These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34713410)

  • 1. All together now: Simultaneous feature integration and feature retrieval in action control.
    Moeller B; Frings C
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2022 Apr; 29(2):512-520. PubMed ID: 34713410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Predictability reduces event file retrieval.
    Schmalbrock P; Hommel B; Münchau A; Beste C; Frings C
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2023 May; 85(4):1073-1087. PubMed ID: 36577916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dissecting stimulus-response binding effects: Grouping by color separately impacts integration and retrieval processes.
    Laub R; Frings C; Moeller B
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Aug; 80(6):1474-1488. PubMed ID: 29687358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Attentional control of the creation and retrieval of stimulus-response bindings.
    Hommel B; Memelink J; Zmigrod S; Colzato LS
    Psychol Res; 2014 Jul; 78(4):520-38. PubMed ID: 23884516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Memory Meets Control in Hippocampal and Striatal Binding of Stimuli, Responses, and Attentional Control States.
    Jiang J; Brashier NM; Egner T
    J Neurosci; 2015 Nov; 35(44):14885-95. PubMed ID: 26538657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. From simple to complex actions: Response-response bindings as a new approach to action sequences.
    Moeller B; Frings C
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2019 Jan; 148(1):174-183. PubMed ID: 30211579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A mighty tool not only in perception: Figure-ground mechanisms control binding and retrieval alike.
    Schmalbrock P; Frings C
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2022 Oct; 84(7):2255-2270. PubMed ID: 35610411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Separating binding and retrieval of event files in older adults.
    Münster ND; Schmalbrock P; Bäumer T; Hommel B; Beste C; Münchau A; Frings C
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2024 Apr; 244():104190. PubMed ID: 38368782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Lost time: Bindings do not represent temporal order information.
    Moeller B; Frings C
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Feb; 26(1):325-331. PubMed ID: 29869024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Detection versus discrimination: The limits of binding accounts in action control.
    Schöpper LM; Hilchey MD; Lappe M; Frings C
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 May; 82(4):2085-2097. PubMed ID: 31823230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Binding and retrieval of temporal action features: Probing the precision level of feature representations in action planning.
    Bogon J; Köllnberger K; Thomaschke R; Pfister R
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2023 Jul; 49(7):989-998. PubMed ID: 37261745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cling together, swing together? Assessing indirect retrieval of stimulus-response bindings for associated stimuli.
    Arunkumar M; Rothermund K; Kunde W; Mocke V; Giesen CG
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38874797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Does feature-based attention play a role in the episodic retrieval of event files?
    Huffman G; Hilchey MD; Weidler BJ; Mills M; Pratt J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2020 Mar; 46(3):241-251. PubMed ID: 32077740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The level of representation of irrelevant stimuli-Distractor-response binding within and between the senses.
    Laub R; Merz S; Dröschel H; Frings C
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 Jul; 83(5):2256-2266. PubMed ID: 33768482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. It's not distance but similarity of distance: changing stimulus relations affect the control of action sequences.
    Selimi S; Frings C; Münchau A; Beste C; Moeller B
    Psychol Res; 2024 May; ():. PubMed ID: 38733538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. David and Goliath-size does matter: size modulates feature-response binding of irrelevant features.
    Singh T; Frings C
    Psychol Res; 2020 Oct; 84(7):2034-2045. PubMed ID: 31020395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Flexible goal imitation: Vicarious feedback influences stimulus-response binding by observation.
    Giesen C; Scherdin K; Rothermund K
    Learn Behav; 2017 Jun; 45(2):147-156. PubMed ID: 27800568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. May I have your attention please: Binding of attended but response-irrelevant features.
    Singh T; Moeller B; Koch I; Frings C
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Jul; 80(5):1143-1156. PubMed ID: 29520713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. On the Role of Memory Representations in Action Control: Neurophysiological Decoding Reveals the Reactivation of Integrated Stimulus-Response Feature Representations.
    Eggert E; Takacs A; Münchau A; Beste C
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2022 Jun; 34(7):1246-1258. PubMed ID: 35552449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. What is behind partial repetition costs? Event-files do not fully occupy bound feature codes.
    Mocke V; Benini E; Parmar J; Schiltenwolf M; Kunde W
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2023 Aug; 30(4):1463-1474. PubMed ID: 36867367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.