These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34713671)

  • 41. Bilateral implantation of low-profile interbody fusion cages: subsidence, lordosis, and fusion analysis.
    Schiffman M; Brau SA; Henderson R; Gimmestad G
    Spine J; 2003; 3(5):377-87. PubMed ID: 14588950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Analysis of stress distribution in lumbar interbody fusion.
    Kumar N; Judith MR; Kumar A; Mishra V; Robert MC
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Aug; 30(15):1731-5. PubMed ID: 16094274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Early Outcomes of Three-Dimensional-Printed Porous Titanium versus Polyetheretherketone Cage Implantation for Stand-Alone Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion in the Treatment of Symptomatic Adjacent Segment Degeneration.
    Adl Amini D; Moser M; Oezel L; Zhu J; Okano I; Shue J; Sama AA; Cammisa FP; Girardi FP; Hughes AP
    World Neurosurg; 2022 Jun; 162():e14-e20. PubMed ID: 34863938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Advantages and Disadvantages of the Use of Various Types of Interbody Implants in Cervical Spine Surgery. Critical Review of the Literature.
    Godlewski B; Dominiak M
    Ortop Traumatol Rehabil; 2020 Aug; 22(4):213-220. PubMed ID: 32986004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Facet Joint Fixation and Anterior, Direct Lateral, and Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusions for Treatment of Degenerative Lumbar Disc Diseases: Retrospective Cohort Study of a New Minimally Invasive Technique.
    Belykh E; Kalinin AA; Martirosyan NL; Kerimbayev T; Theodore N; Preul MC; Byvaltsev VA
    World Neurosurg; 2018 Jun; 114():e959-e968. PubMed ID: 29588241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. [Instability of lower lumbar treated with posterior lumbar interbody fusion with autologous iliac crest or interbody fusion cage: a comparative study].
    Wang R; Lin X; Shi S; Xiu Z; Guo Y
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2008 Aug; 22(8):928-32. PubMed ID: 18773807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Interbody fusion cage design using integrated global layout and local microstructure topology optimization.
    Lin CY; Hsiao CC; Chen PQ; Hollister SJ
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Aug; 29(16):1747-54. PubMed ID: 15303018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. An update of interbody cages for spine fusion surgeries: from shape design to materials.
    Li G; Yang L; Wu G; Qian Z; Li H
    Expert Rev Med Devices; 2022 Dec; 19(12):977-989. PubMed ID: 36617696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Additive-manufactured Ti-6Al-4 V/Polyetheretherketone composite porous cage for Interbody fusion: bone growth and biocompatibility evaluation in a porcine model.
    Tsai PI; Wu MH; Li YY; Lin TH; Tsai JSC; Huang HI; Lai HJ; Lee MH; Chen CY
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2021 Feb; 22(1):171. PubMed ID: 33573634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Choice of Spinal Interbody Fusion Cage Material and Design Influences Subsidence and Osseointegration Performance.
    Fogel G; Martin N; Williams GM; Unger J; Yee-Yanagishita C; Pelletier M; Walsh W; Peng Y; Jekir M
    World Neurosurg; 2022 Jun; 162():e626-e634. PubMed ID: 35346883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Comparison of 3D-printed titanium-alloy, standard titanium-alloy, and PEEK interbody spacers in an ovine model.
    Van Horn MR; Beard R; Wang W; Cunningham BW; Mullinix KP; Allall M; Bucklen BS
    Spine J; 2021 Dec; 21(12):2097-2103. PubMed ID: 34029756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. 3D-printed titanium cages without bone graft outperform PEEK cages with autograft in an animal model.
    Laratta JL; Vivace BJ; López-Peña M; Guzón FM; Gonzalez-Cantalpeidra A; Jorge-Mora A; Villar-Liste RM; Pino-Lopez L; Lukyanchuk A; Taghizadeh EA; Pino-Minguez J
    Spine J; 2022 Jun; 22(6):1016-1027. PubMed ID: 34906741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Computational comparison of three different cage porosities in posterior lumbar interbody fusion with porous cage.
    Chen YN; Chang CW
    Comput Biol Med; 2021 Dec; 139():105036. PubMed ID: 34798396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Biodegradable interbody cages for lumbar spine fusion: Current concepts and future directions.
    Laubach M; Kobbe P; Hutmacher DW
    Biomaterials; 2022 Sep; 288():121699. PubMed ID: 35995620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Evaluation of bioabsorbable multiamino acid copolymer/α-tri-calcium phosphate interbody fusion cages in a goat model.
    Chunguang Z; Yueming S; Chongqi T; Hong D; Fuxing P; Yonggang Y; Hong L
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Dec; 36(25):E1615-22. PubMed ID: 21270683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Research progress on the biological modifications of implant materials in 3D printed intervertebral fusion cages.
    Li S; Huan Y; Zhu B; Chen H; Tang M; Yan Y; Wang C; Ouyang Z; Li X; Xue J; Wang W
    J Mater Sci Mater Med; 2021 Dec; 33(1):2. PubMed ID: 34940930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Bone morphogenetic protein-2 application by a poly(D,L-lactide)-coated interbody cage: in vivo results of a new carrier for growth factors.
    Kandziora F; Bail H; Schmidmaier G; Schollmeier G; Scholz M; Knispel C; Hiller T; Pflugmacher R; Mittlmeier T; Raschke M; Haas NP
    J Neurosurg; 2002 Jul; 97(1 Suppl):40-8. PubMed ID: 12120650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Influence of the geometric and material properties of lumbar endplate on lumbar interbody fusion failure: a systematic review.
    Yu Y; Robinson DL; Ackland DC; Yang Y; Lee PVS
    J Orthop Surg Res; 2022 Apr; 17(1):224. PubMed ID: 35399075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. [Facet Fixation Combined with Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Comparative Analysis of Clinical Experience and A New Method of Surgical Treatment of Patients with Lumbar Degenerative Diseases].
    Byvaltsev VA; Kalinin AA; Okoneshnikova AK; Kerimbaev TT; Belykh EG
    Vestn Ross Akad Med Nauk; 2016; 71(5):375-84. PubMed ID: 29297667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Anterior discectomies and interbody cage fusion without plate fixation for 5-level cervical degenerative disc disease: a 5-year follow-up.
    Chu CW; Kung SS; Tsai TH; Huang TY; Hwang SL
    Kaohsiung J Med Sci; 2011 Nov; 27(11):524-7. PubMed ID: 22005163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.