100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34711003)
1. Evaluation of PathTezt™, a Liquid-Based Cytology System.
Mohd Nafis NS; Mat Zin AA
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2021 Oct; 22(10):3261-3266. PubMed ID: 34711003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cell preparation methods and criteria for sample adequacy. International Academy of Cytology Task Force summary. Diagnostic Cytology Towards the 21st Century: An International Expert Conference and Tutorial.
McGoogan E; Colgan TJ; Ramzy I; Cochand-Priollet B; Davey DD; Grohs HK; Gurley AM; Husain OA; Hutchinson ML; Knesel EA; Linder J; Mango LJ; Mitchell H; Peebles A; Reith A; Robinowitz M; Sauer T; Shida S; Solomon D; Topalidis T; Wilbur DC; Yamauchi K
Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 9479321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cervical Cancer Detection between Conventional and Liquid Based Cervical Cytology: a 6-Year Experience in Northern Bangkok Thailand.
Phaliwong P; Pariyawateekul P; Khuakoonratt N; Sirichai W; Bhamarapravatana K; Suwannarurk K
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2018 May; 19(5):1331-1336. PubMed ID: 29802695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Short interval between two Pap smears: effect on the result of the second smear? A prospective randomized trial.
Kolben TM; Bergauer F; Moeckel J; Boettcher B; Thaler CJ; Kolben T; Crispin A; Dannecker C; Mahner S; Gallwas J
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2017 Jun; 295(6):1427-1433. PubMed ID: 28405743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Health technology assessment report: Computer-assisted Pap test for cervical cancer screening].
Della Palma P; Moresco L; Giorgi Rossi P
Epidemiol Prev; 2012; 36(5 Suppl 3):e1-43. PubMed ID: 23139174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A new, liquid-based cytology technique.
Weynand B; Berlière M; Haumont E; Massart F; Pourvoyeur A; Bernard P; Donnez J; Galant C
Acta Cytol; 2003; 47(2):149-53. PubMed ID: 12685180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of gel lubricant on cervical cytology.
Charoenkwan K; Ninunanahaeminda K; Khunamornpong S; Srisomboon J; Thorner PS
Acta Cytol; 2008; 52(6):654-8. PubMed ID: 19068667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Liquid-based cervical-cell collection with brushes and wooden spatulas: a comparison of 100 conventional smears from high-risk women to liquid-fixed cytocentrifuge slides, demonstrating a cost-effective, alternative monolayer slide preparation method.
Johnson T; Maksem JA; Belsheim BL; Roose EB; Klock LA; Eatwell L
Diagn Cytopathol; 2000 Feb; 22(2):86-91. PubMed ID: 10649517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Risk factors of cervical cancer after a negative cytological diagnosis in Polish cervical cancer screening programme.
Macios A; Didkowska J; Wojciechowska U; Komerska K; Glińska P; Kamiński MF; Nowakowski A
Cancer Med; 2021 May; 10(10):3449-3460. PubMed ID: 33934537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Tall-columnar glandular cells in SurePath™ liquid-based cytology Pap sample: Learning from mimics/pitfalls.
Gupta N; Jain V; Srinivasan R; Singh T
Cytopathology; 2024 Jul; 35(4):510-514. PubMed ID: 38712698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cytomorphologic Features of Gastric-Type Endocervical Adenocarcinoma in Liquid-Based Preparations.
Schwock J; Starova B; Khan ZF; Mirkovic J; Parra-Herran C; Ko HM; Rouzbahman M; Ghorab Z
Acta Cytol; 2021; 65(1):56-66. PubMed ID: 33152741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Technical external quality assessment for SurePath stained liquid-based cytology gynaecological cervical samples using control material--a novel approach.
Boucher NA; Rose BG
Cytopathology; 2009 Jun; 20(3):169-75. PubMed ID: 18637809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical results of a split sample liquid-based cytology (ThinPrep) study of 4,322 patients in a Turkish institution.
Tuncer ZS; Başaran M; Sezgin Y; Firat P; Mocan Kuzey G
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2005; 26(6):646-8. PubMed ID: 16398228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of conventional Pap smear and liquid-based cytology: A study of cervical cancer screening at a tertiary care center in Bihar.
Pankaj S; Nazneen S; Kumari S; Kumari A; Kumari A; Kumari J; Choudhary V; Kumar S
Indian J Cancer; 2018; 55(1):80-83. PubMed ID: 30147099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Efficacy of modified rapid economic acetic acid-based Papanicolaou stain.
Bhagat P; Susheilia S; Singh K; Sadhukhan S; Rajwanshi A; Dey P
Cytopathology; 2016 Dec; 27(6):452-455. PubMed ID: 27019215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Implementation of pre-captured videos for remote diagnosis of cervical cytology specimens.
Archondakis S; Roma M; Kaladelfou E
Cytopathology; 2021 May; 32(3):338-343. PubMed ID: 33368677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A Groundbreaking Work Which Laid the Foundation for Mass Screening in Cervical Cytology in Japan.
Osamura RY
Acta Cytol; 2017; 61(4-5):299-304. PubMed ID: 28693014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Metastatic breast cancer diagnosed on cervical cytology.
Yuan L; Oshilaja O; Sierk A; Zhang G; Booth CN; Brainard J; Dyhdalo KS
Cytopathology; 2021 Jan; 32(1):127-131. PubMed ID: 32789952
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Detection of human papillomavirus DNA in routine cervical scraping samples: use for a national cervical cancer screening program in a developing nation.
Othman N; Othman NH
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2014; 15(5):2245-9. PubMed ID: 24716964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Conventional Pap smear and liquid-based cytology as screening tools in low-resource settings in Latin America: experience of the Latin American screening study.
Longatto-Filho A; Maeda MY; Erzen M; Branca M; Roteli-Martins C; Naud P; Derchain SF; Hammes L; Matos J; Gontijo R; Sarian LO; Lima TP; Tatti S; Syrjänen S; Syrjänen K
Acta Cytol; 2005; 49(5):500-6. PubMed ID: 16334026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
