These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

86 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3472539)

  • 21. Approximal cavitation related to bite-wing image and caries activity in adolescents.
    Lunder N; von der Fehr FR
    Caries Res; 1996; 30(2):143-7. PubMed ID: 8833139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Approximal radiolucencies in partially overlapped enamel: the need for quantitation and a preliminary assessment of a computer-aided image analysis method.
    Pitts NB
    Quintessence Int; 1986 Apr; 17(4):229-36. PubMed ID: 3459200
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Detection and measurement of approximal radiolucencies by computer-aided image analysis.
    Pitts NB
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1984 Sep; 58(3):358-66. PubMed ID: 6592535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A 2-year clinical evaluation of sealed noncavitated approximal posterior carious lesions in adolescents.
    Gomez SS; Basili CP; Emilson CG
    Clin Oral Investig; 2005 Dec; 9(4):239-43. PubMed ID: 16167153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of bitewing, periapical, unfiltered and filtered digital panoramic images for approximal caries detection in posterior teeth.
    Akarslan ZZ; Akdevelioğlu M; Güngör K; Erten H
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 Dec; 37(8):458-63. PubMed ID: 19033431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The difference between clinical and bitewing detection of approximal and occlusal caries in Royal Air Force recruits.
    Richardson PS; McIntyre IG
    Community Dent Health; 1996 Jun; 13(2):65-9. PubMed ID: 8763134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Can radiographic criteria be used to distinguish between cavitated and noncavitated approximal enamel caries?
    Kogen SL; Stephens RG; Reid JA; Donner A
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1987; 16(1):33-6. PubMed ID: 3472973
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparison of diagnostic yields of clinical and radiographic caries examinations in children of different age.
    Machiulskiene V; Nyvad B; Baelum V
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2004 Sep; 5(3):157-62. PubMed ID: 15471524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. In vitro comparison of D- and E-speed film radiography, RVG, and visualix digital radiography for the detection of enamel approximal and dentinal occlusal caries lesions.
    Hintze H; Wenzel A; Jones C
    Caries Res; 1994; 28(5):363-7. PubMed ID: 8001059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparison of diagnostic performance on approximal caries detection among Swedish and Chinese senior dental students using analogue and digital radiographs.
    Minston W; Li G; Wennberg R; Näsström K; Shi XQ
    Swed Dent J; 2013; 37(2):79-85. PubMed ID: 23957142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A comparison of bitewing radiography and interdental transillumination as adjuncts to the clinical identification of approximal caries in posterior teeth.
    Sidi AD; Naylor MN
    Br Dent J; 1988 Jan; 164(1):15-8. PubMed ID: 3422155
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Interproximal caries detection: how good are we?
    Dykstra B
    Dent Today; 2008 Apr; 27(4):144, 146-7. PubMed ID: 18497209
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparison of clinician agreement during visualization of conventional and digitized bitewing radiographs.
    Kimmes NS; Saini TS; Carroll LR
    Gen Dent; 2006; 54(3):182-5. PubMed ID: 16776410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Caries increment and progression in teenagers when using a prevention- rather than restoration-oriented treatment strategy.
    Gröndahl HG; Andersson B; Torstensson T
    Swed Dent J; 1984; 8(5):237-42. PubMed ID: 6596758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Scanning resolution and the detection of approximal caries.
    Janhom A; van Ginkel FC; van Amerongen JP; van der Stelt PF
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2001 May; 30(3):166-71. PubMed ID: 11420630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Detection of approximal caries in digital radiographs before and after correction for attenuation and visual response. An in vitro study.
    Li G; Yoshiura K; Welander U; Shi XQ; McDavid WD
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 Mar; 31(2):113-6. PubMed ID: 12076051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Detection of approximal caries in 5-year-old Swedish children.
    Anderson M; Stecksén-Blicks C; Stenlund H; Ranggård L; Tsilingaridis G; Mejàre I
    Caries Res; 2005; 39(2):92-9. PubMed ID: 15741720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The expected benefits from alternative frequencies of bitewing radiograms.
    Shwartz M; Pliskin JS; Gröndahl HG; Boffa J
    Acta Odontol Scand; 1986 Feb; 44(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 3456688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Radiographic diagnosis of mineral loss in approximal enamel.
    Espelid I; Tveit AB
    Caries Res; 1984; 18(2):141-8. PubMed ID: 6583007
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Reproducibility of computer-aided image-analysis-derived estimates of the depth and area of radiolucencies in approximal enamel.
    Pitts NB; Renson CE
    J Dent Res; 1985 Oct; 64(10):1221-4. PubMed ID: 3861653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.