These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Cephalometric changes from activator-headgear treatment of Class II, division 1 malocclusion. Kigele E J Clin Orthod; 1987 Jul; 21(7):466-9. PubMed ID: 3476494 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [A cephalometric comparison of orthopedic (Activator) headgear and orthodontic (Edgewise) treatments in Class II, 1 malocclusions]. Altuğ Z Ankara Univ Hekim Fak Derg; 1988 May; 15(2):149-56. PubMed ID: 3271149 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of activator treatment on Class II, division 1 malocclusion. Chang HF; Wu KM; Chen KC; Cheng MC J Clin Orthod; 1989 Aug; 23(8):560-3. PubMed ID: 2639151 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Class II, division 1 treatment with Fränkel and Edgewise appliances--a comparative study of mandibular growth and facial esthetics. Adenwalla ST; Kronman JH Angle Orthod; 1985 Oct; 55(4):281-98. PubMed ID: 3865566 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Functional orthopedic treatment: the Frankel appliance in Class II div. 1]. De Cecco G; Pietrobattista A Dent Cadmos; 1986 Dec; 54(19):89-93. PubMed ID: 3472938 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Skeletal and soft tissue response to activator treatment. Forsberg CM; Odenrick L Eur J Orthod; 1981; 3(4):247-53. PubMed ID: 6945995 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [Is orthodontic correction in late cases of Angle class II(2) possible with functional orthodontic appliances?]. Stefani E; Topoll H Fortschr Kieferorthop; 1987 Jun; 48(3):154-60. PubMed ID: 3475236 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Correction of Class II, Division 2 malocclusions through the use of the Bionator appliance. Report of two cases. Rutter RR; Witt E Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1990 Feb; 97(2):106-12. PubMed ID: 2301297 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Removable appliances for Class II]. Chateau M; Le Gall Y Rev Orthop Dento Faciale; 1975 Apr; 9(2):129-42. PubMed ID: 1078103 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Five-year treatment results with a headgear-activator combination. Lehman R; Romuli A; Bakker V Eur J Orthod; 1988 Nov; 10(4):309-18. PubMed ID: 3061833 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical application of the Fränkel appliance. Case reports. Owen AH Angle Orthod; 1983 Jan; 53(1):29-88. PubMed ID: 6573864 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [Treatment of Class II malocclusion using the Herbst appliance]. Schiavoni R Mondo Ortod; 1990; 15(1):11-23. PubMed ID: 2402252 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Changes in the soft tissue after functional orthodontic treatment determined by cephalometry--statistical study of Angle Class II division 2 malocclusion]. Stefani E Fortschr Kieferorthop; 1984 Feb; 45(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 6590439 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The MARS appliance. Report of a case. Clements RM; Jacobson A Am J Orthod; 1982 Dec; 82(6):445-55. PubMed ID: 6961815 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Skeletal changes during the treatment of Class II/I malocclusions. Cohen AM Br J Orthod; 1983 Jul; 10(3):147-53. PubMed ID: 6575823 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Treatment of a basal and dental Class II malocclusion in mixed dentition, with functional appliances and extraoral traction]. Viora E; Mossino ML; Ramirez Velarde JC; Guglielmino D Minerva Ortognatod; 1989; 7(3-4):117-32. PubMed ID: 2640572 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]