155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34716821)
1. Motion preservation surgery for scoliosis with a vertebral body tethering system: a biomechanical study.
Nicolini LF; Kobbe P; Seggewiß J; Greven J; Ribeiro M; Beckmann A; Da Paz S; Eschweiler J; Prescher A; Markert B; Stoffel M; Hildebrand F; Trobisch PD
Eur Spine J; 2022 Apr; 31(4):1013-1021. PubMed ID: 34716821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Tether pre-tension within vertebral body tethering reduces motion of the spine and influences coupled motion: a finite element analysis.
Nicolini LF; Oliveira RC; Ribeiro M; Stoffel M; Markert B; Kobbe P; Hildebrand F; Trobisch P; Simões MS; de Mello Roesler CR; Fancello EA
Comput Biol Med; 2024 Feb; 169():107851. PubMed ID: 38113683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Risk of Implant Loosening After Cyclic Loading of Fusionless Growth Modulation Techniques: Nitinol Staples Versus Flexible Tether.
Yaszay B; Doan JD; Parvaresh KC; Farnsworth CL
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2017 Apr; 42(7):443-449. PubMed ID: 27454539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Preclinical testing of a wedge-rod system for fusionless correction of scoliosis.
Betz RR; Cunningham B; Selgrath C; Drewry T; Sherman MC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Oct; 28(20):S275-8. PubMed ID: 14560203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Non-fusion instrumentation of the lumbar spine with a hinged pedicle screw rod system: an in vitro experiment.
Schmoelz W; Onder U; Martin A; von Strempel A
Eur Spine J; 2009 Oct; 18(10):1478-85. PubMed ID: 19504129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Measurable Lumbar Motion Remains 1 Year After Vertebral Body Tethering.
Mathew SE; Milbrandt TA; Larson AN
J Pediatr Orthop; 2022 Sep; 42(8):e861-e867. PubMed ID: 35878415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Superior-segment Bilateral Facet Violation in Lumbar Transpedicular Fixation, Part III: A Biomechanical Study of Severe Violation.
Xu Y; Le X; Zhang Q; Kuai S; Leng H; Duan F; Shi Z; Liu B; He D; Lang Z; Wu J; Wang L; Tian W
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2020 May; 45(9):E508-E514. PubMed ID: 31770344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The effect of vertebral body tethering on spine range of motion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a pilot study.
Maksimovic M; Beaudette SM; Livock H; Tice A; Jarvis J; Smit K; Graham RB
Spine Deform; 2023 Jan; 11(1):123-131. PubMed ID: 36114988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An initial biomechanical investigation of fusionless anterior tether constructs for controlled scoliosis correction.
Lavelle WF; Moldavsky M; Cai Y; Ordway NR; Bucklen BS
Spine J; 2016 Mar; 16(3):408-13. PubMed ID: 26582489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Hybrid dynamic stabilization: a biomechanical assessment of adjacent and supraadjacent levels of the lumbar spine.
Mageswaran P; Techy F; Colbrunn RW; Bonner TF; McLain RF
J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 Sep; 17(3):232-42. PubMed ID: 22839756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An investigation of range of motion preservation in fusionless anterior double screw and cord constructs for scoliosis correction.
Trobisch P; Mahoney JM; Eichenlaub EK; Antonacci CL; Cuddihy L; Amin DB; Razo-Castaneda D; Orbach MR; McGuckin JP; Bucklen BS; Antonacci MD; Betz RR
Eur Spine J; 2023 Apr; 32(4):1173-1186. PubMed ID: 36871254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Biomechanical comparison of semirigid junctional fixation techniques to prevent proximal junctional failure after thoracolumbar adult spinal deformity correction.
Doodkorte RJP; Roth AK; Arts JJ; Lataster LMA; van Rhijn LW; Willems PC
Spine J; 2021 May; 21(5):855-864. PubMed ID: 33493681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Biomechanical evaluation of a simulated T-9 burst fracture of the thoracic spine with an intact rib cage.
Perry TG; Mageswaran P; Colbrunn RW; Bonner TF; Francis T; McLain RF
J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Sep; 21(3):481-8. PubMed ID: 24949903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biomechanical analysis of an interspinous fusion device as a stand-alone and as supplemental fixation to posterior expandable interbody cages in the lumbar spine.
Gonzalez-Blohm SA; Doulgeris JJ; Aghayev K; Lee WE; Volkov A; Vrionis FD
J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Feb; 20(2):209-19. PubMed ID: 24286528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The biomechanical effect of single-level laminectomy and posterior instrumentation on spinal stability in degenerative lumbar scoliosis: a human cadaveric study.
Rustenburg CME; Faraj SSA; Holewijn RM; Kingma I; van Royen BJ; Stadhouder A; Emanuel KS
Neurosurg Focus; 2019 May; 46(5):E15. PubMed ID: 31042658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. T9 versus T10 as the upper instrumented vertebra for correction of adult deformity-rationale and recommendations.
Hey HWD; Tan KA; Neo CS; Lau ET; Choong DA; Lau LL; Liu GK; Wong HK
Spine J; 2017 May; 17(5):615-621. PubMed ID: 27856380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Is a gradual reduction of stiffness on top of posterior instrumentation possible with a suitable proximal implant? A biomechanical study.
Lange T; Schmoelz W; Gosheger G; Eichinger M; Heinrichs CH; Boevingloh AS; Schulte TL
Spine J; 2017 Aug; 17(8):1148-1155. PubMed ID: 28373080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Properties of an interspinous fixation device (ISD) in lumbar fusion constructs: a biomechanical study.
Techy F; Mageswaran P; Colbrunn RW; Bonner TF; McLain RF
Spine J; 2013 May; 13(5):572-9. PubMed ID: 23498926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Preliminary outcomes after vertebral body tethering (VBT) for lumbar curves and subanalysis of a 1- versus 2-tether construct.
Trobisch PD; Baroncini A
Eur Spine J; 2021 Dec; 30(12):3570-3576. PubMed ID: 34591175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Spinal instrumentation after complete resection of the last lumbar vertebra: an in vitro biomechanical study after L5 spondylectomy.
Bartanusz V; Muzumdar A; Hussain M; Moldavsky M; Bucklen B; Khalil S
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Jun; 36(13):1017-21. PubMed ID: 21224772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
