These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34722774)

  • 1. Energy-Related Scatter Analysis for Determining the Effective Point of Measurement of Cylindrical Ion Chamber in Heavy Charged Particle Carbon Ion Beam.
    Ma XY; Zhang YS; Meng WB; Qi Y; Li Q; Ye YC; Wu JM
    Biomed Res Int; 2021; 2021():8808537. PubMed ID: 34722774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Measurement of peak correction factor of Farmer chamber for calibration of flattening filter free (FFF) clinical photon beams].
    Kontra G; Major T; Polgár C
    Magy Onkol; 2015 Jun; 59(2):119-23. PubMed ID: 26035159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dosimetric characterization of a microDiamond detector in clinical scanned carbon ion beams.
    Marinelli M; Prestopino G; Verona C; Verona-Rinati G; Ciocca M; Mirandola A; Mairani A; Raffaele L; Magro G
    Med Phys; 2015 Apr; 42(4):2085-93. PubMed ID: 25832098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Experimental determination of the effective point of measurement of cylindrical ionization chambers for high-energy photon and electron beams.
    Huang Y; Willomitzer C; Zakaria GA; Hartmann GH
    Phys Med; 2010; 26(3):126-31. PubMed ID: 19926506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effective point of measurement of cylindrical ionization chambers for heavy charged particles.
    Jäkel O; Hartmann GH; Heeg P; Schardt D
    Phys Med Biol; 2000 Mar; 45(3):599-607. PubMed ID: 10730959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Monte Carlo calculations of electron beam quality conversion factors for several ion chamber types.
    Muir BR; Rogers DW
    Med Phys; 2014 Nov; 41(11):111701. PubMed ID: 25370615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Proton beam dosimetry in the presence of magnetic fields using Farmer-type ionization chambers of different radii.
    Marot M; Surla S; Burke E; Brons S; Runz A; Greilich S; Karger CP; Jäkel O; Burigo LN
    Med Phys; 2023 Jul; 50(7):4590-4599. PubMed ID: 36940235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Ionization chamber shift correction and surface dose measurements in electron beams.
    Das IJ; McNeeley SW; Cheng CW
    Phys Med Biol; 1998 Nov; 43(11):3419-24. PubMed ID: 9832024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The relative biological effectiveness for carbon, nitrogen, and oxygen ion beams using passive and scanning techniques evaluated with fully 3D silicon microdosimeters.
    Tran LT; Bolst D; Guatelli S; Pogossov A; Petasecca M; Lerch MLF; Chartier L; Prokopovich DA; Reinhard MI; Povoli M; Kok A; Perevertaylo VL; Matsufuji N; Kanai T; Jackson M; Rosenfeld AB
    Med Phys; 2018 May; 45(5):2299-2308. PubMed ID: 29572856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Detector response in the buildup region of small MV fields.
    Wegener S; Herzog B; Sauer OA
    Med Phys; 2020 Mar; 47(3):1327-1339. PubMed ID: 31860128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Monte Carlo correction factors for a Farmer 0.6 cm3 ion chamber dose measurement in the build-up region of the 6 MV clinical beam.
    Pena J; Sánchez-Doblado F; Capote R; Terrón JA; Gómez F
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Mar; 51(6):1523-32. PubMed ID: 16510960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. AAPM's TG-51 protocol for clinical reference dosimetry of high-energy photon and electron beams.
    Almond PR; Biggs PJ; Coursey BM; Hanson WF; Huq MS; Nath R; Rogers DW
    Med Phys; 1999 Sep; 26(9):1847-70. PubMed ID: 10505874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Possibility of using cylindrical ionization chambers for percent depth-dose measurements in clinical electron beams.
    Ono T; Araki F; Yoshiyama F
    Med Phys; 2011 Aug; 38(8):4647-54. PubMed ID: 21928637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The use of 0.5r
    Anusionwu PC; Alpuche Aviles JE; Pistorius S
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2020 Jan; 21(1):117-126. PubMed ID: 31898872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ion chamber and film-based quality assurance of mixed electron-photon radiation therapy.
    Heng VJ; Serban M; Seuntjens J; Renaud MA
    Med Phys; 2021 Sep; 48(9):5382-5395. PubMed ID: 34224144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Calculated absorbed-dose ratios, TG51/TG21, for most widely used cylindrical and parallel-plate ion chambers over a range of photon and electron energies.
    Tailor RC; Hanson WF
    Med Phys; 2002 Jul; 29(7):1464-72. PubMed ID: 12148727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Calculation of the replacement correction factors for ion chambers in megavoltage beams by Monte Carlo simulation.
    Wang LL; Rogers DW
    Med Phys; 2008 May; 35(5):1747-55. PubMed ID: 18561649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effective point of measurement for depth-dose measurements in small MV photon beams with different detectors.
    Wegener S; Sauer OA
    Med Phys; 2019 Nov; 46(11):5209-5215. PubMed ID: 31461533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Technical note: Experimental determination of the effective point of measurement of the PTW-31010 ionization chamber in proton and carbon ion beams.
    Barna S; Resch AF; Puchalska M; Georg D; Palmans H
    Med Phys; 2022 Jan; 49(1):675-681. PubMed ID: 34818685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Absorbed dose to water determination with ionization chamber dosimetry and calorimetry in restricted neutron, photon, proton and heavy-ion radiation fields.
    Brede HJ; Greif KD; Hecker O; Heeg P; Heese J; Jones DT; Kluge H; Schardt D
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Aug; 51(15):3667-82. PubMed ID: 16861773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.