These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34720524)

  • 21. Goodness-of-fit tests for the Compound Rayleigh distribution with application to real data.
    Badr MM
    Heliyon; 2019 Aug; 5(8):e02225. PubMed ID: 31517082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Distribution-free simultaneous tests for location-scale and Lehmann alternative in two-sample problem.
    Kössler W; Mukherjee A
    Biom J; 2020 Jan; 62(1):99-123. PubMed ID: 31631379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Exact tests for Hardy-Weinberg proportions.
    Engels WR
    Genetics; 2009 Dec; 183(4):1431-41. PubMed ID: 19797043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. APPROXIMATING POWER OF THE UNCONDITIONAL TEST FOR CORRELATED BINARY PAIRS.
    Selicato GR; Muller KE
    Commun Stat Simul Comput; 1998; 27(2):553-564. PubMed ID: 24465078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Sample size determination for testing equality in Poisson frequency data under an AB/BA crossover trial.
    Lui KJ
    Pharm Stat; 2013; 12(2):74-81. PubMed ID: 23364859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Uniform approximation is more appropriate for Wilcoxon Rank-Sum Test in gene set analysis.
    Fang Z; Du R; Cui X
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(2):e31505. PubMed ID: 22347488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A comparison of exact tests for trend with binary endpoints using Bartholomew's statistic.
    Consiglio JD; Shan G; Wilding GE
    Int J Biostat; 2014; 10(2):221-30. PubMed ID: 25324456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Asymptotic versus exact methods in the analysis of contingency tables: Evidence-based practical recommendations.
    García-Pérez MA; Núñez-Antón V
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2020 Sep; 29(9):2569-2582. PubMed ID: 32020833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. AN EXACT GOODNESS-OF-FIT TEST BASED ON THE OCCUPANCY PROBLEMS TO STUDY ZERO-INFLATION AND ZERO-DEFLATION IN BIOLOGICAL DOSIMETRY DATA.
    Fernández-Fontelo A; Puig P; Ainsbury EA; Higueras M
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2018 Jun; 179(4):317-326. PubMed ID: 29342297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Cauchy combination test: a powerful test with analytic
    Liu Y; Xie J
    J Am Stat Assoc; 2020; 115(529):393-402. PubMed ID: 33012899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Exact and Monte carlo resampling procedures for the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney and Kruskal-Wallis tests.
    Berry KJ; Mielke PW
    Percept Mot Skills; 2000 Dec; 91(3 Pt 1):749-54. PubMed ID: 11153842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Exact change point detection with improved power in small-sample binomial sequences.
    Ellenberger D; Lausen B; Friede T
    Biom J; 2021 Mar; 63(3):558-574. PubMed ID: 33151005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Analysis of Poisson frequency data under a simple crossover trial.
    Lui KJ; Chang KC
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2016 Feb; 25(1):385-99. PubMed ID: 22899697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Modified Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney Test and Power against Strong Null.
    Fong Y; Huang Y
    Am Stat; 2019; 73(1):43-49. PubMed ID: 30899120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Tests against qualitative interaction: exact critical values and robust tests.
    Silvapulle MJ
    Biometrics; 2001 Dec; 57(4):1157-65. PubMed ID: 11764256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A class of multivariate distribution-free tests of independence based on graphs.
    Heller R; Gorfine M; Heller Y
    J Stat Plan Inference; 2012 Dec; 142(12):3097-3106. PubMed ID: 23956488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Two sample comparisons including zero-inflated continuous data: A parametric approach with applications to microarray experiment.
    Kulkarni HV; Patil KP
    Math Biosci; 2018 Apr; 298():19-28. PubMed ID: 29412157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A discussion on significance indices for contingency tables under small sample sizes.
    Oliveira NL; Pereira CAB; Diniz MA; Polpo A
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(8):e0199102. PubMed ID: 30071022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Significance tests for analyzing gene expression data with small sample sizes.
    Ullah I; Paul S; Hong Z; Wang YG
    Bioinformatics; 2019 Oct; 35(20):3996-4003. PubMed ID: 30874796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Evaluating the power of a recent method for comparing two circular distributions: an alternative to the Watson U
    Ruxton GD; Malkemper EP; Landler L
    Sci Rep; 2023 Jun; 13(1):10007. PubMed ID: 37340039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.