These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34712090)

  • 21. The role of societal benefits and fairness concerns among decision makers and decision recipients.
    Heuer L; Penrod S; Kattan A
    Law Hum Behav; 2007 Dec; 31(6):573-610. PubMed ID: 17245632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Patient competence and professional incompetence: disagreements in capacity assessments in one Australian jurisdiction, and their educational implications.
    Parker M
    J Law Med; 2008 Aug; 16(1):25-35. PubMed ID: 18807792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The Illegal Migrants (Determination by Tribunals) Amendment Act, 1988 (No. 24 of 1988), 25 April 1988.
    India
    Annu Rev Popul Law; 1988; 15():183-4. PubMed ID: 12289338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Investigating Investigation Powers under the Health Practitioner Regulation National Law.
    Corns C
    J Law Med; 2023 Dec; 30(3):673-689. PubMed ID: 38332601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Children and the Law: The Place of Health Professionals
    Kaplan C
    Child Adolesc Ment Health; 2002 Nov; 7(4):181-188. PubMed ID: 33158323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Predictors of Mental Health Review Tribunal (MHRT) outcome in a forensic inpatient population: a prospective cohort study.
    Jewell A; Dean K; Fahy T; Cullen AE
    BMC Psychiatry; 2017 Jan; 17(1):25. PubMed ID: 28095806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Electroconvulsive therapy, law and human rights
    Freckelton I
    Psychiatr Psychol Law; 2019; 26(1):1-20. PubMed ID: 31984061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Procedural justice and status: status salience as antecedent of procedural fairness effects.
    van Prooijen JW; van den Bos K; Wilke HA
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2002 Dec; 83(6):1353-61. PubMed ID: 12500817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The Massachusetts malpractice plaintiff's new hurdles: the expanding role of the medical malpractice screening tribunal.
    Ossyra JD
    Am J Law Med; 1983; 8(4):481-508. PubMed ID: 6859051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Fifteen Years On: What Patterns Continue to Emerge from New Zealand's Health Practitioners Disciplinary Tribunal?
    Surgenor LJ; Diesfeld K; Kersey K; Kelly O; Rychert M
    J Law Med; 2020 Dec; 28(1):165-178. PubMed ID: 33415898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. R v. Canons Park Mental Health Review Tribunal, ex parte A.
    Great Britain. England. High Court of Justice, Queen's Bench Division
    All Engl Law Rep; 1993 Jul; [1994] 1():481-94. PubMed ID: 11648636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Which involuntary admissions are revoked by mental health tribunals? A report from the Dublin Involuntary Admission Study (DIAS).
    Kelly BD; Duffy RM; Curley A
    Psychiatry Res; 2018 Apr; 262():583-585. PubMed ID: 28951143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Procedural fairness, outcome favorability, and judgments of an authority's responsibility.
    Brockner J; Fishman AY; Reb J; Goldman B; Spiegel S; Garden C
    J Appl Psychol; 2007 Nov; 92(6):1657-71. PubMed ID: 18020803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The role of the Mental Health Tribunal in setting duration of compulsory treatment in Victoria.
    Taylor-Sands M; Nicholson Z
    Psychiatr Psychol Law; 2021; 28(3):343-362. PubMed ID: 35530126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Procedural fairness predicts cooperative behaviour for high-self-esteem individuals but not for low-self-esteem individuals.
    Sun Q; Xiong Y; Guo S; Wang X; Liu Y
    Int J Psychol; 2021 Apr; 56(2):266-275. PubMed ID: 32876335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Uncertainty management: the influence of uncertainty salience on reactions to perceived procedural fairness.
    van den Bos K
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2001 Jun; 80(6):931-41. PubMed ID: 11414375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Procedural fairness in medical investigations and disciplinary proceedings.
    Bowen T; Saxton A
    J Law Med; 2008 Dec; 16(3):512-22. PubMed ID: 19205311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The effects of trust in authority and procedural fairness on cooperation.
    De Cremer D; Tyler TR
    J Appl Psychol; 2007 May; 92(3):639-49. PubMed ID: 17484547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A suitable case for treatment: should a tribunal discharge a patient if no effective treatment is available?
    Gibbons J
    New Law J; 1994 Apr; 144(6645):567-568, 573. PubMed ID: 11659955
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Psychosocial care provision for terminally ill clients in rural Australian communities: the role of social work.
    Johns LL; McAuliffe D; Dorsett P
    Rural Remote Health; 2019 Sep; 19(3):5285. PubMed ID: 31533435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.