182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34722059)
21. Permanent Compared With Absorbable Suture in Apical Prolapse Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Pollack BL; Popiel P; Toaff MC; Drugge E; Bielawski A; Sacks A; Bibi M; Friedman-Ciment R; LeBron K; Alishahian L; Phillips D; Rubino SR; Pollack S; Khan RS; Khan ES; Pape DM; Grimes CL
Obstet Gynecol; 2023 Feb; 141(2):268-283. PubMed ID: 36649334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparison of efficacy between laparoscopic pectopexy and laparoscopic high uterosacral ligament suspension in the treatment of apical prolapse-short term results.
Peng J; Li S; Wang L; Yang L; Nai M; Xu Q; Jin Y; Liu P; Li L
Sci Rep; 2023 Oct; 13(1):18519. PubMed ID: 37898708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Laparoscopic inguinal ligament suspension: a novel procedure to repair uterine prolapse.
Dai Z; Li H; Shu H; Guan X; Zhang K
Int Urogynecol J; 2019 Apr; 30(4):657-660. PubMed ID: 30361770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Laparoscopic management of uterine prolapse with cystocele and rectocele using "Gynemesh PS".
Lee HJ; Lee YS; Koo TB; Cho YL; Park IS
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2008 Feb; 18(1):93-8. PubMed ID: 18266583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Total Vaginal Hysterectomy With Uterosacral Ligament Suspension Compared With Supracervical Hysterectomy With Sacrocervicopexy for Uterovaginal Prolapse.
Giugale LE; Melnyk AI; Ruppert KM; Napoe GS; Lavelle ES; Bradley MS
Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Sep; 138(3):435-442. PubMed ID: 34352830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Guideline No. 413: Surgical Management of Apical Pelvic Organ Prolapse in Women.
Geoffrion R; Larouche M
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2021 Apr; 43(4):511-523.e1. PubMed ID: 33548503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Laparoscopic inguinal ligament suspension combined with hysterectomy for the treatment of uterovaginal prolapse.
Li C; Dai Z; Shu H
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2019 Sep; 45(9):1918-1924. PubMed ID: 31264339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies.
Serati M; Bogani G; Sorice P; Braga A; Torella M; Salvatore S; Uccella S; Cromi A; Ghezzi F
Eur Urol; 2014 Aug; 66(2):303-18. PubMed ID: 24631406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [Laparoscopic high uterosacral ligament suspension combined with cervical amputation in treatment of women severe uterine prolapsed at child-bearing period].
Sun Z; Zhu L; Hu H; Lang J; Shi H; Gong X
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2014 Mar; 49(3):167-71. PubMed ID: 24820298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Readmission and emergency department visits after minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy and vaginal apical pelvic organ prolapse surgery.
Berger AA; Tan-Kim J; Menefee SA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Nov; 225(5):552.e1-552.e7. PubMed ID: 34437864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Assessing the Impact of Vaginal Hysterectomy with Vaginal Mesh Attachment on Outcomes and Complications during Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy.
Woodburn KL; Bradley SE; Ward SA; Schirm KA; Clarke B; Gutman RE; Sokol AI
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2023 Jan; 30(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 36223863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Safety and one year outcomes following vaginally assisted laparoscopic uterine sacropexy (VALUES) for advanced uterine prolapse.
Fayyad AM; Siozos CS
Neurourol Urodyn; 2014 Mar; 33(3):345-9. PubMed ID: 23729356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Laparoscopic uterosacral ligament suspension versus vaginal colposuspension using the Uphold Lite™ mesh system: clinical outcome and patient satisfaction.
Chill HH; Gutman-Ido E; Navon I; Reuveni-Salzman A; Haj-Yahya R; Shveiky D
Int Urogynecol J; 2021 Jun; 32(6):1513-1518. PubMed ID: 33084960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Effect of uterine preservation on outcome of laparoscopic uterosacral suspension.
Bedford ND; Seman EI; O'Shea RT; Keirse MJ
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2013; 20(2):172-7. PubMed ID: 23321154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy with laparoscopic uterosacral ligament suspension for the treatment of apical pelvic organ prolapse.
Crigler B; Zakaria M; Hart S
Surg Technol Int; 2012 Dec; 22():195-202. PubMed ID: 23225594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Surgical interventions for uterine prolapse and for vault prolapse: the two VUE RCTs.
Hemming C; Constable L; Goulao B; Kilonzo M; Boyers D; Elders A; Cooper K; Smith A; Freeman R; Breeman S; McDonald A; Hagen S; Montgomery I; Norrie J; Glazener C
Health Technol Assess; 2020 Mar; 24(13):1-220. PubMed ID: 32138809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Positive symptom improvement with laparoscopic uterosacral ligament repair for uterine or vaginal vault prolapse: interim results from an active multicenter trial.
Schwartz M; Abbott KR; Glazerman L; Sobolewski C; Jarnagin B; Ailawadi R; Lucente V
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2007; 14(5):570-6. PubMed ID: 17848317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for uterine and post-hysterectomy prolapse: anatomical results, quality of life and perioperative outcome-a prospective study with 101 cases.
Sarlos D; Brandner S; Kots L; Gygax N; Schaer G
Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct; 2008 Oct; 19(10):1415-22. PubMed ID: 18536861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy and apical suspension: 7-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial.
Izett-Kay ML; Rahmanou P; Cartwright RJ; Price N; Jackson SR
Int Urogynecol J; 2022 Jul; 33(7):1957-1965. PubMed ID: 34424347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Recurrence of vaginal prolapse after total vaginal hysterectomy with concurrent vaginal uterosacral ligament suspension: comparison between normal-weight and overweight women.
Rappa C; Saccone G
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Nov; 215(5):601.e1-601.e4. PubMed ID: 27342042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
