These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34717038)
1. Comparison of postoperative complications and long-term oncological outcomes in minimally invasive versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for distal cholangiocarcinoma: A propensity score-matched analysis. Kim SH; Lee B; Hwang HK; Lee JS; Han HS; Lee WJ; Yoon YS; Kang CM J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci; 2022 Mar; 29(3):329-337. PubMed ID: 34717038 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Long-term Outcomes After Laparoscopic, Robotic, and Open Pancreatoduodenectomy for Distal Cholangiocarcinoma: An International Propensity Score-matched Cohort Study. Uijterwijk BA; Lemmers DHL; Bolm L; Luyer M; Koh YX; Mazzola M; Webber L; Kazemier G; Bannone E; Ramaekers M; Ielpo B; Wellner U; Koek S; Giani A; Besselink MG; Abu Hilal M; Ann Surg; 2023 Sep; 278(3):e570-e579. PubMed ID: 36730852 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Robotic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy for distal cholangiocarcinoma: a multicenter propensity score-matched study. Xu S; Zhang XP; Zhao GD; Zou WB; Zhao ZM; Hu MG; Gao YX; Tan XL; Liu Q; Liu R Surg Endosc; 2022 Nov; 36(11):8237-8248. PubMed ID: 35534733 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Improved outcomes with minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy in patients with dilated pancreatic ducts: a prospective study. Cos H; LeCompte MT; Srinivasa S; Zarate Rodriguez J; Woolsey CA; Williams G; Patel S; Khan A; Fields RC; Majella Doyle MB; Chapman WC; Strasberg SM; Hawkins WG; Hammill CW; Sanford DE Surg Endosc; 2022 May; 36(5):3100-3109. PubMed ID: 34235587 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Short-term outcomes after minimally invasive versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy in elderly patients: a propensity score-matched analysis. Yin SM; Liu YW; Liu YY; Yong CC; Wang CC; Li WF; Yeh CH BMC Surg; 2021 Jan; 21(1):60. PubMed ID: 33494734 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Perioperative and oncologic outcome of robot-assisted minimally invasive (hybrid laparoscopic and robotic) pancreatoduodenectomy: based on pancreatic fistula risk score and cancer/staging matched comparison with open pancreatoduodenectomy. Kim HS; Kim H; Kwon W; Han Y; Byun Y; Kang JS; Choi YJ; Jang JY Surg Endosc; 2021 Apr; 35(4):1675-1681. PubMed ID: 32277354 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Minimally invasive vs open pancreatoduodenectomy on oncological adequacy: a propensity score-matched analysis. Ashouri Y; Ho K; Ho H; Hsu CH; Ghaderi I; Riall TS; Konstantinidis IT; Maegawa FB Surg Endosc; 2022 Oct; 36(10):7302-7311. PubMed ID: 35178590 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Minimally invasive versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: Individual patient data meta-analysis of randomized trials. Uijterwijk BA; Wei K; Kasai M; Ielpo B; Hilst JV; Chinnusamy P; Lemmers DHL; Burdio F; Senthilnathan P; Besselink MG; Abu Hilal M; Qin R Eur J Surg Oncol; 2023 Aug; 49(8):1351-1361. PubMed ID: 37076411 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Minimally invasive versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy for distal bile duct cancer: an inverse probability of treatment weighting analysis of outcomes. Lee W; Song KB; Hong S; Park Y; Kwak BJ; Jun E; Hwang DW; Kim S; Lee JH; Kim SC Surg Endosc; 2023 Feb; 37(2):881-890. PubMed ID: 36018360 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Minimally invasive versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic and peri-ampullary neoplasm (DIPLOMA-2): study protocol for an international multicenter patient-blinded randomized controlled trial. de Graaf N; Emmen AMLH; Ramera M; Björnsson B; Boggi U; Bruna CL; Busch OR; Daams F; Ferrari G; Festen S; van Hilst J; D'Hondt M; Ielpo B; Keck T; Khatkov IE; Koerkamp BG; Lips DJ; Luyer MDP; Mieog JSD; Morelli L; Molenaar IQ; van Santvoort HC; Sprangers MAG; Ferrari C; Berkhof J; Maisonneuve P; Abu Hilal M; Besselink