164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34724124)
1. Determining Hospital Volume Threshold for Safety of Minimally Invasive Pancreaticoduodenectomy: A Contemporary Cutpoint Analysis.
Conroy PC; Calthorpe L; Lin JA; Mohamedaly S; Kim A; Hirose K; Nakakura E; Corvera C; Sosa JA; Sarin A; Kirkwood KS; Alseidi A; Adam MA
Ann Surg Oncol; 2022 Mar; 29(3):1566-1574. PubMed ID: 34724124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Minimally Invasive Versus Open Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Cancer: Practice Patterns and Short-term Outcomes Among 7061 Patients.
Adam MA; Choudhury K; Dinan MA; Reed SD; Scheri RP; Blazer DG; Roman SA; Sosa JA
Ann Surg; 2015 Aug; 262(2):372-7. PubMed ID: 26158612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Defining a Hospital Volume Threshold for Minimally Invasive Pancreaticoduodenectomy in the United States.
Adam MA; Thomas S; Youngwirth L; Pappas T; Roman SA; Sosa JA
JAMA Surg; 2017 Apr; 152(4):336-342. PubMed ID: 28030713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparing Short-term and Oncologic Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Versus Open Pancreaticoduodenectomy Across Low and High Volume Centers.
Torphy RJ; Friedman C; Halpern A; Chapman BC; Ahrendt SS; McCarter MM; Edil BH; Schulick RD; Gleisner A
Ann Surg; 2019 Dec; 270(6):1147-1155. PubMed ID: 29771723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Implementation of Minimally Invasive Pancreaticoduodenectomy at Low and High-Volume Centers.
Torphy RJ; Friedman C; Halpern AL; Ahrendt SA; McCarter MD; Del Chiaro M; Schulick RD; Gleisner A
J Surg Res; 2021 Dec; 268():720-728. PubMed ID: 34487965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Minimally Invasive Versus Open Pancreatoduodenectomy: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Comparative Cohort and Registry Studies.
de Rooij T; Lu MZ; Steen MW; Gerhards MF; Dijkgraaf MG; Busch OR; Lips DJ; Festen S; Besselink MG;
Ann Surg; 2016 Aug; 264(2):257-67. PubMed ID: 26863398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Implementation and outcome of minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy in Europe: a registry-based retrospective study - a critical appraisal of the first 3 years of the E-MIPS registry.
Emmen AMLH; de Graaf N; Khatkov IE; Busch OR; Dokmak S; Boggi U; Groot Koerkamp B; Ferrari G; Molenaar IQ; Saint-Marc O; Ramera M; Lips DJ; Mieog JSD; Luyer MDP; Keck T; D'Hondt M; Souche FR; Edwin B; Hackert T; Liem MSL; Iben-Khayat A; van Santvoort HC; Mazzola M; de Wilde RF; Kauffmann EF; Aussilhou B; Festen S; Izrailov R; Tyutyunnik P; Besselink MG; Abu Hilal M;
Int J Surg; 2024 Apr; 110(4):2226-2233. PubMed ID: 38265434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: oncological outcomes.
Nassour I; Choti MA; Porembka MR; Yopp AC; Wang SC; Polanco PM
Surg Endosc; 2018 Jun; 32(6):2907-2913. PubMed ID: 29280014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Minimally invasive surgical approach versus open procedure for pancreaticoduodenectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Wang S; Shi N; You L; Dai M; Zhao Y
Medicine (Baltimore); 2017 Dec; 96(50):e8619. PubMed ID: 29390259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Use and outcome of minimally invasive pancreatic surgery in the European E-MIPS registry.
van der Heijde N; Vissers FL; Manzoni A; Zimmitti G; Balsells J; Berrevoet F; Bjornsson B; van den Boezem P; Boggi U; Bratlie SO; Burdio F; Coratti A; D'Hondt M; Del Pozo CD; Dokmak S; Fara R; Can MF; Festen S; Forgione A; Fristrup C; Gaujoux S; Groot Koerkamp B; Hackert T; Khatkov IE; Keck T; Seppänen H; Lips D; Luyer M; Pittau G; Maglione M; Molenaar IQ; Pessaux P; Roeyen G; Saint-Marc O; Cabus SS; van Santvoort H; van der Schelling G; Serradilla-Martin M; Souche FR; Suarez Muñoz MÁ; Marino MV; Besselink MG; Abu Hilal M;
HPB (Oxford); 2023 Apr; 25(4):400-408. PubMed ID: 37028826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Long-term survival after minimally invasive resection versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary cancers: a systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression.
