282 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34714592)
1. Bringing anatomy to life: Evaluating a novel ultrasound curriculum in the anatomy laboratory.
Lufler RS; Davis ML; Afifi LM; Willson RF; Croft PE
Anat Sci Educ; 2022 May; 15(3):609-619. PubMed ID: 34714592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Improved medical student perception of ultrasound using a paired anatomy teaching assistant and clinician teaching model.
Smith JP; Kendall JL; Royer DF
Anat Sci Educ; 2018 Mar; 11(2):175-184. PubMed ID: 28817242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Pilot Point-of-Care Ultrasound Curriculum at Harvard Medical School: Early Experience.
Rempell JS; Saldana F; DiSalvo D; Kumar N; Stone MB; Chan W; Luz J; Noble VE; Liteplo A; Kimberly H; Kohler MJ
West J Emerg Med; 2016 Nov; 17(6):734-740. PubMed ID: 27833681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cognitive load imposed by ultrasound-facilitated teaching does not adversely affect gross anatomy learning outcomes.
Jamniczky HA; Cotton D; Paget M; Ramji Q; Lenz R; McLaughlin K; Coderre S; Ma IW
Anat Sci Educ; 2017 Mar; 10(2):144-151. PubMed ID: 27533319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Musculoskeletal ultrasound training encourages self-directed learning and increases confidence for clinical and anatomical appreciation of first-year medical students.
Brown CC; Arrington SD; Olson JF; Finch CA; Nydam RL
Anat Sci Educ; 2022 May; 15(3):508-521. PubMed ID: 34674381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Measuring the impact of the flipped anatomy classroom: The importance of categorizing an assessment by Bloom's taxonomy.
Morton DA; Colbert-Getz JM
Anat Sci Educ; 2017 Mar; 10(2):170-175. PubMed ID: 27427860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Virtual anatomy and point-of-care ultrasonography integration pilot for medical students.
Olivares-Perez ME; Graglia S; Harmon DJ; Klein BA
Anat Sci Educ; 2022 May; 15(3):464-475. PubMed ID: 34748279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of an innovative hands-on anatomy-centered ultrasound curriculum to supplement graduate gross anatomy education.
Royer DF; Kessler R; Stowell JR
Anat Sci Educ; 2017 Jul; 10(4):348-362. PubMed ID: 27870531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Outcomes and satisfaction of two optional cadaveric dissection courses: A 3-year prospective study.
Pais D; Casal D; Mascarenhas-Lemos L; Barata P; Moxham BJ; Goyri-O'Neill J
Anat Sci Educ; 2017 Mar; 10(2):127-136. PubMed ID: 27483443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Association of a longitudinal, preclinical ultrasound curriculum with medical student performance.
Haidar DA; Kessler R; Khanna NK; Cover MT; Burkhardt JC; Theyyunni N; Tucker RV; Huang RD; Holman E; Bridge PD; Klein KA; Fung CM
BMC Med Educ; 2022 Jan; 22(1):50. PubMed ID: 35062942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Using generalizability analysis to estimate parameters for anatomy assessments: A multi-institutional study.
Byram JN; Seifert MF; Brooks WS; Fraser-Cotlin L; Thorp LE; Williams JM; Wilson AB
Anat Sci Educ; 2017 Mar; 10(2):109-119. PubMed ID: 27458988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The use of self-learning modules to facilitate learning of basic science concepts in an integrated medical curriculum.
Khalil MK; Nelson LD; Kibble JD
Anat Sci Educ; 2010; 3(5):219-26. PubMed ID: 20814914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Performance equivalency between computer-based and traditional pen-and-paper assessment: A case study in clinical anatomy.
Guimarães B; Ribeiro J; Cruz B; Ferreira A; Alves H; Cruz-Correia R; Madeira MD; Ferreira MA
Anat Sci Educ; 2018 Mar; 11(2):124-136. PubMed ID: 28817229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Longitudinal retention of anatomical knowledge in second-year medical students.
Doomernik DE; van Goor H; Kooloos JGM; Ten Broek RP
Anat Sci Educ; 2017 Jun; 10(3):242-248. PubMed ID: 27706913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Living and post-mortem CT scans in the gross anatomy lab: A study investigating differences in first-year medical students' exam performance and perceptions.
Brown W; Afshari S; Zhou M; Lythgoe J; Walsh R; Hielscher AC
Anat Sci Educ; 2024; 17(3):468-482. PubMed ID: 38213130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Impact of Anatomy Boot Camp on Students in a Medical Gross Anatomy Course.
Herling PJ; Mohseni BT; Hill DC; Chelf S; Rickert JA; Leo JT; Langley NR
Anat Sci Educ; 2017 Jun; 10(3):215-223. PubMed ID: 27662606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluating dissection in the gross anatomy course: Correlation between quality of laboratory dissection and students outcomes.
Nwachukwu C; Lachman N; Pawlina W
Anat Sci Educ; 2015; 8(1):45-52. PubMed ID: 24799441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Perceptions of first-year medical students towards learning anatomy using cadaveric specimens through peer teaching.
Agius A; Calleja N; Camenzuli C; Sultana R; Pullicino R; Zammit C; Calleja Agius J; Pomara C
Anat Sci Educ; 2018 Jul; 11(4):346-357. PubMed ID: 29112798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A psychometric evaluation of the anatomy learning experiences questionnaire and correlations with learning outcomes.
Choi-Lundberg DL; Williams AM; Zimitat C
Anat Sci Educ; 2017 Nov; 10(6):514-527. PubMed ID: 28423232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of undergraduate medical students' preference to human anatomy practical assessment methodology: a comparison between online and traditional methods.
Sadeesh T; Prabavathy G; Ganapathy A
Surg Radiol Anat; 2021 Apr; 43(4):531-535. PubMed ID: 33386929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
