159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34719475)
21. [Three-dimensional study of facial soft tissue changes in patients with skeletal Class
Shi Y; Shang H; Tian L; Bai S; Liu W; Liu Y
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2018 May; 32(5):612-616. PubMed ID: 29806352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. 'Study of the maxillary yaw on cone beam computed tomography: A preliminary report and comparison between two different dento-skeletal malocclusions'.
Vernucci RA; Da Mommio L; Vellone V; De Stefano A; Barbato E; Di Giorgio R; Galluccio G
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2023 Nov; 26(4):576-584. PubMed ID: 36912723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. In vivo comparison of MRI- and CBCT-based 3D cephalometric analysis: beginning of a non-ionizing diagnostic era in craniomaxillofacial imaging?
Juerchott A; Freudlsperger C; Weber D; Jende JME; Saleem MA; Zingler S; Lux CJ; Bendszus M; Heiland S; Hilgenfeld T
Eur Radiol; 2020 Mar; 30(3):1488-1497. PubMed ID: 31802215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Comparison of linear and angular measurements using two-dimensional conventional methods and three-dimensional cone beam CT images reconstructed from a volumetric rendering program in vivo.
Oz U; Orhan K; Abe N
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2011 Dec; 40(8):492-500. PubMed ID: 22065798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Linear accuracy and reliability of cone beam CT derived 3-dimensional images constructed using an orthodontic volumetric rendering program.
Periago DR; Scarfe WC; Moshiri M; Scheetz JP; Silveira AM; Farman AG
Angle Orthod; 2008 May; 78(3):387-95. PubMed ID: 18416632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Malocclusion Class II division 1 skeletal and dental relationships measured by cone-beam computed tomography.
Xu Y; Oh H; Lagravère MO
Int Orthod; 2017 Sep; 15(3):365-387. PubMed ID: 28818647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Orthodontic soft-tissue parameters: a comparison of cone-beam computed tomography and the 3dMD imaging system.
Metzger TE; Kula KS; Eckert GJ; Ghoneima AA
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Nov; 144(5):672-81. PubMed ID: 24182583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Assessment of Volume and Height of the Coronoid Process in Patients With Different Facial Types and Skeletal Classes: A Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Study.
Gomes AF; Nejaim Y; Brasil DM; Groppo FC; Ferreira Caria PH; Haiter Neto F
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Jul; 73(7):1395.e1-5. PubMed ID: 25976692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Cephalometric measurements from 3D reconstructed images compared with conventional 2D images.
Zamora N; Llamas JM; Cibrián R; Gandia JL; Paredes V
Angle Orthod; 2011 Sep; 81(5):856-64. PubMed ID: 21469969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Accuracy of 3 Soft Tissue Prediction Methods After Double-Jaw Orthognathic Surgery in Class III Patients.
Demirsoy KK; Kurt G
Ann Plast Surg; 2022 Mar; 88(3):323-329. PubMed ID: 34670968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Spatial analysis of condyle position according to sagittal skeletal relationship, assessed by cone beam computed tomography.
Arieta-Miranda JM; Silva-Valencia M; Flores-Mir C; Paredes-Sampen NA; Arriola-Guillen LE
Prog Orthod; 2013 Oct; 14():36. PubMed ID: 24325842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Accuracy and Reproducibility of Facial Measurements of Digital Photographs and Wrapped Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) Photographs.
Alhammadi MS; Al-Mashraqi AA; Alnami RH; Ashqar NM; Alamir OH; Halboub E; Reda R; Testarelli L; Patil S
Diagnostics (Basel); 2021 Apr; 11(5):. PubMed ID: 33922543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Accuracy and repeatability of anthropometric facial measurements using cone beam computed tomography.
Fourie Z; Damstra J; Gerrits PO; Ren Y
Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2011 Sep; 48(5):623-30. PubMed ID: 20849272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Artifact-resistant superimposition of digital dental models and cone-beam computed tomography images.
Lin HH; Chiang WC; Lo LJ; Sheng-Pin Hsu S; Wang CH; Wan SY
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Nov; 71(11):1933-47. PubMed ID: 23911142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Two-Dimensional and Three-Dimensional Cephalometry Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography Scans.
Cassetta M; Altieri F; Di Giorgio R; Silvestri A
J Craniofac Surg; 2015 Jun; 26(4):e311-5. PubMed ID: 26080244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A comparison between two-dimensional and three-dimensional cephalometry on frontal radiographs and on cone beam computed tomography scans of human skulls.
van Vlijmen OJ; Maal TJ; Bergé SJ; Bronkhorst EM; Katsaros C; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM
Eur J Oral Sci; 2009 Jun; 117(3):300-5. PubMed ID: 19583759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Post-operative soft tissue changes in patients with mandibular prognathism after bimaxillary surgery.
Oh KM; Seo SK; Park JE; Sim HS; Cevidanes LH; Kim YJ; Park YH
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2013 Apr; 41(3):204-11. PubMed ID: 23058178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The reliability of cephalometric measurements in oral and maxillofacial imaging: Cone beam computed tomography versus two-dimensional digital cephalograms.
Hariharan A; Diwakar NR; Jayanthi K; Hema HM; Deepukrishna S; Ghaste SR
Indian J Dent Res; 2016; 27(4):370-377. PubMed ID: 27723632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Three-dimensional analysis of soft tissue changes in full-face view after surgical correction of skeletal class III malocclusion.
Yuan L; Shen G; Wu Y; Jiang L; Yang Z; Liu J; Mao L; Fang B
J Craniofac Surg; 2013 May; 24(3):725-30. PubMed ID: 23714867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Differences in the 3-dimensional aging changes of the lips among female adults with skeletal Class I, II, and III malocclusion.
Nam JH; Choi Y; Lee KJ; Lee JH; Kim KH; Chung CJ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2023 Oct; 164(4):516-529. PubMed ID: 37074244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