Kamarajah SK; Gujjuri R; Bundred JR; Hilal MA; White SA
HPB (Oxford); 2021 Feb; 23(2):197-205. PubMed ID: 33077373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Improved outcomes with minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy in patients with dilated pancreatic ducts: a prospective study.
Cos H; LeCompte MT; Srinivasa S; Zarate Rodriguez J; Woolsey CA; Williams G; Patel S; Khan A; Fields RC; Majella Doyle MB; Chapman WC; Strasberg SM; Hawkins WG; Hammill CW; Sanford DE
Surg Endosc; 2022 May; 36(5):3100-3109. PubMed ID: 34235587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Minimally Invasive Pancreaticoduodenectomy in Elderly Patients: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Zhu J; Wang G; Du P; He J; Li Y
World J Surg; 2021 Apr; 45(4):1186-1201. PubMed ID: 33458781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary disease: a comprehensive review of literature and meta-analysis of outcomes compared with open surgery.
Chen K; Pan Y; Liu XL; Jiang GY; Wu D; Maher H; Cai XJ
BMC Gastroenterol; 2017 Nov; 17(1):120. PubMed ID: 29169337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Minimally invasive vs open pancreatoduodenectomy on oncological adequacy: a propensity score-matched analysis.
Ashouri Y; Ho K; Ho H; Hsu CH; Ghaderi I; Riall TS; Konstantinidis IT; Maegawa FB
Surg Endosc; 2022 Oct; 36(10):7302-7311. PubMed ID: 35178590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Wrapping double-mattress anastomosis for pancreaticojejunostomy in minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy can significantly reduce postoperative pancreatic fistula rate compared with conventional pancreaticojejunostomy in open surgery: An analysis of a propensity score-matched sample.
Kiguchi G; Sugioka A; Uchida Y; Yoshikawa J; Nakauchi M; Kojima M; Tanahashi Y; Takahara T; Yasuda A; Suda K; Kato Y; Uyama I
Surg Oncol; 2021 Sep; 38():101577. PubMed ID: 33887674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Minimally Invasive Versus Open Pancreaticoduodenectomy: A Propensity-matched Study From a National Cohort of Patients.
Nassour I; Wang SC; Christie A; Augustine MM; Porembka MR; Yopp AC; Choti MA; Mansour JC; Xie XJ; Polanco PM; Minter RM
Ann Surg; 2018 Jul; 268(1):151-157. PubMed ID: 28486387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Perioperative and oncologic outcome of robot-assisted minimally invasive (hybrid laparoscopic and robotic) pancreatoduodenectomy: based on pancreatic fistula risk score and cancer/staging matched comparison with open pancreatoduodenectomy.
Kim HS; Kim H; Kwon W; Han Y; Byun Y; Kang JS; Choi YJ; Jang JY
Surg Endosc; 2021 Apr; 35(4):1675-1681. PubMed ID: 32277354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Surgical approach to pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: uncomplicated ends justify the means.
Naffouje SA; Pointer DT; Satyadi MA; Hodul P; Anaya DA; Pimiento J; Malafa M; Kim DW; Fleming JB; Denbo JW
Surg Endosc; 2022 Jul; 36(7):4912-4922. PubMed ID: 34859301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Outcomes After Minimally-invasive Versus Open Pancreatoduodenectomy: A Pan-European Propensity Score Matched Study.
Klompmaker S; van Hilst J; Wellner UF; Busch OR; Coratti A; D'Hondt M; Dokmak S; Festen S; Kerem M; Khatkov I; Lips DJ; Lombardo C; Luyer M; Manzoni A; Molenaar IQ; Rosso E; Saint-Marc O; Vansteenkiste F; Wittel UA; Bonsing B; Groot Koerkamp B; Abu Hilal M; Fuks D; Poves I; Keck T; Boggi U; Besselink MG;
Ann Surg; 2020 Feb; 271(2):356-363. PubMed ID: 29864089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
