BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34712090)

  • 1. Procedural fairness in mental health review tribunals: the views of patient advocates.
    Boyle S; Walsh T
    Psychiatr Psychol Law; 2021; 28(2):163-184. PubMed ID: 34712090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A Study into the Operation of the Queensland Mental Health Review Tribunal.
    Boyle S; Walsh T; Nelson L
    Med Law Rev; 2021 Aug; 29(1):106-127. PubMed ID: 33724376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Professional Values and Mental Health Tribunals: How Healthcare Professionals' and Lawyers' Views Are Shaped by Values, and How This Might Impede Reform.
    Jager F; Boyle S; Peron A
    Issues Ment Health Nurs; 2024 May; ():1-11. PubMed ID: 38810228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Service users' experiences of mental health tribunals in Ireland: a qualitative analysis.
    Murphy R; McGuinness D; Bainbridge E; Brosnan L; Keys M; Felzmann H; Murphy K; Hallahan B; Higgins A; McDonald C
    Ir J Psychol Med; 2017 Dec; 34(4):233-242. PubMed ID: 30115180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Meaningful participation or tokenism for individuals on community based compulsory treatment orders? Views and experiences of the mental health tribunal in Scotland.
    Macgregor A
    J Ment Health; 2022 Apr; 31(2):158-165. PubMed ID: 32955380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Australian mental health tribunals--'Space' for rights, protection, treatment and governance?
    Carney T
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2012; 35(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 22142893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Serious misconduct of health professionals in disciplinary tribunals under the National Law 2010-17.
    Millbank J
    Aust Health Rev; 2020 Apr; 44(2):190-199. PubMed ID: 31671287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The legal oversight of community treatment orders: A qualitative analysis of tribunal decision-making.
    Jobling H
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2019; 62():95-103. PubMed ID: 30616860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Perceptions of key stakeholders on procedural justice in the Consent And Capacity Board of Ontario's hearings.
    Paul S; Nakhost A; Stergiopoulos V; Matheson FI; Simpson AIF; Guimond T
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2020; 68():101515. PubMed ID: 32033692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Are mental health tribunals operating in accordance with international human rights standards? A systematic review of the international literature.
    Macgregor A; Brown M; Stavert J
    Health Soc Care Community; 2019 Jul; 27(4):e494-e513. PubMed ID: 30993806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An audit of nursing reports for First-Tier Tribunals in a secure inpatient service.
    Haw C
    J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs; 2015 Aug; 22(6):407-12. PubMed ID: 26010259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mental health review tribunals. A follow-up of reviewed patients.
    Myers DH
    Br J Psychiatry; 1997 Mar; 170():253-6. PubMed ID: 9229032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A one year analysis of appeals made to mental health review tribunals in New Zealand.
    O'Brien TA; Mellsop GW; McDonald KP; Ruthe CB
    Aust N Z J Psychiatry; 1995 Dec; 29(4):661-5. PubMed ID: 8825830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Widening the circle: making Mental Health Review Tribunal hearings accessible in Indigenous, rural and remote settings.
    Fisher S; Kilcullen D; Schrieber G; Hughes B
    Australas Psychiatry; 2009 Aug; 17 Suppl 1():S83-7. PubMed ID: 19579115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Doctors on tribunals. A confusion of roles.
    Richardson G; Machin D
    Br J Psychiatry; 2000 Feb; 176():110-5. PubMed ID: 10755045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Toward understanding why fairness matters: the influence of mortality salience on reactions to procedural fairness.
    van den Bos K; Miedema J
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2000 Sep; 79(3):355-66. PubMed ID: 10981839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The capacity to refuse psychiatric treatment: a guide to the law for clinicians and tribunal members.
    Ryan C; Callaghan S; Peisah C
    Aust N Z J Psychiatry; 2015 Apr; 49(4):324-33. PubMed ID: 25690742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The operation of the Mental Health Act, 1983 (NSW).
    Errington MR
    Aust N Z J Psychiatry; 1986 Sep; 20(3):278-92. PubMed ID: 3467708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Judicial virtues and decision-making in the VCAT Guardianship List.
    Polkinghorn R
    J Law Med; 2014 Jun; 21(4):984-1003. PubMed ID: 25087374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An audit of the quality of reports to Mental Health Review Tribunals.
    O'Muirithe B; Shankar R
    Med Sci Law; 2008 Jul; 48(3):221-4. PubMed ID: 18754208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.