These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34710131)

  • 1. Are women always better able to recognize faces? The unveiling role of exposure time.
    Hansen T; Zaichkowsky J; de Jong A
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(10):e0257741. PubMed ID: 34710131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Gender-based prototype formation in face recognition.
    Baudouin JY; Brochard R
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Jul; 37(4):888-98. PubMed ID: 21480752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Gender and hometown population density interact to predict face recognition ability.
    Sunday MA; Patel PA; Dodd MD; Gauthier I
    Vision Res; 2019 Oct; 163():14-23. PubMed ID: 31472340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Critical features for face recognition.
    Abudarham N; Shkiller L; Yovel G
    Cognition; 2019 Jan; 182():73-83. PubMed ID: 30218914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. I spy with my little eye: typical, daily exposure to faces documented from a first-person infant perspective.
    Sugden NA; Mohamed-Ali MI; Moulson MC
    Dev Psychobiol; 2014 Feb; 56(2):249-61. PubMed ID: 24285109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Hometown size affects the processing of naturalistic face variability.
    Balas B; Saville A
    Vision Res; 2017 Dec; 141():228-236. PubMed ID: 28025050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The role of experience-based perceptual learning in the face inversion effect.
    Civile C; Obhi SS; McLaren IPL
    Vision Res; 2019 Apr; 157():84-88. PubMed ID: 29608937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Face gender modulates women's brain activity during face encoding.
    Lovén J; Svärd J; Ebner NC; Herlitz A; Fischer H
    Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2014 Jul; 9(7):1000-5. PubMed ID: 23698075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Gender differences in brain activation during encoding and recognition of male and female faces.
    Ino T; Nakai R; Azuma T; Kimura T; Fukuyama H
    Brain Imaging Behav; 2010 Mar; 4(1):55-67. PubMed ID: 20503114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Face-n-Food: Gender Differences in Tuning to Faces.
    Pavlova MA; Scheffler K; Sokolov AN
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0130363. PubMed ID: 26154177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sex differences in face gender recognition in humans.
    Cellerino A; Borghetti D; Sartucci F
    Brain Res Bull; 2004 Jul; 63(6):443-9. PubMed ID: 15249109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The role of the upper and lower face in the recognition of facial identity in dynamic stimuli.
    Yeung SC; Sidhu J; Youn S; Schaefer HRH; Barton JJS; Corrow SL
    Vision Res; 2023 May; 206():108194. PubMed ID: 36801665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Part and whole face representations in immediate and long-term memory.
    Tanaka JW; Heptonstall B; Campbell A
    Vision Res; 2019 Nov; 164():53-61. PubMed ID: 31585389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Symmetrical Viewpoint Representations in Face-Selective Regions Convey an Advantage in the Perception and Recognition of Faces.
    Flack TR; Harris RJ; Young AW; Andrews TJ
    J Neurosci; 2019 May; 39(19):3741-3751. PubMed ID: 30842248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Probing the face-space of individuals with prosopagnosia.
    Nishimura M; Doyle J; Humphreys K; Behrmann M
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 May; 48(6):1828-41. PubMed ID: 20227431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Greater visual averaging of face identity for own-gender faces.
    de Fockert JW; Gautrey B
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2013 Jun; 20(3):468-73. PubMed ID: 23355045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Same critical features are used for identification of familiarized and unfamiliar faces.
    Abudarham N; Yovel G
    Vision Res; 2019 Apr; 157():105-111. PubMed ID: 29360472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sex differences in face gender recognition: an event-related potential study.
    Sun Y; Gao X; Han S
    Brain Res; 2010 Apr; 1327():69-76. PubMed ID: 20153301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Infants' experience-dependent processing of male and female faces: insights from eye tracking and event-related potentials.
    Righi G; Westerlund A; Congdon EL; Troller-Renfree S; Nelson CA
    Dev Cogn Neurosci; 2014 Apr; 8():144-52. PubMed ID: 24200421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sex differences in social cognition: The case of face processing.
    Proverbio AM
    J Neurosci Res; 2017 Jan; 95(1-2):222-234. PubMed ID: 27870403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.