199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34717038)
1. Comparison of postoperative complications and long-term oncological outcomes in minimally invasive versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for distal cholangiocarcinoma: A propensity score-matched analysis.
Kim SH; Lee B; Hwang HK; Lee JS; Han HS; Lee WJ; Yoon YS; Kang CM
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci; 2022 Mar; 29(3):329-337. PubMed ID: 34717038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Long-term Outcomes After Laparoscopic, Robotic, and Open Pancreatoduodenectomy for Distal Cholangiocarcinoma: An International Propensity Score-matched Cohort Study.
Uijterwijk BA; Lemmers DHL; Bolm L; Luyer M; Koh YX; Mazzola M; Webber L; Kazemier G; Bannone E; Ramaekers M; Ielpo B; Wellner U; Koek S; Giani A; Besselink MG; Abu Hilal M;
Ann Surg; 2023 Sep; 278(3):e570-e579. PubMed ID: 36730852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Robotic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy for distal cholangiocarcinoma: a multicenter propensity score-matched study.
Xu S; Zhang XP; Zhao GD; Zou WB; Zhao ZM; Hu MG; Gao YX; Tan XL; Liu Q; Liu R
Surg Endosc; 2022 Nov; 36(11):8237-8248. PubMed ID: 35534733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Improved outcomes with minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy in patients with dilated pancreatic ducts: a prospective study.
Cos H; LeCompte MT; Srinivasa S; Zarate Rodriguez J; Woolsey CA; Williams G; Patel S; Khan A; Fields RC; Majella Doyle MB; Chapman WC; Strasberg SM; Hawkins WG; Hammill CW; Sanford DE
Surg Endosc; 2022 May; 36(5):3100-3109. PubMed ID: 34235587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Short-term outcomes after minimally invasive versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy in elderly patients: a propensity score-matched analysis.
Yin SM; Liu YW; Liu YY; Yong CC; Wang CC; Li WF; Yeh CH
BMC Surg; 2021 Jan; 21(1):60. PubMed ID: 33494734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Perioperative and oncologic outcome of robot-assisted minimally invasive (hybrid laparoscopic and robotic) pancreatoduodenectomy: based on pancreatic fistula risk score and cancer/staging matched comparison with open pancreatoduodenectomy.
Kim HS; Kim H; Kwon W; Han Y; Byun Y; Kang JS; Choi YJ; Jang JY
Surg Endosc; 2021 Apr; 35(4):1675-1681. PubMed ID: 32277354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Minimally invasive vs open pancreatoduodenectomy on oncological adequacy: a propensity score-matched analysis.
Ashouri Y; Ho K; Ho H; Hsu CH; Ghaderi I; Riall TS; Konstantinidis IT; Maegawa FB
Surg Endosc; 2022 Oct; 36(10):7302-7311. PubMed ID: 35178590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Minimally invasive versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: Individual patient data meta-analysis of randomized trials.
Uijterwijk BA; Wei K; Kasai M; Ielpo B; Hilst JV; Chinnusamy P; Lemmers DHL; Burdio F; Senthilnathan P; Besselink MG; Abu Hilal M; Qin R
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2023 Aug; 49(8):1351-1361. PubMed ID: 37076411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Minimally invasive versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy for distal bile duct cancer: an inverse probability of treatment weighting analysis of outcomes.
Lee W; Song KB; Hong S; Park Y; Kwak BJ; Jun E; Hwang DW; Kim S; Lee JH; Kim SC
Surg Endosc; 2023 Feb; 37(2):881-890. PubMed ID: 36018360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Minimally invasive versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic and peri-ampullary neoplasm (DIPLOMA-2): study protocol for an international multicenter patient-blinded randomized controlled trial.
de Graaf N; Emmen AMLH; Ramera M; Björnsson B; Boggi U; Bruna CL; Busch OR; Daams F; Ferrari G; Festen S; van Hilst J; D'Hondt M; Ielpo B; Keck T; Khatkov IE; Koerkamp BG; Lips DJ; Luyer MDP; Mieog JSD; Morelli L; Molenaar IQ; van Santvoort HC; Sprangers MAG; Ferrari C; Berkhof J; Maisonneuve P; Abu Hilal M; Besselink MG;
Trials; 2023 Oct; 24(1):665. PubMed ID: 37828593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The experience of the minimally invasive (MI) fellowship-trained (FT) hepatic-pancreatic and biliary (HPB) surgeon: could the outcome of MI pancreatoduodenectomy for peri-ampullary tumors be better than open?
