235 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34714051)
1. Strategic Carbon Dioxide Infrastructure to Achieve a Low-Carbon Power Sector in the Midwestern and South-Central United States.
Tao Y; Edwards RWJ; Mauzerall DL; Celia MA
Environ Sci Technol; 2021 Nov; 55(22):15013-15024. PubMed ID: 34714051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Economic feasibility and policy incentive analysis of Carbon Capture, Utilization, and Storage (CCUS) in coal-fired power plants based on system dynamics.
Ye J; Yan L; Liu X; Wei F
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Mar; 30(13):37487-37515. PubMed ID: 36572778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Decarbonizing the Coal-Fired Power Sector in China via Carbon Capture, Geological Utilization, and Storage Technology.
Wei N; Jiao Z; Ellett K; Ku AY; Liu S; Middleton R; Li X
Environ Sci Technol; 2021 Oct; 55(19):13164-13173. PubMed ID: 34549588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cost Analysis of Carbon Capture and Sequestration from U.S. Natural Gas-Fired Power Plants.
Psarras P; He J; Pilorgé H; McQueen N; Jensen-Fellows A; Kian K; Wilcox J
Environ Sci Technol; 2020 May; 54(10):6272-6280. PubMed ID: 32329614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Policy-Driven Potential for Deploying Carbon Capture and Sequestration in a Fossil-Rich Power Sector.
Dindi A; Coddington K; Garofalo JF; Wu W; Zhai H
Environ Sci Technol; 2022 Jul; 56(14):9872-9881. PubMed ID: 35785993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Opportunities for Decarbonizing Existing U.S. Coal-Fired Power Plants via CO2 Capture, Utilization and Storage.
Zhai H; Ou Y; Rubin ES
Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Jul; 49(13):7571-9. PubMed ID: 26023722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Fossil-Fuel Options for Power Sector Net-Zero Emissions with Sequestration Tax Credits.
Anderson JJ; Rode DC; Zhai H; Fischbeck PS
Environ Sci Technol; 2022 Aug; 56(16):11162-11171. PubMed ID: 35926127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Separation and capture of CO2 from large stationary sources and sequestration in geological formations--coalbeds and deep saline aquifers.
White CM; Strazisar BR; Granite EJ; Hoffman JS; Pennline HW;
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2003 Jun; 53(6):645-715. PubMed ID: 12828330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Infrastructure to enable deployment of carbon capture, utilization, and storage in the United States.
Edwards RWJ; Celia MA
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2018 Sep; 115(38):E8815-E8824. PubMed ID: 30181267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Near-term implications of a ban on new coal-fired power plants in the United States.
Newcomer A; Apt J
Environ Sci Technol; 2009 Jun; 43(11):3995-4001. PubMed ID: 19569321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessment of the US EPA's determination of the role for CO2 capture and storage in new fossil fuel-fired power plants.
Clark VR; Herzog HJ
Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Jul; 48(14):7723-9. PubMed ID: 24960207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Options for near-term phaseout of CO(2) emissions from coal use in the United States.
Kharecha PA; Kutscher CF; Hansen JE; Mazria E
Environ Sci Technol; 2010 Jun; 44(11):4050-62. PubMed ID: 20429611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Total cost of carbon capture and storage implemented at a regional scale: northeastern and midwestern United States.
Schmelz WJ; Hochman G; Miller KG
Interface Focus; 2020 Oct; 10(5):20190065. PubMed ID: 32832064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An optimization model for carbon capture & storage/utilization vs. carbon trading: A case study of fossil-fired power plants in Turkey.
Ağralı S; Üçtuğ FG; Türkmen BA
J Environ Manage; 2018 Jun; 215():305-315. PubMed ID: 29574208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Achieving Zero/Negative-Emissions Coal-Fired Power Plants Using Amine-Based Postcombustion CO
Jiang K; Feron P; Cousins A; Zhai R; Li K
Environ Sci Technol; 2020 Feb; 54(4):2429-2438. PubMed ID: 31990528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Water-carbon trade-off in China's coal power industry.
Zhang C; Anadon LD; Mo H; Zhao Z; Liu Z
Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Oct; 48(19):11082-9. PubMed ID: 25215622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A state-of-the-art review of CO
Jiang S; Li Y; Wang F; Sun H; Wang H; Yao Z
Environ Res; 2022 Jul; 210():112986. PubMed ID: 35192806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Committed emissions from existing energy infrastructure jeopardize 1.5 °C climate target.
Tong D; Zhang Q; Zheng Y; Caldeira K; Shearer C; Hong C; Qin Y; Davis SJ
Nature; 2019 Aug; 572(7769):373-377. PubMed ID: 31261374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Implications of Generation Efficiencies and Supply Chain Leaks for the Life Cycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Natural Gas-Fired Electricity in the United States.
Tavakkoli S; Feng L; Miller SM; Jordaan SM
Environ Sci Technol; 2022 Feb; 56(4):2540-2550. PubMed ID: 35107984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A Techno-Economic Assessment of Hybrid Cooling Systems for Coal- and Natural-Gas-Fired Power Plants with and without Carbon Capture and Storage.
Zhai H; Rubin ES
Environ Sci Technol; 2016 Apr; 50(7):4127-34. PubMed ID: 26967583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