MG; Trials; 2023 Oct; 24(1):665. PubMed ID: 37828593 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The experience of the minimally invasive (MI) fellowship-trained (FT) hepatic-pancreatic and biliary (HPB) surgeon: could the outcome of MI pancreatoduodenectomy for peri-ampullary tumors be better than open? Gumbs AA; Chouillard E; Abu Hilal M; Croner R; Gayet B; Gagner M Surg Endosc; 2021 Sep; 35(9):5256-5267. PubMed ID: 33146810 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The clinical implication of minimally invasive versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for non-pancreatic periampullary cancer: a systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis. Uijterwijk BA; Kasai M; Lemmers DHL; Chinnusamy P; van Hilst J; Ielpo B; Wei K; Song KB; Kim SC; Klompmaker S; Jang JY; Herremans KM; Bencini L; Coratti A; Mazzola M; Menon KV; Goh BKP; Qin R; Besselink MG; Abu Hilal M; Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2023 Aug; 408(1):311. PubMed ID: 37581763 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of Minimally Invasive Versus Open Pancreatoduodenectomy for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis. Kwon J; Song KB; Park SY; Shin D; Hong S; Park Y; Lee W; Lee JH; Hwang DW; Kim SC Cancers (Basel); 2020 Apr; 12(4):. PubMed ID: 32326595 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Morbidity and survival after laparoscopic versus open pancreatoduodenectomy: propensity score matched comparison. Vandeputte M; Vansteenkiste F; Ceelen W; De Meyere C; D'Hondt M Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2023 Jan; 408(1):16. PubMed ID: 36624235 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparing Short-term and Oncologic Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Versus Open Pancreaticoduodenectomy Across Low and High Volume Centers. Torphy RJ; Friedman C; Halpern A; Chapman BC; Ahrendt SS; McCarter MM; Edil BH; Schulick RD; Gleisner A Ann Surg; 2019 Dec; 270(6):1147-1155. PubMed ID: 29771723 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Outcomes After Minimally-invasive Versus Open Pancreatoduodenectomy: A Pan-European Propensity Score Matched Study. Klompmaker S; van Hilst J; Wellner UF; Busch OR; Coratti A; D'Hondt M; Dokmak S; Festen S; Kerem M; Khatkov I; Lips DJ; Lombardo C; Luyer M; Manzoni A; Molenaar IQ; Rosso E; Saint-Marc O; Vansteenkiste F; Wittel UA; Bonsing B; Groot Koerkamp B; Abu Hilal M; Fuks D; Poves I; Keck T; Boggi U; Besselink MG; Ann Surg; 2020 Feb; 271(2):356-363. PubMed ID: 29864089 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Minimally invasive approaches increase postoperative complications in obese patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy during the initial development period: a propensity score matching study. Wei TH; Su PJ; Lu WH; Liao TK; Wang CJ; Lai CH; Chiu PH; Su PF; Chao YJ; Shan YS Surg Endosc; 2023 Apr; 37(4):2770-2780. PubMed ID: 36477639 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy is associated with lower morbidity compared to open pancreatoduodenectomy: An updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and high-quality nonrandomized studies. Yan JF; Pan Y; Chen K; Zhu HP; Chen QL Medicine (Baltimore); 2019 Aug; 98(32):e16730. PubMed ID: 31393381 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Minimally Invasive Versus Open Pancreaticoduodenectomy: A Propensity-matched Study From a National Cohort of Patients. Nassour I; Wang SC; Christie A; Augustine MM; Porembka MR; Yopp AC; Choti MA; Mansour JC; Xie XJ; Polanco PM; Minter RM Ann Surg; 2018 Jul; 268(1):151-157. PubMed ID: 28486387 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) and totally laparoscopic PD after overcoming learning curves with comparison of oncologic outcomes between open PD and minimally invasive PD. Kang JS; Lee M; Lee JS; Han Y; Sohn HJ; Lee B; Kim M; Kwon W; Han HS; Yoon YS; Jang JY Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg; 2024 Nov; 28(4):508-515. PubMed ID: 39313241 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]