These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34715622)

  • 41. A PCE groundwater plume discharging to a river: influence of the streambed and near-river zone on contaminant distributions.
    Conant B; Cherry JA; Gillham RW
    J Contam Hydrol; 2004 Sep; 73(1-4):249-79. PubMed ID: 15336797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Spatial interpolation methods for nonstationary plume data.
    Reed PM; Ellsworth TR; Minsker BS
    Ground Water; 2004; 42(2):190-202. PubMed ID: 15035584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Determination of spatially-resolved porosity, tracer distributions and diffusion coefficients in porous media using MRI measurements and numerical simulations.
    Marica F; Jofré SA; Mayer KU; Balcom BJ; Al TA
    J Contam Hydrol; 2011 Jul; 125(1-4):47-56. PubMed ID: 21669472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Contamination Transport in the Coastal Unconfined Aquifer under the Influences of Seawater Intrusion and Inland Freshwater Recharge-Laboratory Experiments and Numerical Simulations.
    Guo Q; Zhao Y; Hu Z; Li M
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Jan; 18(2):. PubMed ID: 33477433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Remediating Contaminant Plumes in Groundwater with Shallow Excavations Containing Coarse Reactive Media.
    Hudak PF
    Environ Manage; 2018 Feb; 61(2):304-309. PubMed ID: 29282532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. A Coupled Groundwater-Surface Water Modeling Framework for Simulating Transition Zone Processes.
    Mugunthan P; Russell KT; Gong B; Riley MJ; Chin A; McDonald BG; Eastcott LJ
    Ground Water; 2017 May; 55(3):302-315. PubMed ID: 27775831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Reactive dispersive contaminant transport in coastal aquifers: numerical simulation of a reactive Henry problem.
    Nick HM; Raoof A; Centler F; Thullner M; Regnier P
    J Contam Hydrol; 2013 Feb; 145():90-104. PubMed ID: 23334209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Simulating contaminant transport in unsaturated and saturated groundwater zones.
    Sarma R; Singh SK
    Water Environ Res; 2021 Sep; 93(9):1496-1509. PubMed ID: 33714215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Multi-component reactive transport modeling of natural attenuation of an acid groundwater plume at a uranium mill tailings site.
    Zhu C; Hu FQ; Burden DS
    J Contam Hydrol; 2001 Nov; 52(1-4):85-108. PubMed ID: 11695747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. The importance of transects for characterizing aged organic contaminant plumes in groundwater.
    Steelman CM; Meyer JR; Wanner P; Swanson BJ; Conway-White O; Parker BL
    J Contam Hydrol; 2020 Nov; 235():103728. PubMed ID: 33069942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. The impact of low-temperature seasonal aquifer thermal energy storage (SATES) systems on chlorinated solvent contaminated groundwater: modeling of spreading and degradation.
    Zuurbier KG; Hartog N; Valstar J; Post VE; van Breukelen BM
    J Contam Hydrol; 2013 Apr; 147():1-13. PubMed ID: 23435174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Groundwater pumping effects on contaminant loading management in agricultural regions.
    Park DK; Bae GO; Kim SK; Lee KK
    J Environ Manage; 2014 Jun; 139():97-108. PubMed ID: 24681649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Comparison of permeable reactive barrier, funnel and gate, nonpumped wells, and low-capacity wells for groundwater remediation.
    Hudak PF
    J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng; 2014; 49(10):1171-5. PubMed ID: 24844898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Modeling contaminant transport and remediation at an acrylonitrile spill site in Turkey.
    Sengör SS; Unlü K
    J Contam Hydrol; 2013 Jul; 150():77-92. PubMed ID: 23680827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. On the validity of travel-time based nonlinear bioreactive transport models in steady-state flow.
    Sanz-Prat A; Lu C; Finkel M; Cirpka OA
    J Contam Hydrol; 2015; 175-176():26-43. PubMed ID: 25723340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Impact of Local Groundwater Flow Model Errors on Transport and a Practical Solution for the Issue.
    Panday S; Bedekar V; Langevin CD
    Ground Water; 2018 Jul; 56(4):667-672. PubMed ID: 29272551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Integral quantification of contaminant mass flow rates in a contaminated aquifer: conditioning of the numerical inversion of concentration-time series.
    Herold M; Ptak T; Bayer-Raich M; Wendel T; Grathwohl P
    J Contam Hydrol; 2009 Apr; 106(1-2):29-38. PubMed ID: 19167131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. A semi-analytical solution for simulating contaminant transport subject to chain-decay reactions.
    Sudicky EA; Hwang HT; Illman WA; Wu YS; Kool JB; Huyakorn P
    J Contam Hydrol; 2013 Jan; 144(1):20-45. PubMed ID: 23153684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Upstream Dispersion in Solute Transport Models: A Simple Evaluation and Reduction Methodology.
    Irvine DJ; Werner AD; Ye Y; Jazayeri A
    Ground Water; 2021 Mar; 59(2):287-291. PubMed ID: 32754918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Use of Multiple Data Assimilation Techniques in Groundwater Contaminant Transport Modeling.
    Rajib AI; Assumaning GA; Chang SY; Addai EB
    Water Environ Res; 2017 Nov; 89(11):1952-1960. PubMed ID: 29080564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.