BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3471831)

  • 1. The effect of four preparation techniques on the amount of apically extruded debris.
    Fairbourn DR; McWalter GM; Montgomery S
    J Endod; 1987 Mar; 13(3):102-8. PubMed ID: 3471831
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Experimental study of canal trajectory using sonic instruments].
    Cochet JY; Barril I; Laurichesse JM
    Rev Fr Endod; 1986 Sep; 5(3):21-31. PubMed ID: 3474732
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An in vitro histological comparison of the step-back, sonic, and ultrasonic instrumentation techniques in small, curved root canals.
    Reynolds MA; Madison S; Walton RE; Krell KV; Rittman BR
    J Endod; 1987 Jul; 13(7):307-14. PubMed ID: 3481796
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [SEM study of the surface conditions after manual, mechanical, sonic and ultrasonic canal preparation].
    Ciucchi B; Dietschi JM; Cergneux M; Holz J
    Inf Dent; 1986 May; 68(18):1693-7. PubMed ID: 3462142
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Comparative SEM study of the shape of the canal after manual, mechanical, sonic and ultrasonic preparation].
    Dietschi J; Ciucchi B; Cergneux M; Holz J
    Inf Dent; 1986 May; 68(18):1687-91. PubMed ID: 3462141
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Cleansing and shaping of curved canals: S.E.M. evaluation of an ultrasonic endodontic instrument].
    Pagavino G; Pace R; Ciabattini G
    G Stomatol Ortognatodonzia; 1989; 8(2):39-46. PubMed ID: 2485788
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of amounts of apically extruded debris using handpiece-driven nickel-titanium instrument systems.
    Hinrichs RE; Walker WA; Schindler WG
    J Endod; 1998 Feb; 24(2):102-6. PubMed ID: 9641140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Histological evaluation of the efficiency of manual or ultrasonic instrumentation in upper molars (curved or twisted wide and narrow canals)].
    Esberard RM; Utrilla LS
    Odontol Clin; 1988; 2(1):25-8. PubMed ID: 3267794
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An evaluation of guidelines for the apical enlargement of maxillary premolars.
    Kasahara E; Yasuda E; Yamada H; Miyazawa A
    J Endod; 1991 Jan; 17(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 1895032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [SEM evaluation of manual endodontics and a system using ultrasonics in canal preparation].
    Curiale F; Cassaro A; Margiotta V; Buzzanca R
    Stomatol Mediterr; 1985; 5(4):407-11. PubMed ID: 3870055
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Hand versus ultrasonic instrumentation: its effect on canal shape and instrumentation time.
    Pedicord D; elDeeb ME; Messer HH
    J Endod; 1986 Sep; 12(9):375-81. PubMed ID: 3463644
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of endosonic instrumentation in simulated curved root canals.
    Kielt LW; Montgomery S
    J Endod; 1987 May; 13(5):215-9. PubMed ID: 3473177
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [SEM studies on root canal preparation using ultrasound].
    Beer R; Gängler P
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1989 May; 44(5):334-9. PubMed ID: 2639044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Acoustic technic to evaluate root length].
    Sebban C; Varin P
    Dent Cadmos; 1979 Jul; 47(7):25-31. PubMed ID: 297571
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Endodontic therapy in curved canals].
    Goracci G; Cantatore G
    Dent Cadmos; 1987 Dec; 55(20):39-47. PubMed ID: 3483816
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Ultrasonic preparation of the root canal].
    Moriya K; Osada T
    Acta Clin Odontol; 1988 Dec; 11(22):5-9. PubMed ID: 3272095
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Conservative treatment of apical foramen. New root canal techniques.
    Christie WH; Peikoff MD
    J Can Dent Assoc; 1980 Mar; 46(3):183-8. PubMed ID: 6986964
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The apex: how critical is it?
    Simon JH
    Gen Dent; 1994; 42(4):330-4. PubMed ID: 7835670
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An in vitro comparison study to quantitate the debridement ability of hand, sonic, and ultrasonic instrumentation.
    Stamos DE; Sadeghi EM; Haasch GC; Gerstein H
    J Endod; 1987 Sep; 13(9):434-40. PubMed ID: 3482102
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Endosonic endodontics: the ultrasonic synergistic system.
    Martin H; Cunningham W
    Int Dent J; 1984 Sep; 34(3):198-203. PubMed ID: 6592150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.