176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34715131)
1. Designer proteins that competitively inhibit Gα
Hussain M; Cummins MC; Endo-Streeter S; Sondek J; Kuhlman B
J Biol Chem; 2021 Dec; 297(6):101348. PubMed ID: 34715131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Potent and Selective Peptide-based Inhibition of the G Protein Gαq.
Charpentier TH; Waldo GL; Lowery-Gionta EG; Krajewski K; Strahl BD; Kash TL; Harden TK; Sondek J
J Biol Chem; 2016 Dec; 291(49):25608-25616. PubMed ID: 27742837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The binding of activated Gα
Navaratnarajah P; Gershenson A; Ross EM
J Biol Chem; 2017 Oct; 292(40):16787-16801. PubMed ID: 28842497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Characterization of the GRK2 binding site of Galphaq.
Day PW; Tesmer JJ; Sterne-Marr R; Freeman LC; Benovic JL; Wedegaertner PB
J Biol Chem; 2004 Dec; 279(51):53643-52. PubMed ID: 15471870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An intact helical domain is required for Gα14 to stimulate phospholipase Cβ.
Kwan DH; Wong KM; Chan AS; Yung LY; Wong YH
BMC Struct Biol; 2015 Sep; 15():18. PubMed ID: 26377666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Activation of Phospholipase C β by Gβγ and Gα
Fisher IJ; Jenkins ML; Tall GG; Burke JE; Smrcka AV
Structure; 2020 Jul; 28(7):810-819.e5. PubMed ID: 32402248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. PLCβ isoforms differ in their subcellular location and their CT-domain dependent interaction with Gαq.
Adjobo-Hermans MJ; Crosby KC; Putyrski M; Bhageloe A; van Weeren L; Schultz C; Goedhart J; Gadella TW
Cell Signal; 2013 Jan; 25(1):255-63. PubMed ID: 23006664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Galpha(q) and phospholipase C-beta: turn on, turn off, and do it fast.
Ross EM
Sci Signal; 2011 Feb; 4(159):pe5. PubMed ID: 21304157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Intrinsic Pleckstrin Homology (PH) Domain Motion in Phospholipase C-β Exposes a Gβγ Protein Binding Site.
Kadamur G; Ross EM
J Biol Chem; 2016 May; 291(21):11394-406. PubMed ID: 27002154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. On the selectivity of the Gαq inhibitor UBO-QIC: A comparison with the Gαi inhibitor pertussis toxin.
Gao ZG; Jacobson KA
Biochem Pharmacol; 2016 May; 107():59-66. PubMed ID: 26954502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Full-length Gα(q)-phospholipase C-β3 structure reveals interfaces of the C-terminal coiled-coil domain.
Lyon AM; Dutta S; Boguth CA; Skiniotis G; Tesmer JJ
Nat Struct Mol Biol; 2013 Mar; 20(3):355-62. PubMed ID: 23377541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Structural design principles that underlie the multi-specific interactions of Gα
Navot S; Kosloff M
Sci Rep; 2019 May; 9(1):6898. PubMed ID: 31053791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Structural Elements in the Gαs and Gαq C Termini That Mediate Selective G Protein-coupled Receptor (GPCR) Signaling.
Semack A; Sandhu M; Malik RU; Vaidehi N; Sivaramakrishnan S
J Biol Chem; 2016 Aug; 291(34):17929-40. PubMed ID: 27330078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Phospholipase C-beta1 directly accelerates GTP hydrolysis by Galphaq and acceleration is inhibited by Gbeta gamma subunits.
Chidiac P; Ross EM
J Biol Chem; 1999 Jul; 274(28):19639-43. PubMed ID: 10391901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Disruption of the interaction between mutationally activated Gα
Aumiller JL; Wedegaertner PB
J Biol Chem; 2023 Feb; 299(2):102880. PubMed ID: 36626984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Kinetic scaffolding mediated by a phospholipase C-beta and Gq signaling complex.
Waldo GL; Ricks TK; Hicks SN; Cheever ML; Kawano T; Tsuboi K; Wang X; Montell C; Kozasa T; Sondek J; Harden TK
Science; 2010 Nov; 330(6006):974-80. PubMed ID: 20966218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Decoding Gαq signaling.
Litosch I
Life Sci; 2016 May; 152():99-106. PubMed ID: 27012764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Gαq signalling: the new and the old.
Sánchez-Fernández G; Cabezudo S; García-Hoz C; Benincá C; Aragay AM; Mayor F; Ribas C
Cell Signal; 2014 May; 26(5):833-48. PubMed ID: 24440667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Gα
Hudson BN; Jessup RE; Prahalad KK; Lyon AM
Biochemistry; 2019 Aug; 58(32):3454-3467. PubMed ID: 31322863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Differential contribution of GTPase activation and effector antagonism to the inhibitory effect of RGS proteins on Gq-mediated signaling in vivo.
Anger T; Zhang W; Mende U
J Biol Chem; 2004 Feb; 279(6):3906-15. PubMed ID: 14630933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
