These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34714037)

  • 1. Anterior vs. Retzius-sparing robotic assisted radical prostatectomy: can the approach really make a difference?
    Albisinni S; Dasnoy C; Diamand R; Mjaess G; Aoun F; Esperto F; Porpiglia F; Fiori C; Roumeguere T; DE Nunzio C
    Minerva Urol Nephrol; 2022 Apr; 74(2):137-145. PubMed ID: 34714037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Retzius Sparing Radical Prostatectomy Versus Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Which Technique Is More Beneficial for Prostate Cancer Patients (MASTER Study)? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Barakat B; Othman H; Gauger U; Wolff I; Hadaschik B; Rehme C
    Eur Urol Focus; 2022 Jul; 8(4):1060-1071. PubMed ID: 34429272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Retzius-sparing Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy Leads to Durable Improvement in Urinary Function and Quality of Life Versus Standard Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy Without Compromise on Oncologic Efficacy: Single-surgeon Series and Step-by-step Guide.
    Egan J; Marhamati S; Carvalho FLF; Davis M; O'Neill J; Lee H; Lynch JH; Hankins RA; Hu JC; Kowalczyk KJ
    Eur Urol; 2021 Jun; 79(6):839-857. PubMed ID: 32536488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial Examining the Impact of the Retzius-sparing Approach on Early Urinary Continence Recovery After Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy.
    Dalela D; Jeong W; Prasad MA; Sood A; Abdollah F; Diaz M; Karabon P; Sammon J; Jamil M; Baize B; Simone A; Menon M
    Eur Urol; 2017 Nov; 72(5):677-685. PubMed ID: 28483330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Retzius-sparing versus standard robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy for the treatment of clinically localized prostate cancer.
    Rosenberg JE; Jung JH; Edgerton Z; Lee H; Lee S; Bakker CJ; Dahm P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2020 Aug; 8(8):CD013641. PubMed ID: 32813279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Surgical and functional outcomes of Retzius-sparing robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy versus conventional robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy in patients with biopsy-confirmed prostate cancer. Are outcomes worth it? Systematic review and meta-analysis.
    O'Connor-Cordova MA; Macías AGO; Sancen-Herrera JP; Altamirano-Lamarque F; Vargas Del Toro A; Peddinani BK; Canal-Zarate P; O'Connor-Juarez MA
    Prostate; 2023 Nov; 83(15):1395-1414. PubMed ID: 37555617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Retzius sparing robotic assisted radical prostatectomy vs. conventional robotic assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Phukan C; Mclean A; Nambiar A; Mukherjee A; Somani B; Krishnamoorthy R; Sridhar A; Rajan P; Sooriakumaran P; Rai BP
    World J Urol; 2020 May; 38(5):1123-1134. PubMed ID: 31089802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Retzius-sparing Robotic-assisted Radical Prostatectomy Facilitates Early Continence Regardless of Neurovascular Bundle Sparing.
    Liao PC; Hung SC; Hu JC; Chiu KY
    Anticancer Res; 2020 Jul; 40(7):4075-4080. PubMed ID: 32620655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Retzius-Sparing
    Turkolmez K; Akpinar C; Kubilay E; Suer E
    J Endourol; 2022 Sep; 36(9):1214-1222. PubMed ID: 35546454
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Is It Safe to Switch from a Standard Anterior to Retzius-Sparing Approach in Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy?
    Lambert E; Allaeys C; Berquin C; De Visschere P; Verbeke S; Vanneste B; Fonteyne V; Van Praet C; Lumen N
    Curr Oncol; 2023 Mar; 30(3):3447-3460. PubMed ID: 36975474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Outcomes of Retzius-sparing versus conventional robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: A KSER update series systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Chung DY; Jung HD; Kim DK; Lee MH; Lee SW; Paick S; Lee JY; Jeon SH
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(5):e0268182. PubMed ID: 35617274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy versus open retropubic radical prostatectomy: a prospective comparative study with 19-month follow-up.
    Abdel Raheem A; Hagras A; Ghaith A; Alenzi MJ; Elghiaty A; Gameel T; Alowidah I; Ham WS; Choi YD; El-Bahnasy AH; Omar A; El-Bendary M; Rha KH
    Minerva Urol Nefrol; 2020 Oct; 72(5):586-594. PubMed ID: 32748620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Postoperative functional and cancer control evaluation of conventional and Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: Comparison of selected cases by propensity score matching.
    Kadono Y; Nohara T; Kawaguchi S; Kadomoto S; Iwamoto H; Yaegashi H; Iijima M; Shigehara K; Izumi K; Mizokami A
    Prostate; 2023 Jun; 83(8):773-780. PubMed ID: 36879364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Can salvage Retzius-sparing robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy improve continence outcomes? A systematic review and meta-analysis study.
    Nunes-Silva I; Hidaka AK; Glina FPA; Hayashi RM; Glina S
    World J Urol; 2023 Sep; 41(9):2311-2317. PubMed ID: 37414943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Retzius sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: optimizing functional results.
    Chierigo F; Caviglia A; Cellini V; Tappero S; Aigner M; Palagonia E; Olivero A; Secco S; Bocciardi AM; Dell'Oglio P; Galfano A
    World J Urol; 2024 Jun; 42(1):385. PubMed ID: 38916624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. NeuroSAFE PROOF: study protocol for a single-blinded, IDEAL stage 3, multi-centre, randomised controlled trial of NeuroSAFE robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy versus standard robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy in men with localized prostate cancer.
    Dinneen E; Grierson J; Almeida-Magana R; Clow R; Haider A; Allen C; Heffernan-Ho D; Freeman A; Briggs T; Nathan S; Mallett S; Brew-Graves C; Muirhead N; Williams NR; Pizzo E; Persad R; Aning J; Johnson L; Oxley J; Oakley N; Morgan S; Tahir F; Ahmad I; Dutto L; Salmond JM; Kelkar A; Kelly J; Shaw G
    Trials; 2022 Jul; 23(1):584. PubMed ID: 35869497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Intermediate-Term Oncologic Outcome Assessment for Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Comparing Retzius-Sparing with Standard Approach in a Randomized Control Cohort.
    Barayan GA; Majdalany SE; Butaney M; Dalela D; Peabody J; Abdolla F; Menon M; Jeong W
    J Endourol; 2024 Jun; 38(6):559-563. PubMed ID: 38429913
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Functional Recovery, Oncologic Outcomes and Postoperative Complications after Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: An Evidence-Based Analysis Comparing the Retzius Sparing and Standard Approaches.
    Menon M; Dalela D; Jamil M; Diaz M; Tallman C; Abdollah F; Sood A; Lehtola L; Miller D; Jeong W
    J Urol; 2018 May; 199(5):1210-1217. PubMed ID: 29225060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of postoperative urinary continence and incontinence types between conventional and Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
    Kadono Y; Nohara T; Kawaguchi S; Makino T; Naito R; Kadomoto S; Iwamoto H; Yaegashi H; Shigehara K; Izumi K; Mizokami A
    Neurourol Urodyn; 2023 Aug; 42(6):1411-1420. PubMed ID: 37096807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A propensity score-matching study on retzius-sparing robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: Evidence of continence advantage on the early learning curve.
    Yee CH; Liu AQ; Chiu PKF; Teoh JYC; Hou SSM; Ng CF
    Asian J Surg; 2022 Jul; 45(7):1403-1407. PubMed ID: 34690053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.