BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

491 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34724556)

  • 1. Comparison of Clinical Outcomes of Robot-Assisted, Video-Assisted, and Open Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Mederos MA; de Virgilio MJ; Shenoy R; Ye L; Toste PA; Mak SS; Booth MS; Begashaw MM; Wilson M; Gunnar W; Shekelle PG; Maggard-Gibbons M; Girgis MD
    JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Nov; 4(11):e2129228. PubMed ID: 34724556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Does robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy really have the advantage of lymphadenectomy over video-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy in treating esophageal squamous cell carcinoma? A propensity score-matched analysis based on short-term outcomes.
    Deng HY; Luo J; Li SX; Li G; Alai G; Wang Y; Liu LX; Lin YD
    Dis Esophagus; 2019 Jul; 32(7):. PubMed ID: 30496378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of short-term outcomes between robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy and video-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy in treating middle thoracic esophageal cancer.
    Deng HY; Huang WX; Li G; Li SX; Luo J; Alai G; Wang Y; Liu LX; Lin YD
    Dis Esophagus; 2018 Aug; 31(8):. PubMed ID: 29538633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Short-term outcomes of robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a propensity score matched analysis.
    He H; Wu Q; Wang Z; Zhang Y; Chen N; Fu J; Zhang G
    J Cardiothorac Surg; 2018 May; 13(1):52. PubMed ID: 29792203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy: Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic-thoracoscopic technique. Systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Angeramo CA; Bras Harriott C; Casas MA; Schlottmann F
    Surgery; 2021 Dec; 170(6):1692-1701. PubMed ID: 34389164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy versus the conventional minimally invasive one: A meta-analysis and systematic review.
    Jin D; Yao L; Yu J; Liu R; Guo T; Yang K; Gou Y
    Int J Med Robot; 2019 Jun; 15(3):e1988. PubMed ID: 30737881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Exploring the learning curve in minimally invasive esophagectomy: a systematic review.
    Chan KS; Oo AM
    Dis Esophagus; 2023 Sep; 36(9):. PubMed ID: 36857586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy versus video-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Chen H; Liu Y; Peng H; Wang R; Wang K; Li D
    Transl Cancer Res; 2021 Nov; 10(11):4601-4616. PubMed ID: 35116317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) compared to conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) for esophageal cancer: a propensity-matched analysis.
    Tagkalos E; Goense L; Hoppe-Lotichius M; Ruurda JP; Babic B; Hadzijusufovic E; Kneist W; van der Sluis PC; Lang H; van Hillegersberg R; Grimminger PP
    Dis Esophagus; 2020 Apr; 33(4):. PubMed ID: 31206577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Robotic Versus Conventional Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: A Meta-analysis.
    Zhang Y; Dong D; Cao Y; Huang M; Li J; Zhang J; Lin J; Sarkaria IS; Toni L; David R; He J; Li H
    Ann Surg; 2023 Jul; 278(1):39-50. PubMed ID: 36538615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) vs. hybrid minimally invasive esophagectomy: propensity score matched short-term outcome analysis of a European high-volume center.
    Babic B; Müller DT; Jung JO; Schiffmann LM; Grisar P; Schmidt T; Chon SH; Schröder W; Bruns CJ; Fuchs HF
    Surg Endosc; 2022 Oct; 36(10):7747-7755. PubMed ID: 35505259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Robotic-Assisted Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: Postoperative Outcomes in a Nationwide Cohort.
    Turner KM; Delman AM; Johnson K; Patel SH; Wilson GC; Shah SA; Van Haren RM
    J Surg Res; 2023 Mar; 283():152-160. PubMed ID: 36410231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Survival After Esophagectomy: A Propensity-Matched Study of Different Surgical Approaches.
    Weksler B; Sullivan JL
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2017 Oct; 104(4):1138-1146. PubMed ID: 28760463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Long-term survival outcomes associated with robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) for esophageal cancer.
    Byiringiro I; Aurit SJ; Nandipati KC
    Surg Endosc; 2023 May; 37(5):4018-4027. PubMed ID: 36097100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Early outcomes with robot-assisted vs. minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of matched studies.
    Huang Y; Zhao YL; Song JD
    Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 2021 Dec; 25(24):7887-7897. PubMed ID: 34982451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of the short-term outcomes of robot-assisted minimally invasive, video-assisted minimally invasive, and open esophagectomy.
    Gong L; Jiang H; Yue J; Duan X; Tang P; Ren P; Zhao X; Liu X; Zhang X; Yu Z
    J Thorac Dis; 2020 Mar; 12(3):916-924. PubMed ID: 32274159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Robotic versus open Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy: A more accurate lymph node dissection without burdening the leak rate.
    Weindelmayer J; De Pasqual CA; Turolo C; Gervasi MC; Sacco M; Bencivenga M; Giacopuzzi S
    J Surg Oncol; 2023 Jun; 127(7):1109-1115. PubMed ID: 36971002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Short-term outcomes of robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer].
    Tan Z; Zhang X; Wang X; Fu J
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Sep; 19(9):995-998. PubMed ID: 27680066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Robot-assisted and conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy are associated with better postoperative results compared to hybrid and open transthoracic esophagectomy.
    van der Sluis PC; Babic B; Uzun E; Tagkalos E; Berlth F; Hadzijusufovic E; Lang H; Gockel I; van Hillegersberg R; Grimminger PP
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2022 Apr; 48(4):776-782. PubMed ID: 34838394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Outcomes of 350 Robotic-assisted Esophagectomies at a High-volume Cancer Center: A Contemporary Propensity-score Matched Analysis.
    Pointer DT; Saeed S; Naffouje SA; Mehta R; Hoffe SE; Dineen SP; Fleming JB; Fontaine JP; Pimiento JM
    Ann Surg; 2022 Jul; 276(1):111-118. PubMed ID: 33201093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 25.