Gumbs AA; Chouillard E; Abu Hilal M; Croner R; Gayet B; Gagner M
Surg Endosc; 2021 Sep; 35(9):5256-5267. PubMed ID: 33146810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The clinical implication of minimally invasive versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for non-pancreatic periampullary cancer: a systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis.
Uijterwijk BA; Kasai M; Lemmers DHL; Chinnusamy P; van Hilst J; Ielpo B; Wei K; Song KB; Kim SC; Klompmaker S; Jang JY; Herremans KM; Bencini L; Coratti A; Mazzola M; Menon KV; Goh BKP; Qin R; Besselink MG; Abu Hilal M;
Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2023 Aug; 408(1):311. PubMed ID: 37581763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of Minimally Invasive Versus Open Pancreatoduodenectomy for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.
Kwon J; Song KB; Park SY; Shin D; Hong S; Park Y; Lee W; Lee JH; Hwang DW; Kim SC
Cancers (Basel); 2020 Apr; 12(4):. PubMed ID: 32326595
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Morbidity and survival after laparoscopic versus open pancreatoduodenectomy: propensity score matched comparison.
Vandeputte M; Vansteenkiste F; Ceelen W; De Meyere C; D'Hondt M
Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2023 Jan; 408(1):16. PubMed ID: 36624235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparing Short-term and Oncologic Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Versus Open Pancreaticoduodenectomy Across Low and High Volume Centers.
Torphy RJ; Friedman C; Halpern A; Chapman BC; Ahrendt SS; McCarter MM; Edil BH; Schulick RD; Gleisner A
Ann Surg; 2019 Dec; 270(6):1147-1155. PubMed ID: 29771723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Outcomes After Minimally-invasive Versus Open Pancreatoduodenectomy: A Pan-European Propensity Score Matched Study.
Klompmaker S; van Hilst J; Wellner UF; Busch OR; Coratti A; D'Hondt M; Dokmak S; Festen S; Kerem M; Khatkov I; Lips DJ; Lombardo C; Luyer M; Manzoni A; Molenaar IQ; Rosso E; Saint-Marc O; Vansteenkiste F; Wittel UA; Bonsing B; Groot Koerkamp B; Abu Hilal M; Fuks D; Poves I; Keck T; Boggi U; Besselink MG;
Ann Surg; 2020 Feb; 271(2):356-363. PubMed ID: 29864089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Minimally invasive approaches increase postoperative complications in obese patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy during the initial development period: a propensity score matching study.
Wei TH; Su PJ; Lu WH; Liao TK; Wang CJ; Lai CH; Chiu PH; Su PF; Chao YJ; Shan YS
Surg Endosc; 2023 Apr; 37(4):2770-2780. PubMed ID: 36477639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy is associated with lower morbidity compared to open pancreatoduodenectomy: An updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and high-quality nonrandomized studies.
Yan JF; Pan Y; Chen K; Zhu HP; Chen QL
Medicine (Baltimore); 2019 Aug; 98(32):e16730. PubMed ID: 31393381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Minimally Invasive Versus Open Pancreaticoduodenectomy: A Propensity-matched Study From a National Cohort of Patients.
Nassour I; Wang SC; Christie A; Augustine MM; Porembka MR; Yopp AC; Choti MA; Mansour JC; Xie XJ; Polanco PM; Minter RM
Ann Surg; 2018 Jul; 268(1):151-157. PubMed ID: 28486387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Wrapping double-mattress anastomosis for pancreaticojejunostomy in minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy can significantly reduce postoperative pancreatic fistula rate compared with conventional pancreaticojejunostomy in open surgery: An analysis of a propensity score-matched sample.
Kiguchi G; Sugioka A; Uchida Y; Yoshikawa J; Nakauchi M; Kojima M; Tanahashi Y; Takahara T; Yasuda A; Suda K; Kato Y; Uyama I
Surg Oncol; 2021 Sep; 38():101577. PubMed ID: 33887674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
