198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34714535)
1. Performance of EUS-FNB in solid pancreatic masses: a lesson from 463 consecutive procedures and a practical nomogram.
Pagano N; Ricci C; Ingaldi C; Sadalla S; Fabbri A; Alberici L; Impellizeri G; Pallio S; Zagari RM; De Leo A; Cescon M; Casadei R
Updates Surg; 2022 Jun; 74(3):945-952. PubMed ID: 34714535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition with or without rapid on-site evaluation for solid pancreatic lesions: five years of experience from a single center.
Liu Y; Xiong D; Zhao Y; Meng Z; Wu X; Jiang Q; Wang Q; Wu D; Zhang S; Feng Y; Yang A
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2023; 58(10):1185-1193. PubMed ID: 37114616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Touch imprint cytology on endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle biopsy provides comparable sample quality and diagnostic yield to standard endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle aspiration specimens in the evaluation of solid pancreatic lesions.
Crinò SF; Larghi A; Bernardoni L; Parisi A; Frulloni L; Gabbrielli A; Parcesepe P; Scarpa A; Manfrin E
Cytopathology; 2019 Mar; 30(2):179-186. PubMed ID: 30484917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Does ProCore Fine-Needle Biopsy Really Improve the Clinical Outcome of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Sampling of Pancreatic Masses?
Delconte G; Cavalcoli F; Magarotto A; Centonze G; Bezzio C; Cattaneo L; Rausa E; Kelly ME; Bonitta G; Milione M; Enzo M
Dig Dis; 2022; 40(1):78-84. PubMed ID: 33780932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Feasibility and yield of a novel 22-gauge histology EUS needle in patients with pancreatic masses: a multicenter prospective cohort study.
Larghi A; Iglesias-Garcia J; Poley JW; Monges G; Petrone MC; Rindi G; Abdulkader I; Arcidiacono PG; Costamagna G; Biermann K; Bories E; Doglioni C; Dominguez-Muñoz JE; Hassan C; Bruno M; Giovannini M
Surg Endosc; 2013 Oct; 27(10):3733-8. PubMed ID: 23644834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Repeated endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy of solid pancreatic lesions after previous nondiagnostic or inconclusive sampling.
Lisotti A; Cominardi A; Conti Bellocchi MC; Crinò SF; Larghi A; Facciorusso A; Arcidiacono PG; De Angelis C; Di Matteo FM; Fabbri C; Bertani H; Togliani T; Rizzatti G; Brancaccio M; Grillo A; Fantin A; Pezzoli A; D'Errico F; Amato A; Antonini F; Montale A; Pisani A; Forti E; Manno M; Carrara S; Petrone MC; Binda C; Zagari RM; Fusaroli P;
Dig Endosc; 2024 May; 36(5):615-624. PubMed ID: 37712906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of solid pancreatic masses: 22-gauge aspiration versus 25-gauge biopsy needles.
Yang MJ; Yim H; Hwang JC; Lee D; Kim YB; Lim SG; Kim SS; Kang JK; Yoo BM; Kim JH
BMC Gastroenterol; 2015 Sep; 15():122. PubMed ID: 26419845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Biliary plastic stent does not influence the accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of pancreatic head masses performed with core biopsy needles.
Antonini F; Fuccio L; Giorgini S; Fabbri C; Frazzoni L; Scarpelli M; Macarri G
Dig Liver Dis; 2017 Aug; 49(8):898-902. PubMed ID: 28465092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Core biopsy needle versus standard aspiration needle for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of solid pancreatic masses: a randomized parallel-group study.
Lee YN; Moon JH; Kim HK; Choi HJ; Choi MH; Kim DC; Lee TH; Cha SW; Cho YD; Park SH
Endoscopy; 2014 Dec; 46(12):1056-62. PubMed ID: 25098611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluating triage protocols for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle biopsies of the pancreas.
