BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

244 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34725189)

  • 1. Interaural Place-of-Stimulation Mismatch Estimates Using CT Scans and Binaural Perception, But Not Pitch, Are Consistent in Cochlear-Implant Users.
    Bernstein JGW; Jensen KK; Stakhovskaya OA; Noble JH; Hoa M; Kim HJ; Shih R; Kolberg E; Cleary M; Goupell MJ
    J Neurosci; 2021 Dec; 41(49):10161-10178. PubMed ID: 34725189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Interaural Pitch-Discrimination Range Effects for Bilateral and Single-Sided-Deafness Cochlear-Implant Users.
    Goupell MJ; Cosentino S; Stakhovskaya OA; Bernstein JGW
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2019 Apr; 20(2):187-203. PubMed ID: 30623318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of interaural pitch matching and auditory image centering on binaural sensitivity in cochlear implant users.
    Kan A; Litovsky RY; Goupell MJ
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(3):e62-8. PubMed ID: 25565660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Effect of Simulated Interaural Frequency Mismatch on Speech Understanding and Spatial Release From Masking.
    Goupell MJ; Stoelb CA; Kan A; Litovsky RY
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(5):895-905. PubMed ID: 29337763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Binaural Optimization of Cochlear Implants: Discarding Frequency Content Without Sacrificing Head-Shadow Benefit.
    Sheffield SW; Goupell MJ; Spencer NJ; Stakhovskaya OA; Bernstein JGW
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(3):576-590. PubMed ID: 31436754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Computed-Tomography Estimates of Interaural Mismatch in Insertion Depth and Scalar Location in Bilateral Cochlear-Implant Users.
    Goupell MJ; Noble JH; Phatak SA; Kolberg E; Cleary M; Stakhovskaya OA; Jensen KK; Hoa M; Kim HJ; Bernstein JGW
    Otol Neurotol; 2022 Jul; 43(6):666-675. PubMed ID: 35761459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Suitability of the Binaural Interaction Component for Interaural Electrode Pairing of Bilateral Cochlear Implants.
    Hu H; Kollmeier B; Dietz M
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2016; 894():57-64. PubMed ID: 27080646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Relationship Between Interaural Insertion-Depth Differences, Scalar Location, and Interaural Time-Difference Processing in Adult Bilateral Cochlear-Implant Listeners.
    Cleary M; Bernstein JGW; Stakhovskaya OA; Noble J; Kolberg E; Jensen KK; Hoa M; Kim HJ; Goupell MJ
    Trends Hear; 2022; 26():23312165221129165. PubMed ID: 36379607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A Comparison of Place-Pitch-Based Interaural Electrode Matching Methods for Bilateral Cochlear-Implant Users.
    Jensen KK; Cosentino S; Bernstein JGW; Stakhovskaya OA; Goupell MJ
    Trends Hear; 2021; 25():2331216521997324. PubMed ID: 34057382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Improved interaural timing of acoustic nerve stimulation affects sound localization in single-sided deaf cochlear implant users.
    Seebacher J; Franke-Trieger A; Weichbold V; Zorowka P; Stephan K
    Hear Res; 2019 Jan; 371():19-27. PubMed ID: 30439571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Interaural Time-Difference Discrimination as a Measure of Place of Stimulation for Cochlear-Implant Users With Single-Sided Deafness.
    Bernstein JGW; Stakhovskaya OA; Schuchman GI; Jensen KK; Goupell MJ
    Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518765514. PubMed ID: 29623771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Binaural Pitch Fusion in Bilateral Cochlear Implant Users.
    Reiss LAJ; Fowler JR; Hartling CL; Oh Y
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(2):390-397. PubMed ID: 28945657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Place dependent stimulation rates improve pitch perception in cochlear implantees with single-sided deafness.
    Rader T; Döge J; Adel Y; Weissgerber T; Baumann U
    Hear Res; 2016 Sep; 339():94-103. PubMed ID: 27374479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Pitch adaptation patterns in bimodal cochlear implant users: over time and after experience.
    Reiss LA; Ito RA; Eggleston JL; Liao S; Becker JJ; Lakin CE; Warren FM; McMenomey SO
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(2):e23-34. PubMed ID: 25319401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Benefits to Speech Perception in Noise From the Binaural Integration of Electric and Acoustic Signals in Simulated Unilateral Deafness.
    Ma N; Morris S; Kitterick PT
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(3):248-59. PubMed ID: 27116049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Electro-acoustic pitch matching experiments in patients with single-sided deafness and a cochlear implant: Is there a need for adjustment of the default frequency allocation tables?
    Peters JPM; Bennink E; Grolman W; van Zanten GA
    Hear Res; 2016 Dec; 342():124-133. PubMed ID: 27789255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of Interaural Electrode Pairing Methods for Bilateral Cochlear Implants.
    Hu H; Dietz M
    Trends Hear; 2015 Dec; 19():. PubMed ID: 26631108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Abnormal binaural spectral integration in cochlear implant users.
    Reiss LA; Ito RA; Eggleston JL; Wozny DR
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2014 Apr; 15(2):235-48. PubMed ID: 24464088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Preliminary results of the relationship between the binaural interaction component of the electrically evoked auditory brainstem response and interaural pitch comparisons in bilateral cochlear implant recipients.
    He S; Brown CJ; Abbas PJ
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(1):57-68. PubMed ID: 21730858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Neural Processing of Acoustic and Electric Interaural Time Differences in Normal-Hearing Gerbils.
    Vollmer M
    J Neurosci; 2018 Aug; 38(31):6949-6966. PubMed ID: 29959238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.