114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34717472)
21. Binaural sensitivity and release from speech-on-speech masking in listeners with and without hearing loss.
Baltzell LS; Swaminathan J; Cho AY; Lavandier M; Best V
J Acoust Soc Am; 2020 Mar; 147(3):1546. PubMed ID: 32237845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Binaural interference effects measured with masking-level difference and with ITD- and IID-discrimination paradigms.
Bernstein LR; Trahiotis C
J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Jul; 98(1):155-63. PubMed ID: 7608395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The normalized correlation: accounting for binaural detection across center frequency.
Bernstein LR; Trahiotis C
J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Dec; 100(6):3774-84. PubMed ID: 8969479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The normalized interaural correlation: accounting for NoS pi thresholds obtained with Gaussian and "low-noise" masking noise.
Bernstein LR; van de Par S; Trahiotis C
J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Aug; 106(2):870-6. PubMed ID: 10462792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Age-Related Changes in Interaural-Level-Difference-Based Across-Frequency Binaural Interference.
Goupell MJ
Front Aging Neurosci; 2022; 14():887401. PubMed ID: 35966775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Improving Sensitivity of the Digits-In-Noise Test Using Antiphasic Stimuli.
De Sousa KC; Swanepoel W; Moore DR; Myburgh HC; Smits C
Ear Hear; 2020; 41(2):442-450. PubMed ID: 31425362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Effects of non-simultaneous masking on the binaural masking level difference.
Buss E; Hall Iii JW
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Feb; 129(2):907-19. PubMed ID: 21361448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Contralateral Interference Caused by Binaurally Presented Competing Speech in Adult Bilateral Cochlear-Implant Users.
Goupell MJ; Stakhovskaya OA; Bernstein JGW
Ear Hear; 2018; 39(1):110-123. PubMed ID: 28787316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Measures of extents of laterality for high-frequency "transposed" stimuli under conditions of binaural interference.
Bernstein LR; Trahiotis C
J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Sep; 118(3 Pt 1):1626-35. PubMed ID: 16240822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparing Binaural Pre-processing Strategies III: Speech Intelligibility of Normal-Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Listeners.
Völker C; Warzybok A; Ernst SM
Trends Hear; 2015 Dec; 19():. PubMed ID: 26721922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Monaural and binaural frequency selectivity in hearing-impaired subjects.
Nitschmann M; Verhey JL; Kollmeier B
Int J Audiol; 2010 May; 49(5):357-67. PubMed ID: 20210590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Binaural modulation masking.
Grantham DW; Bacon SP
J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Mar; 89(3):1340-9. PubMed ID: 2030221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Binaural detection with spectrally nonoverlapping signals and maskers: evidence for masking by aural distortion products.
van der Heijden M; Trahiotis C
J Acoust Soc Am; 1997 Nov; 102(5 Pt 1):2966-72. PubMed ID: 9373983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Acoustic Hearing Can Interfere With Single-Sided Deafness Cochlear-Implant Speech Perception.
Bernstein JGW; Stakhovskaya OA; Jensen KK; Goupell MJ
Ear Hear; 2020; 41(4):747-761. PubMed ID: 31584504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Spectral contributions to the benefit from spatial separation of speech and noise.
Dubno JR; Ahlstrom JB; Horwitz AR
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2002 Dec; 45(6):1297-310. PubMed ID: 12546495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Head Shadow and Binaural Squelch for Unilaterally Deaf Cochlear Implantees.
Bernstein JGW; Schuchman GI; Rivera AL
Otol Neurotol; 2017 Aug; 38(7):e195-e202. PubMed ID: 28570414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Interference and enhancement effects on interaural time discrimination and level discrimination in listeners with normal hearing and those with hearing loss.
Smith-Olinde L; Besing J; Koehnke J
Am J Audiol; 2004 Jun; 13(1):80-95. PubMed ID: 15248807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Speech reception with different bilateral directional processing schemes: Influence of binaural hearing, audiometric asymmetry, and acoustic scenario.
Neher T; Wagener KC; Latzel M
Hear Res; 2017 Sep; 353():36-48. PubMed ID: 28783570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The effect of different cochlear implant microphones on acoustic hearing individuals' binaural benefits for speech perception in noise.
Aronoff JM; Freed DJ; Fisher LM; Pal I; Soli SD
Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):468-84. PubMed ID: 21412155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Spectral and binaural loudness summation for hearing-impaired listeners.
Oetting D; Hohmann V; Appell JE; Kollmeier B; Ewert SD
Hear Res; 2016 May; 335():179-192. PubMed ID: 27006003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
