216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34714037)
1. Anterior vs. Retzius-sparing robotic assisted radical prostatectomy: can the approach really make a difference?
Albisinni S; Dasnoy C; Diamand R; Mjaess G; Aoun F; Esperto F; Porpiglia F; Fiori C; Roumeguere T; DE Nunzio C
Minerva Urol Nephrol; 2022 Apr; 74(2):137-145. PubMed ID: 34714037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Retzius Sparing Radical Prostatectomy Versus Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Which Technique Is More Beneficial for Prostate Cancer Patients (MASTER Study)? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Barakat B; Othman H; Gauger U; Wolff I; Hadaschik B; Rehme C
Eur Urol Focus; 2022 Jul; 8(4):1060-1071. PubMed ID: 34429272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Retzius-sparing Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy Leads to Durable Improvement in Urinary Function and Quality of Life Versus Standard Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy Without Compromise on Oncologic Efficacy: Single-surgeon Series and Step-by-step Guide.
Egan J; Marhamati S; Carvalho FLF; Davis M; O'Neill J; Lee H; Lynch JH; Hankins RA; Hu JC; Kowalczyk KJ
Eur Urol; 2021 Jun; 79(6):839-857. PubMed ID: 32536488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial Examining the Impact of the Retzius-sparing Approach on Early Urinary Continence Recovery After Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy.
Dalela D; Jeong W; Prasad MA; Sood A; Abdollah F; Diaz M; Karabon P; Sammon J; Jamil M; Baize B; Simone A; Menon M
Eur Urol; 2017 Nov; 72(5):677-685. PubMed ID: 28483330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Retzius-sparing versus standard robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy for the treatment of clinically localized prostate cancer.
Rosenberg JE; Jung JH; Edgerton Z; Lee H; Lee S; Bakker CJ; Dahm P
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2020 Aug; 8(8):CD013641. PubMed ID: 32813279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Surgical and functional outcomes of Retzius-sparing robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy versus conventional robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy in patients with biopsy-confirmed prostate cancer. Are outcomes worth it? Systematic review and meta-analysis.
O'Connor-Cordova MA; Macías AGO; Sancen-Herrera JP; Altamirano-Lamarque F; Vargas Del Toro A; Peddinani BK; Canal-Zarate P; O'Connor-Juarez MA
Prostate; 2023 Nov; 83(15):1395-1414. PubMed ID: 37555617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Retzius sparing robotic assisted radical prostatectomy vs. conventional robotic assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Phukan C; Mclean A; Nambiar A; Mukherjee A; Somani B; Krishnamoorthy R; Sridhar A; Rajan P; Sooriakumaran P; Rai BP
World J Urol; 2020 May; 38(5):1123-1134. PubMed ID: 31089802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Retzius-sparing Robotic-assisted Radical Prostatectomy Facilitates Early Continence Regardless of Neurovascular Bundle Sparing.
Liao PC; Hung SC; Hu JC; Chiu KY
Anticancer Res; 2020 Jul; 40(7):4075-4080. PubMed ID: 32620655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Retzius-Sparing
Turkolmez K; Akpinar C; Kubilay E; Suer E
J Endourol; 2022 Sep; 36(9):1214-1222. PubMed ID: 35546454
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Is It Safe to Switch from a Standard Anterior to Retzius-Sparing Approach in Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy?
Lambert E; Allaeys C; Berquin C; De Visschere P; Verbeke S; Vanneste B; Fonteyne V; Van Praet C; Lumen N
Curr Oncol; 2023 Mar; 30(3):3447-3460. PubMed ID: 36975474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Outcomes of Retzius-sparing versus conventional robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: A KSER update series systematic review and meta-analysis.
Chung DY; Jung HD; Kim DK; Lee MH; Lee SW; Paick S; Lee JY; Jeon SH
PLoS One; 2022; 17(5):e0268182. PubMed ID: 35617274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy versus open retropubic radical prostatectomy: a prospective comparative study with 19-month follow-up.
Abdel Raheem A; Hagras A; Ghaith A; Alenzi MJ; Elghiaty A; Gameel T; Alowidah I; Ham WS; Choi YD; El-Bahnasy AH; Omar A; El-Bendary M; Rha KH
Minerva Urol Nefrol; 2020 Oct; 72(5):586-594. PubMed ID: 32748620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Postoperative functional and cancer control evaluation of conventional and Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: Comparison of selected cases by propensity score matching.
Kadono Y; Nohara T; Kawaguchi S; Kadomoto S; Iwamoto H; Yaegashi H; Iijima M; Shigehara K; Izumi K; Mizokami A
Prostate; 2023 Jun; 83(8):773-780. PubMed ID: 36879364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Can salvage Retzius-sparing robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy improve continence outcomes? A systematic review and meta-analysis study.
Nunes-Silva I; Hidaka AK; Glina FPA; Hayashi RM; Glina S
World J Urol; 2023 Sep; 41(9):2311-2317. PubMed ID: 37414943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. NeuroSAFE PROOF: study protocol for a single-blinded, IDEAL stage 3, multi-centre, randomised controlled trial of NeuroSAFE robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy versus standard robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy in men with localized prostate cancer.
Dinneen E; Grierson J; Almeida-Magana R; Clow R; Haider A; Allen C; Heffernan-Ho D; Freeman A; Briggs T; Nathan S; Mallett S; Brew-Graves C; Muirhead N; Williams NR; Pizzo E; Persad R; Aning J; Johnson L; Oxley J; Oakley N; Morgan S; Tahir F; Ahmad I; Dutto L; Salmond JM; Kelkar A; Kelly J; Shaw G
Trials; 2022 Jul; 23(1):584. PubMed ID: 35869497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Intermediate-Term Oncologic Outcome Assessment for Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Comparing Retzius-Sparing with Standard Approach in a Randomized Control Cohort.
Barayan GA; Majdalany SE; Butaney M; Dalela D; Peabody J; Abdolla F; Menon M; Jeong W
J Endourol; 2024 Jun; 38(6):559-563. PubMed ID: 38429913
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Functional Recovery, Oncologic Outcomes and Postoperative Complications after Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: An Evidence-Based Analysis Comparing the Retzius Sparing and Standard Approaches.
Menon M; Dalela D; Jamil M; Diaz M; Tallman C; Abdollah F; Sood A; Lehtola L; Miller D; Jeong W
J Urol; 2018 May; 199(5):1210-1217. PubMed ID: 29225060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of postoperative urinary continence and incontinence types between conventional and Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
Kadono Y; Nohara T; Kawaguchi S; Makino T; Naito R; Kadomoto S; Iwamoto H; Yaegashi H; Shigehara K; Izumi K; Mizokami A
Neurourol Urodyn; 2023 Aug; 42(6):1411-1420. PubMed ID: 37096807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A propensity score-matching study on retzius-sparing robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: Evidence of continence advantage on the early learning curve.
Yee CH; Liu AQ; Chiu PKF; Teoh JYC; Hou SSM; Ng CF
Asian J Surg; 2022 Jul; 45(7):1403-1407. PubMed ID: 34690053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy vs the standard approach: a systematic review and analysis of comparative outcomes.
Checcucci E; Veccia A; Fiori C; Amparore D; Manfredi M; Di Dio M; Morra I; Galfano A; Autorino R; Bocciardi AM; Dasgupta P; Porpiglia F
BJU Int; 2020 Jan; 125(1):8-16. PubMed ID: 31373142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
