These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34714468)

  • 1. Automated high throughput pK
    Bahr MN; Nandkeolyar A; Kenna JK; Nevins N; Da Vià L; Işık M; Chodera JD; Mobley DL
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2021 Nov; 35(11):1141-1155. PubMed ID: 34714468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Overview of the SAMPL6 pK
    Işık M; Rustenburg AS; Rizzi A; Gunner MR; Mobley DL; Chodera JD
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2021 Feb; 35(2):131-166. PubMed ID: 33394238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quantum-mechanical property prediction of solvated drug molecules: what have we learned from a decade of SAMPL blind prediction challenges?
    Tielker N; Eberlein L; Hessler G; Schmidt KF; Güssregen S; Kast SM
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2021 Apr; 35(4):453-472. PubMed ID: 33079358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Blind prediction of cyclohexane-water distribution coefficients from the SAMPL5 challenge.
    Bannan CC; Burley KH; Chiu M; Shirts MR; Gilson MK; Mobley DL
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2016 Nov; 30(11):927-944. PubMed ID: 27677750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. pK
    Işık M; Levorse D; Rustenburg AS; Ndukwe IE; Wang H; Wang X; Reibarkh M; Martin GE; Makarov AA; Mobley DL; Rhodes T; Chodera JD
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Oct; 32(10):1117-1138. PubMed ID: 30406372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Measuring experimental cyclohexane-water distribution coefficients for the SAMPL5 challenge.
    Rustenburg AS; Dancer J; Lin B; Feng JA; Ortwine DF; Mobley DL; Chodera JD
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2016 Nov; 30(11):945-958. PubMed ID: 27718028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prediction of cyclohexane-water distribution coefficients with COSMO-RS on the SAMPL5 data set.
    Klamt A; Eckert F; Reinisch J; Wichmann K
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2016 Nov; 30(11):959-967. PubMed ID: 27460058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Extended solvent-contact model approach to blind SAMPL5 prediction challenge for the distribution coefficients of drug-like molecules.
    Chung KC; Park H
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2016 Nov; 30(11):1019-1033. PubMed ID: 27448686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. COSMO-RS blind prediction of distribution coefficients and aqueous pKa values from the SAMPL8 challenge.
    Diedenhofen M; Eckert F; Terzi S
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2023 Aug; 37(8):395-405. PubMed ID: 37365370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An overview of the SAMPL8 host-guest binding challenge.
    Amezcua M; Setiadi J; Ge Y; Mobley DL
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2022 Oct; 36(10):707-734. PubMed ID: 36229622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Partition coefficients for the SAMPL5 challenge using transfer free energies.
    Jones MR; Brooks BR; Wilson AK
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2016 Nov; 30(11):1129-1138. PubMed ID: 27646287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. SAMPL7 blind challenge: quantum-mechanical prediction of partition coefficients and acid dissociation constants for small drug-like molecules.
    Fındık BK; Haslak ZP; Arslan E; Aviyente V
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2021 Jul; 35(7):841-851. PubMed ID: 34164769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of log P, pK
    Bergazin TD; Tielker N; Zhang Y; Mao J; Gunner MR; Francisco K; Ballatore C; Kast SM; Mobley DL
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2021 Jul; 35(7):771-802. PubMed ID: 34169394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Octanol-water partition coefficient measurements for the SAMPL6 blind prediction challenge.
    Işık M; Levorse D; Mobley DL; Rhodes T; Chodera JD
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2020 Apr; 34(4):405-420. PubMed ID: 31858363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. In silico prediction of ionization constants of drugs.
    Lee PH; Ayyampalayam SN; Carreira LA; Shalaeva M; Bhattachar S; Coselmon R; Poole S; Gifford E; Lombardo F
    Mol Pharm; 2007; 4(4):498-512. PubMed ID: 17629304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Application of the alchemical transfer and potential of mean force methods to the SAMPL8 host-guest blinded challenge.
    Azimi S; Wu JZ; Khuttan S; Kurtzman T; Deng N; Gallicchio E
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2022 Jan; 36(1):63-76. PubMed ID: 35059940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A highly automated assay for determining the aqueous equilibrium solubility of drug discovery compounds.
    Wenlock MC; Austin RP; Potter T; Barton P
    J Lab Autom; 2011 Aug; 16(4):276-84. PubMed ID: 21764023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Molecular modeling of hydration in drug design.
    Mancera RL
    Curr Opin Drug Discov Devel; 2007 May; 10(3):275-80. PubMed ID: 17554853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The significance of acid/base properties in drug discovery.
    Manallack DT; Prankerd RJ; Yuriev E; Oprea TI; Chalmers DK
    Chem Soc Rev; 2013 Jan; 42(2):485-96. PubMed ID: 23099561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. New and original pKa prediction method using grid molecular interaction fields.
    Milletti F; Storchi L; Sforna G; Cruciani G
    J Chem Inf Model; 2007; 47(6):2172-81. PubMed ID: 17910431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.