Fitzpatrick MJ; Hernandez-Barco YG; Krishnan K; Casey B; Pitman MB
J Am Soc Cytopathol; 2020; 9(5):396-404. PubMed ID: 32620535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The efficacy and safety of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy in gallbladder masses.
Tong T; Tian L; Deng MZ; Chen XJ; Fu T; Ma KJ; Xu JH; Wang XY
Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int; 2023 Dec; 22(6):632-638. PubMed ID: 35331650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy with or without macroscopic on-site evaluation: a randomized controlled noninferiority trial.
Mangiavillano B; Crinò SF; Facciorusso A; Di Matteo F; Barbera C; Larghi A; Rizzatti G; Carrara S; Spadaccini M; Auriemma F; Fabbri C; Binda C; Coluccio C; Marocchi G; Staiano T; Conti Bellocchi MC; Bernardoni L; Eusebi LH; Cirota GG; De Nucci G; Stigliano S; Manes G; Bonanno G; Ofosu A; Lamonaca L; Paduano D; Spatola F; Repici A
Endoscopy; 2023 Feb; 55(2):129-137. PubMed ID: 36044915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy versus fine-needle aspiration for genomic profiling and DNA yield in pancreatic cancer: a randomized crossover trial.
Kandel P; Nassar A; Gomez V; Raimondo M; Woodward TA; Crook JE; Fares NS; Wallace MB
Endoscopy; 2021 Apr; 53(4):376-382. PubMed ID: 32767288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Analysis of Fine-Needle Biopsy vs Fine-Needle Aspiration in Diagnosis of Pancreatic and Abdominal Masses: A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial.
Cheng B; Zhang Y; Chen Q; Sun B; Deng Z; Shan H; Dou L; Wang J; Li Y; Yang X; Jiang T; Xu G; Wang G
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2018 Aug; 16(8):1314-1321. PubMed ID: 28733257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparative diagnostic performance of end-cutting fine-needle biopsy needles for EUS tissue sampling of solid pancreatic masses: a network meta-analysis.
Gkolfakis P; Crinò SF; Tziatzios G; Ramai D; Papaefthymiou A; Papanikolaou IS; Triantafyllou K; Arvanitakis M; Lisotti A; Fusaroli P; Mangiavillano B; Carrara S; Repici A; Hassan C; Facciorusso A
Gastrointest Endosc; 2022 Jun; 95(6):1067-1077.e15. PubMed ID: 35124072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Diagnostic yield of the SharkCore EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy.
Fitzpatrick MJ; Hernandez-Barco YG; Krishnan K; Brugge W; Casey B; Pitman MB
J Am Soc Cytopathol; 2019; 8(4):212-219. PubMed ID: 31076375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of 22G fine-needle aspiration (FNA) versus fine-needle biopsy (FNB) for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of pancreatic lesions: a prospective comparison study.
Tian L; Tang AL; Zhang L; Liu XW; Li JB; Wang F; Shen SR; Wang XY
Surg Endosc; 2018 Aug; 32(8):3533-3539. PubMed ID: 29404729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. In memoriam: Fine-needle aspiration, birth: Fine-needle biopsy: The changing trend in endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition.
Bang JY; Kirtane S; Krall K; Navaneethan U; Hasan M; Hawes R; Varadarajulu S
Dig Endosc; 2019 Mar; 31(2):197-202. PubMed ID: 30256458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A Comparison of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration and Fine-Needle Biopsy in the Diagnosis of Solid Pancreatic Lesions.
Ayres LR; Kmiotek EK; Lam E; Telford JJ
Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2018; 2018():1415062. PubMed ID: 29850451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. 22-Gauge biopsy needles have a better histological diagnostic yield in the discrimination of specific pancreatic solid neoplasms.
Jiang H; Guo J; Wang K; Zhu H; Chen J; Xu C; Wang D; Jin Z
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2019 Jan; 54(1):101-107. PubMed ID: 30731044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
