 43(6):2845-2854. PubMed ID: 27277033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effect of beam purity and scanner complexity on proton CT accuracy.
Piersimoni P; Ramos-Méndez J; Geoghegan T; Bashkirov VA; Schulte RW; Faddegon BA
Med Phys; 2017 Jan; 44(1):284-298. PubMed ID: 28066887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessment of the impact of CT calibration procedures for proton therapy planning on pediatric treatments.
Bär E; Collins-Fekete CA; Rompokos V; Zhang Y; Gaze MN; Warry A; Poynter A; Royle G
Med Phys; 2021 Sep; 48(9):5202-5218. PubMed ID: 34174092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Experimental comparison of relative stopping power evaluation between proton CT and x-ray CT for pre-clinical proton irradiation studies of small animals.
Terakawa A; Hosokawa H; Nogami M; Hitomi K; Ishii K
Phys Med Biol; 2023 Apr; 68(9):. PubMed ID: 37011626
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Technical Note: Relative proton stopping power estimation from virtual monoenergetic images reconstructed from dual-layer computed tomography.
Landry G; Dörringer F; Si-Mohamed S; Douek P; Abascal JFPJ; Peyrin F; Almeida IP; Verhaegen F; Rinaldi I; Parodi K; Rit S
Med Phys; 2019 Apr; 46(4):1821-1828. PubMed ID: 30695108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Towards subpercentage uncertainty proton stopping-power mapping via dual-energy CT: Direct experimental validation and uncertainty analysis of a statistical iterative image reconstruction method.
Medrano M; Liu R; Zhao T; Webb T; Politte DG; Whiting BR; Liao R; Ge T; Porras-Chaverri MA; O'Sullivan JA; Williamson JF
Med Phys; 2022 Mar; 49(3):1599-1618. PubMed ID: 35029302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The potential of dual-energy CT to reduce proton beam range uncertainties.
Bär E; Lalonde A; Royle G; Lu HM; Bouchard H
Med Phys; 2017 Jun; 44(6):2332-2344. PubMed ID: 28295434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Single energy CT-based mass density and relative stopping power estimation for proton therapy using deep learning method.
Gao Y; Chang CW; Roper J; Axente M; Lei Y; Pan S; Bradley JD; Zhou J; Liu T; Yang X
Front Oncol; 2023; 13():1278180. PubMed ID: 38074686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of proton therapy treatment planning for head tumors with a pencil beam algorithm on dual and single energy CT images.
Hudobivnik N; Schwarz F; Johnson T; Agolli L; Dedes G; Tessonnier T; Verhaegen F; Thieke C; Belka C; Sommer WH; Parodi K; Landry G
Med Phys; 2016 Jan; 43(1):495. PubMed ID: 26745942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparative accuracy and resolution assessment of two prototype proton computed tomography scanners.
Dedes G; Drosten H; Götz S; Dickmann J; Sarosiek C; Pankuch M; Krah N; Rit S; Bashkirov V; Schulte RW; Johnson RP; Parodi K; DeJongh E; Landry G
Med Phys; 2022 Jul; 49(7):4671-4681. PubMed ID: 35396739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dosimetric Comparison between Single-energy Computed Tomography and Dual-energy Computed Tomography Relative to Stopping Power Estimation in Proton Therapy.
Chirdchid T; Ruangchan S; Sanghangthum T
J Med Phys; 2023; 48(3):292-297. PubMed ID: 37969143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparison of relative proton stopping power measurements across patient size using dual- and single-energy CT.
Michalak G; Taasti V; Krauss B; Deisher A; Halaweish A; McCollough C
Acta Oncol; 2017 Nov; 56(11):1465-1471. PubMed ID: 28885130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Stopping power accuracy and achievable spatial resolution of helium ion imaging using a prototype particle CT detector system.
Volz L; Collins-Fekete CA; Piersimoni P; Johnson RP; Bashkirov V; Schulte R; Seco J
Curr Dir Biomed Eng; 2017 Sep; 3(2):401-404. PubMed ID: 36258816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
